Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory. | 1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory. | ||
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophy_Proseminar_Instructional_Notes_on_Method Terms] | |
2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments. | 2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments. | ||
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Logical_Structure_in_Deductive_and_Inductive_Reasoning Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning] | |
[[The difference between explanation and argument ]] | [[The difference between explanation and argument ]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction | 3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction | ||
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Inductive_Argument_Forms Principle of Induction] | |
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Deductive_Argument_Forms#Validity Concept of Validity] | |
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions. | 4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions. | ||
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2009_Fall_Proseminar_Notes_on_Defintion Notes on Definition] | |
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments. | 5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | 6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | ||
| − | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/ | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods 1. Philosophical Methods |
| − | http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/ | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors 2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors] |
| − | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/2010_Fall_Philosophy_Proseminar Our previous examples in student work] | |
Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com). | Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com). | ||
Hope this helps, | Hope this helps, | ||
-Kennedy | -Kennedy | ||
Revision as of 02:50, 10 October 2010
Return to Philosophy Proseminar
Here are some links corresponding to each of the topics on the study guide.
1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.
2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.
Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning
The difference between explanation and argument
3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction
Principle of Induction Concept of Validity
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.
[http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods 1. Philosophical Methods
2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors
Our previous examples in student work
Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com). Hope this helps, -Kennedy
