Difference between revisions of "Alfino Projects"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "===Alfino's Projects=== I'm working on three main projects right now. :*1 Philosophy of Food ::*As I mentioned in class, I'm just starting to explore opportunities in ...") |
m |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:*1 Philosophy of Food | :*1 Philosophy of Food | ||
− | ::*As I mentioned in class, I'm just starting to explore opportunities in this area, having spent some time getting a course together. My first conference paper | + | ::*As I mentioned in class, I'm just starting to explore opportunities in this area, having spent some time getting a course together. My first conference paper was from this summer, a paper called, "Sourcing Values in a Food Philosophy" [https://www.dropbox.com/s/wdnj1c08u3kddjk/Sourcing%20Values%20in%20a%20Food%20Philosophy.docx?dl=0]. Before the conference I was approached by an editor about book ideas (This is pretty typical. Editors usually have assistants who comb the programs for prospects.) and I suggested investigating the possibility of an edited collection of essays on "philosophical diets" to see if traditional approaches still make sense in light of developments in the agricultural sciences, ecology, feminism, and food studies. The conference paper hints at this argument. The first part of this project is to do a literature search (it almost always is) and engage in some communication with scholars who I think might share this perspective. If it doesn't resonate with them, I can either propose the project as an authored book or pass. My goal is to report back to the publisher, hopefully around November with an assessment of the attractiveness of the project. Of course, there's also the option of turning the conference paper into an article. |
:*2 JIE special issue (2019) on "Naturalism and Moral Responsibility" | :*2 JIE special issue (2019) on "Naturalism and Moral Responsibility" | ||
− | ::* | + | |
− | ::* | + | ::*Naturalism poses challenges to traditional understandings of moral responsiblity. The more we can understand behavior in terms of organic states of the body, the harder it is to blame or praise people for how they are. In the extreme case, philosophers like Bruce Waller, argue against the concept of moral responsibility itself. Other, like Manuel Vargas, offer revisions to the traditional concept. The issue is tied up with the free will debate, so you will want to review your understanding of basic positions there. I'm developing bibliography on this for a couple of reasons. I want to put out an articulate call for papers and I want to personally contact some scholars who I think would be important to represent in the special issue. Everyone will get peer reviewed, but some articles might be also be invited. |
+ | |||
+ | ::*This radiolab episode presents the problem in real life. [http://www.radiolab.org/story/revising-fault-line/] | ||
+ | ::*Naturalism.org invited Daniel Dennett to review Waller's book. And they had an exchange. | ||
+ | :::*Dennett review of Waller [http://www.naturalism.org/resources/book-reviews/dennett-review-of-against-moral-responsibility] | ||
+ | :::*Exchange on Waller [http://www.naturalism.org/resources/book-reviews/exchange-on-wallers-against-moral-responsibility] | ||
:*3. Work on Freedom of Speech and related issues. | :*3. Work on Freedom of Speech and related issues. | ||
::This is a longstanding interest in information ethics and freedom of speech, but recent work was motivated by contemporary controversies over free speech and an influential book I read, Timothy Garton Ash's, Free Speech. I wrote a review of that book, "Can the Enlightenment Bring Free Speech to Cosmopolis?" [https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9rfbwd41e88729/Can%20the%20Enlightenment%20bring%20Free%20Speech%20to%20Cosmopolis.docx?dl=0] and a conference paper, "The Universality of Free Speech" | ::This is a longstanding interest in information ethics and freedom of speech, but recent work was motivated by contemporary controversies over free speech and an influential book I read, Timothy Garton Ash's, Free Speech. I wrote a review of that book, "Can the Enlightenment Bring Free Speech to Cosmopolis?" [https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9rfbwd41e88729/Can%20the%20Enlightenment%20bring%20Free%20Speech%20to%20Cosmopolis.docx?dl=0] and a conference paper, "The Universality of Free Speech" |
Revision as of 19:50, 1 September 2017
Alfino's Projects
I'm working on three main projects right now.
- 1 Philosophy of Food
- As I mentioned in class, I'm just starting to explore opportunities in this area, having spent some time getting a course together. My first conference paper was from this summer, a paper called, "Sourcing Values in a Food Philosophy" [1]. Before the conference I was approached by an editor about book ideas (This is pretty typical. Editors usually have assistants who comb the programs for prospects.) and I suggested investigating the possibility of an edited collection of essays on "philosophical diets" to see if traditional approaches still make sense in light of developments in the agricultural sciences, ecology, feminism, and food studies. The conference paper hints at this argument. The first part of this project is to do a literature search (it almost always is) and engage in some communication with scholars who I think might share this perspective. If it doesn't resonate with them, I can either propose the project as an authored book or pass. My goal is to report back to the publisher, hopefully around November with an assessment of the attractiveness of the project. Of course, there's also the option of turning the conference paper into an article.
- 2 JIE special issue (2019) on "Naturalism and Moral Responsibility"
- Naturalism poses challenges to traditional understandings of moral responsiblity. The more we can understand behavior in terms of organic states of the body, the harder it is to blame or praise people for how they are. In the extreme case, philosophers like Bruce Waller, argue against the concept of moral responsibility itself. Other, like Manuel Vargas, offer revisions to the traditional concept. The issue is tied up with the free will debate, so you will want to review your understanding of basic positions there. I'm developing bibliography on this for a couple of reasons. I want to put out an articulate call for papers and I want to personally contact some scholars who I think would be important to represent in the special issue. Everyone will get peer reviewed, but some articles might be also be invited.
- 3. Work on Freedom of Speech and related issues.
- This is a longstanding interest in information ethics and freedom of speech, but recent work was motivated by contemporary controversies over free speech and an influential book I read, Timothy Garton Ash's, Free Speech. I wrote a review of that book, "Can the Enlightenment Bring Free Speech to Cosmopolis?" [5] and a conference paper, "The Universality of Free Speech"