Difference between revisions of "Spring 2013 Ethics Course Lecture Notes A"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m (→January 10) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==January 10== | ==January 10== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Ariely, Why We Lie=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Research on honesty with the "matrix task" | ||
+ | ::*Shredder condition | ||
+ | ::*Payment condition | ||
+ | ::*Probability of getting caught condition | ||
+ | ::*Distance of payment condition | ||
+ | ::*Presence of a cheater condition | ||
+ | :*Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form | ||
+ | :*Implications | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas. | ||
+ | :*Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken. | ||
+ | :*Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists, empiricists, rationalists | ||
+ | ::*Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences. | ||
+ | ::*Kohlberg's "Heinz story," | ||
+ | ::*Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions" | ||
+ | :Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches). | ||
+ | :Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable. | ||
+ | |||
==January 14== | ==January 14== | ||
==January 15== | ==January 15== |
Revision as of 16:31, 9 January 2013
Return to Ethics
These are the notes you will see displayed in class. They can be correlated to study questions for each class day.
Contents
- 1 January 07
- 2 January 08
- 3 January 10
- 4 January 14
- 5 January 15
- 6 January 17
- 7 January 21
- 8 January 22
- 9 January 24
- 10 January 28
- 11 January 29
- 12 January 31
- 13 February 04
- 14 February 05
- 15 February 07
- 16 February 11
- 17 February 12
- 18 February 14
- 19 February 18
- 20 February 19
- 21 February 21
- 22 February 25
- 23 February 26
- 24 February 27
- 25 March 04
- 26 March 05
- 27 March 07
- 28 March 18
- 29 March 19
- 30 March 21
- 31 March 25
- 32 March 26
- 33 March 28
- 34 April 01
- 35 April 02
- 36 April 04
- 37 April 08
- 38 April 09
- 39 April 11
January 07
First Class Topics
- Course, Materials (books, pdfs, and clicker), and Goals
- Course Methods and web sites - view course research questions
- Course website -- for reading schedule, grading scheme, email, pdfs, audio from class, audio comments on assignments
- Course wiki -- for basic course information, lecture notes, study questions.
- Einstruction site - for registering your clicker, viewing clicker questions.
- A typical prep cycle for the course: read, engage, review, prep SQs.
- Time commitment: 6 hours per week as a baseline.
- Grading Schemes: overview.
- Ereserves - pdfs for course reading not in book form.
January 08
Cooper, Chapter 1, Introduction to Philosophical Ethics
- Defining Ethics: Cooper's pragmatic definition, and others
- Levels of value reflection: actions, institutions, principles, theory, meta-theory
- The Zimbardo Prison Experiment: implications
- Example of philosophical method.
- Core ethical principles or intutions that are the basis of ethical theories. p. 23
January 10
Ariely, Why We Lie
- Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
- Shredder condition
- Payment condition
- Probability of getting caught condition
- Distance of payment condition
- Presence of a cheater condition
- Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form
- Implications
Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1
- Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.
- Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
- Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists, empiricists, rationalists
- Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences.
- Kohlberg's "Heinz story,"
- Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"
- Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches).
- Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.