Difference between revisions of "Alfino"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with " Conference: [http://philevents.org/event/show/25482] ==Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"== :*starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offe...") |
m |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | :*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Self and IF]] | |
+ | :*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Philosophy of Food]] | ||
− | == | + | ==Notes for Seminar Discussions== |
− | + | ===SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford=== | |
− | :* | + | :*Hadot - "ethics of discussion" - |
− | :* | + | :*Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. p. 29 Implications for style/method. |
− | :* | + | ::*Chapter 2: up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :*Crawford - Chapters 3, "Virtual Reality as a Moral Ideal" |
− | ::* | + | ::*child will vs. adult will. situated, freedom of modern self depends on being insulated from contingency by layers of representation. |
− | ::*Kant's | + | ::*Mouseke-doer -- "Oh Tootles!" The Handy Dandy machine. focused on adjustment, 72 q. to become an adult you need to be subject to the "heteronomy of things" |
− | ::* | + | ::*Keep the world from challenging the self is something narcissists do. |
+ | ::*Kant: does this in his moral theory -- 73: quote -- context -- concern about the status of free will | ||
+ | ::*To be rational, for Kant, is to NOT be situated in the world. Choice as expression of the unconditioned will. | ||
+ | ::*77: interesting connection to problem of the modern self -- kant's model of the self leads to a self that is fragile, can't tolerate contingency, seeks to be comfortable in a "me-world" of manufactured experience. (this might be the kind of self that demands insulation for it's views and identity. freedom from conflict. | ||
+ | ::*thesis (he's heading toward): There is freedom and individuality in the world beyond your head, but only if you acquire the skills. | ||
− | :* | + | :*Crawford - Chapter 4, "Attention and Design" |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ::*Mercedes "brake assist" - fetish of automaticity -- product of capitalism. fake engine noise 85 | |
− | ::* | + | ::*"The World is its Own Best Model" - embodied representations vs. symbolic representations. importance of "cross modal binding" 83. |
− | + | ::*problem at the end - does a world of symbolic representations undermine real choice? Is capitalism designing things to foster disengagement (autism)? (counter argument - aren't we developing skills with virtual reality? symbolic reality? | |
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :*Dennett, Chapter 3 |
− | |||
− | :* | + | :*Section 9. Three species of Goulding: Rathering, Piling On, and the Gould two-step. |
− | + | ||
− | + | :*"rathering" - really false dichotomy with a rhetorical flourish, "rather" - nice mix of informal fallacy and rhetoric. | |
− | + | :*"piling on" - example p. 50. exaggerating the alternative that he wants to dismiss (false dichotomy mixed with straw man" | |
− | + | :*"two step" - creating a straw man version of an opponents argument and then treating the author's actual position as a grudging acceptance that the author really sees the problem with the straw man version. | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :* |
Latest revision as of 23:45, 27 September 2016
Notes for Seminar Discussions
SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford
- Hadot - "ethics of discussion" -
- Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. p. 29 Implications for style/method.
- Chapter 2: up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives)
- Crawford - Chapters 3, "Virtual Reality as a Moral Ideal"
- child will vs. adult will. situated, freedom of modern self depends on being insulated from contingency by layers of representation.
- Mouseke-doer -- "Oh Tootles!" The Handy Dandy machine. focused on adjustment, 72 q. to become an adult you need to be subject to the "heteronomy of things"
- Keep the world from challenging the self is something narcissists do.
- Kant: does this in his moral theory -- 73: quote -- context -- concern about the status of free will
- To be rational, for Kant, is to NOT be situated in the world. Choice as expression of the unconditioned will.
- 77: interesting connection to problem of the modern self -- kant's model of the self leads to a self that is fragile, can't tolerate contingency, seeks to be comfortable in a "me-world" of manufactured experience. (this might be the kind of self that demands insulation for it's views and identity. freedom from conflict.
- thesis (he's heading toward): There is freedom and individuality in the world beyond your head, but only if you acquire the skills.
- Crawford - Chapter 4, "Attention and Design"
- Mercedes "brake assist" - fetish of automaticity -- product of capitalism. fake engine noise 85
- "The World is its Own Best Model" - embodied representations vs. symbolic representations. importance of "cross modal binding" 83.
- problem at the end - does a world of symbolic representations undermine real choice? Is capitalism designing things to foster disengagement (autism)? (counter argument - aren't we developing skills with virtual reality? symbolic reality?
- Dennett, Chapter 3
- Section 9. Three species of Goulding: Rathering, Piling On, and the Gould two-step.
- "rathering" - really false dichotomy with a rhetorical flourish, "rather" - nice mix of informal fallacy and rhetoric.
- "piling on" - example p. 50. exaggerating the alternative that he wants to dismiss (false dichotomy mixed with straw man"
- "two step" - creating a straw man version of an opponents argument and then treating the author's actual position as a grudging acceptance that the author really sees the problem with the straw man version.