Difference between revisions of "JAN282016ShortAnswer1"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Short Answer #1== | ==Short Answer #1== | ||
| − | :Jonathan Haidt thinks he’s discovered something important about the nature of ethics; something about how it is connected to evolution and less about truth. But Singer might look at this kind of meta-ethics as “crude relativism”. What is Haidt’s meta-ethics and, based on Singer’s arguments is it a form of bad relativism? (400 | + | :Jonathan Haidt thinks he’s discovered something important about the nature of ethics; something about how it is connected to evolution and less about truth. But Singer might look at this kind of meta-ethics as “crude relativism”. What is Haidt’s meta-ethics and, based on Singer’s arguments is it a form of bad relativism? (300-400 words). |
:'''Do not put your name on the document or file name. You may include your student id if you wish. Submit your answer to the dropbox on courses.alfino.org under “Short Answers”. | :'''Do not put your name on the document or file name. You may include your student id if you wish. Submit your answer to the dropbox on courses.alfino.org under “Short Answers”. | ||
''' | ''' | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 28 January 2016
Short Answer #1
- Jonathan Haidt thinks he’s discovered something important about the nature of ethics; something about how it is connected to evolution and less about truth. But Singer might look at this kind of meta-ethics as “crude relativism”. What is Haidt’s meta-ethics and, based on Singer’s arguments is it a form of bad relativism? (300-400 words).
- Do not put your name on the document or file name. You may include your student id if you wish. Submit your answer to the dropbox on courses.alfino.org under “Short Answers”.
