Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
 
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
  
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion
+
[[http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion Notes on Definition]]
  
 
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.
 
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.

Revision as of 01:59, 10 October 2010

Return to Philosophy Proseminar

Here are some links corresponding to each of the topics on the study guide.


1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.

[Terms]

2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.

[Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning]

The difference between explanation and argument

3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction

[Principle of Induction] [Concept of Validity]

4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.

[Notes on Definition]

5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.

http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion

6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.

http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors

http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods

Our previous examples -- http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar

 Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com).
 Hope this helps, 
 -Kennedy