Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| − | + | 1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory. | |
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophy_Proseminar_Instructional_Notes_on_Method | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophy_Proseminar_Instructional_Notes_on_Method | ||
| − | + | 2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments. | |
| − | |||
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Logical_Structure_in_Deductive_and_Inductive_Reasoning | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Logical_Structure_in_Deductive_and_Inductive_Reasoning | ||
| − | + | 3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction | |
| − | |||
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Inductive_Argument_Forms | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Inductive_Argument_Forms | ||
| − | + | 4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions. | |
| − | |||
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion | ||
| − | + | 5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments. | |
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion | ||
| − | + | 6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | |
| − | |||
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors | ||
| Line 33: | Line 29: | ||
Our previous examples -- http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar | Our previous examples -- http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also we should get a study group going for this and or Kries' class this weekend. Anyone who is interested can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com) | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 9 October 2010
Return to Philosophy Proseminar
1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophy_Proseminar_Instructional_Notes_on_Method
2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Logical_Structure_in_Deductive_and_Inductive_Reasoning
3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Inductive_Argument_Forms
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods
Our previous examples -- http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar
Also we should get a study group going for this and or Kries' class this weekend. Anyone who is interested can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com)
