Difference between revisions of "Jack Balkin, "A Body of Inquiries""
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
GC:  We should have a truth commission and institutional reforms rather than a criminal investigation of high ranking Bush administration officials who might have approved torture policies and illegal treatment of detainees.     | GC:  We should have a truth commission and institutional reforms rather than a criminal investigation of high ranking Bush administration officials who might have approved torture policies and illegal treatment of detainees.     | ||
| − | |||
:IC: We should have a truth commission to document abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.  | :IC: We should have a truth commission to document abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.  | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
:P2: Truth commissions would counteract the tendency toward secret laws.  | :P2: Truth commissions would counteract the tendency toward secret laws.  | ||
:P3: Truth commissions would create a public record of the misconduct.  | :P3: Truth commissions would create a public record of the misconduct.  | ||
| + | |||
:IC:  The South African model for truth and reconciliation is not the right one for us.  | :IC:  The South African model for truth and reconciliation is not the right one for us.  | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:P1:  South Africa's experience of apartheid involved human right violations against the population and needed to reconcile tensions between groups and among individuals.     | :P1:  South Africa's experience of apartheid involved human right violations against the population and needed to reconcile tensions between groups and among individuals.     | ||
:P2:  Our experience with the torture cases does not involve these features.  | :P2:  Our experience with the torture cases does not involve these features.  | ||
| + | |||
:IC: We should not pursue criminal prosecution of abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.  | :IC: We should not pursue criminal prosecution of abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.  | ||
| + | |||
:IIC: The barriers to prosecution are too great.  | :IIC: The barriers to prosecution are too great.  | ||
:P1: Bush officials used the Justice Department's legal advice so they might be able to claim immunity.  | :P1: Bush officials used the Justice Department's legal advice so they might be able to claim immunity.  | ||
:P2: Bush officials might be able to claim immunity from the Military Commissions Act of 2006.  | :P2: Bush officials might be able to claim immunity from the Military Commissions Act of 2006.  | ||
| + | |||
:IC: We should reform the Justice Department and military rules and policies related to torture and immunity.  | :IC: We should reform the Justice Department and military rules and policies related to torture and immunity.  | ||
Latest revision as of 18:14, 2 February 2009
Return to Critical Thinking
Jack Balkin, "A Body of Inquiries"
GC: We should have a truth commission and institutional reforms rather than a criminal investigation of high ranking Bush administration officials who might have approved torture policies and illegal treatment of detainees.
- IC: We should have a truth commission to document abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.
 
- P1: Truth commissions would show our committment to human rights.
 - P2: Truth commissions would counteract the tendency toward secret laws.
 - P3: Truth commissions would create a public record of the misconduct.
 
- IC: The South African model for truth and reconciliation is not the right one for us.
 
- P1: South Africa's experience of apartheid involved human right violations against the population and needed to reconcile tensions between groups and among individuals.
 - P2: Our experience with the torture cases does not involve these features.
 
- IC: We should not pursue criminal prosecution of abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.
 
- IIC: The barriers to prosecution are too great.
 - P1: Bush officials used the Justice Department's legal advice so they might be able to claim immunity.
 - P2: Bush officials might be able to claim immunity from the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
 
- IC: We should reform the Justice Department and military rules and policies related to torture and immunity.