Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test"
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | 6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each. | ||
| − | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods 1. Philosophical Methods | + | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods 1. Philosophical Methods] |
[http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors 2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors] | [http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Philosophical_Methods_for_Philosophy_Majors 2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors] | ||
Revision as of 02:50, 10 October 2010
Return to Philosophy Proseminar
Here are some links corresponding to each of the topics on the study guide.
1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.
2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.
Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning
The difference between explanation and argument
3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction
Principle of Induction Concept of Validity
4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.
5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.
6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.
2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors
Our previous examples in student work
Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' class this weekend can email me at (kkrossen@gmail.com). Hope this helps, -Kennedy
