Difference between revisions of "Alfino"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Philosophy of Food]] | :*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Philosophy of Food]] | ||
| − | ==Notes for | + | ==Notes for Seminar Discussions== |
===SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford=== | ===SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford=== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:*Hadot - "ethics of discussion" - | :*Hadot - "ethics of discussion" - | ||
| − | :*Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. Implications for style/method. | + | :*Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. p. 29 Implications for style/method. |
| − | :* | + | ::*Chapter 2: up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives) |
| + | |||
| + | :*Crawford - Chapters 3 and 4 | ||
| + | ::* | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 27 September 2016
Notes for Seminar Discussions
SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford
- Hadot - "ethics of discussion" -
- Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. p. 29 Implications for style/method.
- Chapter 2: up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives)
- Crawford - Chapters 3 and 4
