Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments. | 5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments. | ||
| − | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/ | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophy_Proseminar_Instructional_Notes_on_Method#Assessing_Rationales 3 Main Assessment Strategies] |
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | 6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | ||
Revision as of 02:46, 10 October 2010
Return to Philosophy Proseminar
Here are some links corresponding to each of the topics on the study guide.
1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.
[Terms]
2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.
[Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning]
The difference between explanation and argument
3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction
[Principle of Induction] [Concept of Validity]
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors
http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods
Our previous examples -- http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar
Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com). Hope this helps, -Kennedy
