Difference between revisions of "Spring 2016 Ethics Course Study Questions"
m (→JAN 19) |
m (→JAN 21) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==JAN 21== | ==JAN 21== | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. How do Piaget and Kohlberg reflect the mainstream view of rationalists in developmental psychology of the 60's and 70's? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. How do Turiel, Schweder, and Haidt's research challenge the view of rationalist developmental psychology? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Evaluate Haidt's claim that ethics is not about discerning truths so much as furthering social agendas. What strikes you as attractive or problematic about that view? | ||
| + | |||
==JAN 26== | ==JAN 26== | ||
==JAN 28== | ==JAN 28== | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 21 January 2016
Return to Ethics
JAN 12
JAN 14
1. What did Ariely's research show about human moral behavior with respect to cheating?
2. What does this research tell us about cheating, lying, and other moral behaviors?
3. What, if anything, does this research tell us about the nature of ethics?
JAN 19
1. How does ethics involve different levels of justification?
2. What was the Zimbardo experiment and what does it tell us about the nature of ethics?
3. What do the four aspects of the "divided self" (in Haidt's article) tell us about ethics?
JAN 21
1. How do Piaget and Kohlberg reflect the mainstream view of rationalists in developmental psychology of the 60's and 70's?
2. How do Turiel, Schweder, and Haidt's research challenge the view of rationalist developmental psychology?
3. Evaluate Haidt's claim that ethics is not about discerning truths so much as furthering social agendas. What strikes you as attractive or problematic about that view?
