Difference between revisions of "JAN 18"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==3: JAN 18== ===Assigned=== :*Hibbing, John R., Kevin Smith, and John R. Alford, ''Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political difference'', Chapter...")
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==3: JAN 18==
+
==2: JAN 18. Unit One. Evolution of Morality==
  
 
===Assigned===
 
===Assigned===
  
:*Hibbing, John R., Kevin Smith, and John R. Alford, ''Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political difference'', Chapter 1, "Living with the Enemy". (32)
+
:*Sapolsky C10 – “The Evolution of Behavior,” (329-353; 24) – Key concepts: – evolution basics, ind/kin selection, reciprocal altruism, cooperation.
:*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvtOWEXDIQ PBS Aristotle and Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38]
+
:*Churchland C1 – “The Snuggle for Survival,” – (19-43; 24) Key concepts: neurology of mammalian bonding
  
===In-class content===
+
===In-Class===
  
:*Lecture Segment: Philosophical Theories: Virtue Ethics
+
:*Everyday Ethics: Mapping Conscience
:*Lecture Segment: Some Preliminaries about Ethical theory and objectivity
+
:*Writing: Practice Writing and Dropbox Training starts today.
  
===Some Preliminaries about Objectivity in Ethics and Features of Ethical Discourse===
+
===Sapolsky, Chapter 10: The Evolution of Human Behavior Part 1 328-354===
  
:*A Framework for thinking about moral theories.
+
:*Evolution 101 — 3 steps - Inheritance - Variation - Fitness
  
::*Where should we look for "moral goodness"?
+
:*Some misconceptions:
:::*Intentions (Kantian),  
+
::*1. Evolution is not so much about survival as reproduction.  Antagonistic pleiotropy — sperm early, cancer later.
:::*Person (a virtuous person) (Aristotle),
+
::*2. The living are not better adapted than the extinct.  Fitness isn't "prospective"
:::*Consequences (Mill, Singer - Utilitarian)
+
::*3. Evolution is "just a “theory”
  
:*The following is pretty standard, but was drawn from Peter Singer's classic, ''Practical Ethics'':
+
::*Sexual selection and natural selection.  Example of peacocks — trade offs between two forms of selection. 
  
:*Question to keep in mind for the next 5 minutes: When Haidt was showing that there was cultural variation in the way people make the "Harm / Convention" distinction, was he embracing "bad relativism"?
+
::*Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology.  Premise: Evolution selects for social and psychological traits and behaviors that improve fitness -- just like it selects for bodies that stand up to selection pressures. 
  
:*Singer's arguments against cultural relativism:
+
::*Marlin Perkins and Mutal of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom.  Bad ideas about evolution of altruistic species behavior.  Group selection doesn’t work that way. 
  
::*Cultural Relativism (the old discussion): Ethics varies by culture.  Singer: This is true and false, same act under different conditions may have different value, but this is '''superficial relativism'''.  For example, existence of birth control led to a general change in sexual ethics. The moral principle in question (don't have kids you're not ready to care for) might remain the same and be objective, but the prohibition on casual sex might change. 
+
:*'''Individual Selection''' — 334: competitive infanticide: why langur monkeys kill babiesHow females develop a false estrus to fight back.   (Working against mountain gorillas these days.)
  
::*Note: There is strong polling data on advisability of living together prior to marriageNow, yes; 60 years ago, noSo cultural change itself doesn't tell you whether moral principles are changing.   
+
:*'''Kin Selection''' — 336: Basic idea: your nearest kin has most of your genesHaldane, “I’d gladly lay down my life for two brothers or eight cousins.”  Allomothering.  Grooming behaviors reflect closeness.  337: vervet monkey study - A treats B badly, then B treat A and A's kin badly. Playback studiesThese studies show in various ways how warning behaviors track kinship relationships in social primates.   
  
::*Subjectivist Relativism - This position may not be held by any thoughtful person, but it sounds like what some people say when they start studying values and becomes confused or cynical.   
+
::*problem for kin selection — avoiding inbreeding.  Many species mate with 1-3rd cousinsSperm aggregationMalagasy giant jumping rat. 340 - women prefer smell of near relatives over unrelated.
:::*The Position: "Wrong" means "I disapprove" or "my society disapproves")
 
:::*The Problems:
 
::::*If this sort of relativism is true, polls could determine ethicsBut they don't.
 
::::*Deep subjectivism can't making sense of disagreement. Ethics is a kind of conversation.
 
::::*There is just too much research suggesting that "I approve" isn't philosophical "rock bottom".
 
  
:*Singer: Ok to say the values aren't objective like physics (aren't facts about the world), but not sensible to deny the meaningfulness of moral disagreement and ethical reasoning.
+
:*How do animal recognize kin?  Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) gives many animals olfactory recognition of kin. Other mechanisms: songs, vaginal fluid smell, milk.
  
:*An evolutionist's twist: A society's ethical culture can produce positive, neutral, or negative outcomes for human flourishingIn this sense, values have objective consequences in meeting selection pressures (both natural and cultural). (Vax values, for example.)
+
:*How do we do kin selection?  Pseudo-kin selection or “green beard” effectsWe are not limited to actual kin, any conspicuous feature (like a green beard).  Humans show green beard effects.  Related to parochialism and xenophobia. It could also be that our preference for humans over non-humans is a big green bread effect.
  
:*Are there minimum conditions for ethical theories? (Or, What kind of conversation is ethics?)
+
:*'''Reciprocal Altruism.'''
  
::*The sorts of reasons that count as ethical: '''universalizable''' ones. Can't just appeal to one person or group's interestNote: most standard ethical theories satisfy this requirement, yet yield different analysis and advice. We will look at the specific form of universalization in each theory we discuss, but you could say this is a kind of defining feature of ethical discourse.
+
::*Don't just think about evolution as promoting competition toward extinctionEquilibriums are important. Sustaining conditions that meet selection pressures. (problems that can be addressed by values) Maintaining a good community.
  
===Hibbing, et. al. ''Predisposed'' Chapter 1===
+
::*Reciprocal altruism is a third way that evolution shapes human behavior.  Unrelated individuals cooperate across nature (fish in schools, birds in formation, herds).  "Geometry of the selfish herd."  Also unrelated primates.  Important 1971 paper by Trivers (344) on reciprocal altruism. How social species incur a fitness cost to benefit another individual with expectation of reciprocation.
  
:*'''Some opening examples of the persistence of partisanship'''
+
:*Requirements for reciprocal altruismSocial species, frequent interactions, recognition of individuals (so, also memory).
:*opening example: William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal -- meant as example of highly educated partisans who would be able to debate in a civilized way60's era political divisions often violent. 
 
:*also historical examples of highly partisan politics -- Hamilton & Adams, Hamilton & Burr (duelled). Jefferson's dirty tricks. 
 
  
:*Goal of the Book:  to explain why people experience and interpret the political world so very differently. Thesis at p. 5: “Our pitch…” (6): list of difference that track political differenceREAD
+
::*cheating and freeriding can create a "Red Queen" situation.   
  
:*'''A methodological concern'''
+
:*Two big questions: when is cooperation optimal, how can altruism start?
:*Does it makes sense to reduce political difference to "liberal" vs. "conservative".  They are in fact measuring lots of differences, but claim there is a tradition of recognizing this difference.  11: some terminological issues.  Ultimately, labels for clusters of real personality and behavioral differences. 
 
  
:*Think Probabalistically: not biological determinists, rather real persistent differences shape and mold our ideology.  Example: relation between conscientiousness and ideology 14.  A number of studies replicate a positive correlation bt conscientiousness and conservatism.  Lesson on 15: difference between representing data in categories vs. scatterplot.  Wilson-Patterson index of conservatism.  Brief lesson on correlation, 17.  Correlation for conscientiousness and conservatism small r = .2
+
:*What strategy for cooperating is optimal?
  
:*'''What are predispositions?'''
+
::*background to Game Theory - John von Neumann.  Prisoner's Dilemma connected biologists to game theoristsShort video on PD: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJCGTNIwmv8] (Note: A good video, but he doesn’t quite get the implication rightIt’s not really just a dilemma between individual and group, because the optimal cooperative benefit is also the optimal individual benefitSo it’s more a dilemma between counting on the group payoff being the best for you vs. getting the best individual payoffIt’s all about you, not doing something for the group.)
:*Predispositions - "biologically and psychologically instantied defaults that, absent new information or overriding, govern response to given stimuli" (24).   
+
::*Basics of a Prisoner's Dilemma payoffA&B cooperate (hold out): 1 year: A cooperates, B defects (rats out B by confessing): B walks and A gets three years. Cooperation is best, but only if you can count on it. If not, then you have to think of average payoffs or outcomes. Some some sets of payoffs, thinking this way leads to defection, the most rational choice, but not optimal.  Quite a little dilemma.
::*Leibniz speculated about "appetitions"
 
::*Neuroscientist Eagleman: brain running alot of its own programsAd hoc defenses (also in Haidt) called "baloney generator" by PinkerWe may have an illusion of rationality and controlexamples of self-deception like this, p. 21, also top of 22 read. 
 
::*Responses to Political stimuli emotionally salient and not always consciousLodge: "hot cognition" or "automaticity" 
 
::*Predispositions vary qualitatively and by intensity. (Examples among people you know.)
 
::*Note examples from environmental psych on top of p. 21 and top of 22.
 
  
:*23: clarifying argument: not nature / nurture. predispositions are difficult to change. research on long term stability of pol. orientation.  180 degree turn is very unusual. 
+
::*defection is optimal for single round PD, but what about 3 rounds. Still best to defect. What about "iterated" (uncertain number of rounds)?
  
'''Technical definition of predispositions''': "Predispositions, then, can be thought of as biologically and psychologically instantiated defaults that, absent new information or conscious overriding, govern response to given stimuli."
+
::*Axelrod's challenge:  Optimal strategy for iterated PD.  Winner: Anatol Rapoport:  Cooperation on 1st round and then match opponent's previous behavior.  "Tit for Tat" Always works toward a draw, or slight negative outcome.  Not that Tit for Tat tilts toward cooperation, but avoids being a sucker and punishes defectors.  famous paper in 1981 by Axelrod and Hamilton.  
  
:*Our actual predispositions vary, but also the degree to which we have predispositions is variable across a group. (This is one reason researchers in the field sometimes focus on highly partisan test subjects.)
+
::*"Signal errors" can reduce Tit for Tat payoffs.  Remedies: "Contrite tit for tat (retaliate after two defections) and Forgiving (forgive 1/3 of defections).  Both address the signal error problem, but have other vulnerabilities.
  
:*25: some background on theorizing about political dispositionswhat is new today is better research, but also research connecting political variation with bio/cog variation.
+
::*Mixed (genetic) strategies: You could start out with one strategy and then change to anotherHow do you go from punitive Tit for Tat to one incorporating forgiveness?  Trust.  350-351: describes a changing environment a events signal to individuals to change strategies.  Kind of a model of real life.
  
:*27: resistance to this kind of theory in political science.  Philip Converse.  also, idea that politics is best understood in terms of history and culture
+
:::*Black Hamlet fish
  
===Philosophical Moral Theories: Virtue Ethics===
+
:::*Stickleback fish
  
:*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvtOWEXDIQ PBS Aristotle and Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38]
+
::*But skeptical that tit for tat has been found outside humans.
  
:*concepts from video...
+
===Churchland C1 – “The Snuggle for Survival,”===
  
::*Virtue — general idea of being an excellent person. Also, specific lists of virtues (vary by time and culture)
+
:*Agatha Christie quote. Moms are tough.
  
:*A bit of Aristotle’s theory of virtue and human nature:  fixed nature, species eternal, '''proper function (telos),''' distinctive aspect of function: being rational and political(Note that modern virtue theorists aren't committed to some of A's false ideas.)
+
:*Turtles never help salamanders, but dogs sometimes help kittensAren't you glad you're not a lizard?
  
::*Virtue is natural to us. Like an acorn becoming a tree. Being virtuous is being the best of the kind of thing you are.  A deep intuition supports this developmental approach. (Pause to consider personal examples of the reality of moral development.)
+
:*Altricial infancy - born dependent, long maturation period. Big Learners.
  
::*Theory of the Golden Mean: Virtue as mean between extremes of emotion:  Ex. Courage (story of stopping the mugger), Honesty, Generosity. (Let's give our own examples.) Virtue as training of emotional response in relation to knowledge of circumstances and the good.
+
:*Endothermy is "expensive"Altricial infancy and learning is "expensive".
  
::*How do you acquire virtue? Experience.  Practical Wisdom cultivated through habituationFollow a moral exemplar (virtue coach). Good parenting and shaping by healthy family.  It's a training program in becoming the best human you can be based on your "telos".  
+
:*Meet your cortexVery involved in social behaviors, but also other structures, like nucleus accumbens.
  
::*What if we don’t want to become virtuous?  What is the motivation to virtue?  The pursuit of a happy life that “goes well”.  Eudaimonia.  Human flourishingChallenge and development of talents. Should be attractive. Connection between virtue and happiness not guaranteed for Aristotle, but could be tighter in other versions.
+
:*Mice - 14 million cortical neurons; Monkey - 2 billion; Human - 16 billionYeah!!!
  
:*Additional points:
+
:*"Expensive" - brain is 2% of body mass but 25% of calorie intake.  Fire, cooking.  Wrangham, Catching Fire!
  
::*centrality of virtues and practical wisdom.  Is practical wisdom real? 
+
:*read at 41: What your cortex does for you that enables moralityInterpreting expections!
::*historic variability and list of virtues. Curiosity was a vice in Medieval EuropeCheck out virtue lists on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue Virtue Wiki].
 
  
:*From Aristotle to Evolutionary theoryEternality of the speciesWhat if you drop this false belief? Human excellence may have to do with meeting or exceeding the challenges posed by our environmentThen the idea that virtues change by time and culture makes more senseThe pursuit of the good life is the objective and constant part of morality, and the everything that changes is part of the challenge of knowing the human good.
+
===Everyday Ethics: Sorting Expectations by Values===
 +
 
 +
:*In today's roll call question, fill in the sentence, "I expect . . ." with an expectation your have of yourself or others.  For example, "I expect zags to be kind, I expect drivers to avoid distractions, I expect others to obey the law"(Notice how easy it is for you to generate these.) As you listen to each student's statement, try to decide whether it is an expectation related to morality or not ("I expect the light to turn green" is not).  Also, try to identify the value or values associated with the expection.
 +
 
 +
===Everyday Ethics: Mapping Conscience===
 +
 
 +
:*One of the remarkable things about morality in humans is how we already know many "objective" things about norms even if we can't say exactly where we learned them.  Consider the following list:
 +
 
 +
::*1. You are not obligated to forgive the murderer of your father.
 +
::*2. Harming a child is one of the worst things you can do.   
 +
::*3. You should not accept a gift, favor, or benefit from someone if you are not prepared to reciprocate in some way.
 +
::*4. It’s ok to tell a friend that their partner is cheating on them.
 +
::*5. If you feel someone is disrespectful to you, it is ok to share your experience with others.
 +
::*6. If a stranger asks you a very personal question, it’s ok to avoid answering, or even not tell them the truth.
 +
::*7. It’s okay to defend yourself.
 +
::*8. If your country is attacked, it’s okay to strike back.
 +
::*9. You shouldn’t complain if your friend chooses to help their family members over you.  
 +
::*10. You should help your family over friends and strangers.
 +
::*11. Strangers in your community have a greater expectation of help from you than distant strangers. 
 +
::*12. No one is obligated to be your friend.
 +
::*13. If your friend asks you for help, you shouldn’t ignore them.
 +
::*14. Some of the things you learn about an intimate partner should not be disclosed to others.
 +
::*15. If someone is your friend, they are obligated to some degree of loyalty, cooperation, and sympathetic interpretation of your motives and actions.
 +
::*16. If you are cooperating with someone as a partner, you should avoid disparaging them to others.
 +
::*17. If you choose to cooperate with someone, you need to make yourself answerable to them about things related to your cooperative tasks.
 +
 
 +
:*In your group discussion of this list, pick items and ask each other if they are true statements.  Then, assuming it is, consider whether you learned this truth explicitly or implicitly.  For example, is it something you were taught, learned by example, or implied by more general understandings you have of humans and human reality?
 +
 
 +
===1st Writing and Dropbox practice (not due on today’s class)===
 +
 
 +
:*Please write a 250 word maximum answer to the following question by '''Wednesday, January 24th, 11:59pm.''' This assignment will give us some initial writing to look at and give you practice with the dropbox protocol for turning in pseudonymous writing in the course. For this assignment, the writing itself is ungraded, but you will receive 15 points for following the instructions accurately.
 +
 
 +
::*'''Topic:''' Is it morally acceptable to gossip?  If so, under what conditions and why? Does gossip serve a legitimate purpose?  If so, what is it?  [Note: Definitions of gossip are somewhat variable.  For this assignment, gossip is "Sharing information about others that may be of a personal, embarrassing, or unflattering nature.  Typically, when we gossip, we do not want the person(s) gossiped about to know that we have gossiped about them. 
 +
 +
::*'''Prompt Advice''':  Try to make your position clear (the "what") and the reasons clear (the "why")Good arguments also try to respond to objections and consider the most reasonable opposing views.  Your position is likely to be stronger if it is qualified in various ways.  I strongly encourage you to draft your answer the night before it is due and return to it on the night that it is due.
 +
 
 +
:*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate.  I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''.  Collaboration  is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class.  The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer.  Keep it verbal.  Generate your own examples. 
 +
 
 +
::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]].
 +
::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs, but do indent the first line of each paragraph. 
 +
::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''.  You may put your student ID number in the file.  Always put a word count in the file. Save your file for this assignment with the name: Gossip.
 +
::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#0 1st Writing and Dropbox practice" dropbox.
 +
::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points.

Latest revision as of 18:52, 18 January 2024

2: JAN 18. Unit One. Evolution of Morality

Assigned

  • Sapolsky C10 – “The Evolution of Behavior,” (329-353; 24) – Key concepts: – evolution basics, ind/kin selection, reciprocal altruism, cooperation.
  • Churchland C1 – “The Snuggle for Survival,” – (19-43; 24) Key concepts: neurology of mammalian bonding

In-Class

  • Everyday Ethics: Mapping Conscience
  • Writing: Practice Writing and Dropbox Training starts today.

Sapolsky, Chapter 10: The Evolution of Human Behavior Part 1 328-354

  • Evolution 101 — 3 steps - Inheritance - Variation - Fitness
  • Some misconceptions:
  • 1. Evolution is not so much about survival as reproduction. Antagonistic pleiotropy — sperm early, cancer later.
  • 2. The living are not better adapted than the extinct. Fitness isn't "prospective"
  • 3. Evolution is "just a “theory”
  • Sexual selection and natural selection. Example of peacocks — trade offs between two forms of selection.
  • Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology. Premise: Evolution selects for social and psychological traits and behaviors that improve fitness -- just like it selects for bodies that stand up to selection pressures.
  • Marlin Perkins and Mutal of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom. Bad ideas about evolution of altruistic species behavior. Group selection doesn’t work that way.
  • Individual Selection — 334: competitive infanticide: why langur monkeys kill babies. How females develop a false estrus to fight back. (Working against mountain gorillas these days.)
  • Kin Selection — 336: Basic idea: your nearest kin has most of your genes. Haldane, “I’d gladly lay down my life for two brothers or eight cousins.” Allomothering. Grooming behaviors reflect closeness. 337: vervet monkey study - A treats B badly, then B treat A and A's kin badly. Playback studies. These studies show in various ways how warning behaviors track kinship relationships in social primates.
  • problem for kin selection — avoiding inbreeding. Many species mate with 1-3rd cousins. Sperm aggregation. Malagasy giant jumping rat. 340 - women prefer smell of near relatives over unrelated.
  • How do animal recognize kin? Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) gives many animals olfactory recognition of kin. Other mechanisms: songs, vaginal fluid smell, milk.
  • How do we do kin selection? Pseudo-kin selection or “green beard” effects. We are not limited to actual kin, any conspicuous feature (like a green beard). Humans show green beard effects. Related to parochialism and xenophobia. It could also be that our preference for humans over non-humans is a big green bread effect.
  • Reciprocal Altruism.
  • Don't just think about evolution as promoting competition toward extinction. Equilibriums are important. Sustaining conditions that meet selection pressures. (problems that can be addressed by values) Maintaining a good community.
  • Reciprocal altruism is a third way that evolution shapes human behavior. Unrelated individuals cooperate across nature (fish in schools, birds in formation, herds). "Geometry of the selfish herd." Also unrelated primates. Important 1971 paper by Trivers (344) on reciprocal altruism. How social species incur a fitness cost to benefit another individual with expectation of reciprocation.
  • Requirements for reciprocal altruism. Social species, frequent interactions, recognition of individuals (so, also memory).
  • cheating and freeriding can create a "Red Queen" situation.
  • Two big questions: when is cooperation optimal, how can altruism start?
  • What strategy for cooperating is optimal?
  • background to Game Theory - John von Neumann. Prisoner's Dilemma connected biologists to game theorists. Short video on PD: [1] (Note: A good video, but he doesn’t quite get the implication right. It’s not really just a dilemma between individual and group, because the optimal cooperative benefit is also the optimal individual benefit. So it’s more a dilemma between counting on the group payoff being the best for you vs. getting the best individual payoff. It’s all about you, not doing something for the group.)
  • Basics of a Prisoner's Dilemma payoff: A&B cooperate (hold out): 1 year: A cooperates, B defects (rats out B by confessing): B walks and A gets three years. Cooperation is best, but only if you can count on it. If not, then you have to think of average payoffs or outcomes. Some some sets of payoffs, thinking this way leads to defection, the most rational choice, but not optimal. Quite a little dilemma.
  • defection is optimal for single round PD, but what about 3 rounds. Still best to defect. What about "iterated" (uncertain number of rounds)?
  • Axelrod's challenge: Optimal strategy for iterated PD. Winner: Anatol Rapoport: Cooperation on 1st round and then match opponent's previous behavior. "Tit for Tat" Always works toward a draw, or slight negative outcome. Not that Tit for Tat tilts toward cooperation, but avoids being a sucker and punishes defectors. famous paper in 1981 by Axelrod and Hamilton.
  • "Signal errors" can reduce Tit for Tat payoffs. Remedies: "Contrite tit for tat (retaliate after two defections) and Forgiving (forgive 1/3 of defections). Both address the signal error problem, but have other vulnerabilities.
  • Mixed (genetic) strategies: You could start out with one strategy and then change to another. How do you go from punitive Tit for Tat to one incorporating forgiveness? Trust. 350-351: describes a changing environment a events signal to individuals to change strategies. Kind of a model of real life.
  • Black Hamlet fish
  • Stickleback fish
  • But skeptical that tit for tat has been found outside humans.

Churchland C1 – “The Snuggle for Survival,”

  • Agatha Christie quote. Moms are tough.
  • Turtles never help salamanders, but dogs sometimes help kittens. Aren't you glad you're not a lizard?
  • Altricial infancy - born dependent, long maturation period. Big Learners.
  • Endothermy is "expensive". Altricial infancy and learning is "expensive".
  • Meet your cortex. Very involved in social behaviors, but also other structures, like nucleus accumbens.
  • Mice - 14 million cortical neurons; Monkey - 2 billion; Human - 16 billion. Yeah!!!
  • "Expensive" - brain is 2% of body mass but 25% of calorie intake. Fire, cooking. Wrangham, Catching Fire!
  • read at 41: What your cortex does for you that enables morality. Interpreting expections!

Everyday Ethics: Sorting Expectations by Values

  • In today's roll call question, fill in the sentence, "I expect . . ." with an expectation your have of yourself or others. For example, "I expect zags to be kind, I expect drivers to avoid distractions, I expect others to obey the law". (Notice how easy it is for you to generate these.) As you listen to each student's statement, try to decide whether it is an expectation related to morality or not ("I expect the light to turn green" is not). Also, try to identify the value or values associated with the expection.

Everyday Ethics: Mapping Conscience

  • One of the remarkable things about morality in humans is how we already know many "objective" things about norms even if we can't say exactly where we learned them. Consider the following list:
  • 1. You are not obligated to forgive the murderer of your father.
  • 2. Harming a child is one of the worst things you can do.
  • 3. You should not accept a gift, favor, or benefit from someone if you are not prepared to reciprocate in some way.
  • 4. It’s ok to tell a friend that their partner is cheating on them.
  • 5. If you feel someone is disrespectful to you, it is ok to share your experience with others.
  • 6. If a stranger asks you a very personal question, it’s ok to avoid answering, or even not tell them the truth.
  • 7. It’s okay to defend yourself.
  • 8. If your country is attacked, it’s okay to strike back.
  • 9. You shouldn’t complain if your friend chooses to help their family members over you.
  • 10. You should help your family over friends and strangers.
  • 11. Strangers in your community have a greater expectation of help from you than distant strangers.
  • 12. No one is obligated to be your friend.
  • 13. If your friend asks you for help, you shouldn’t ignore them.
  • 14. Some of the things you learn about an intimate partner should not be disclosed to others.
  • 15. If someone is your friend, they are obligated to some degree of loyalty, cooperation, and sympathetic interpretation of your motives and actions.
  • 16. If you are cooperating with someone as a partner, you should avoid disparaging them to others.
  • 17. If you choose to cooperate with someone, you need to make yourself answerable to them about things related to your cooperative tasks.
  • In your group discussion of this list, pick items and ask each other if they are true statements. Then, assuming it is, consider whether you learned this truth explicitly or implicitly. For example, is it something you were taught, learned by example, or implied by more general understandings you have of humans and human reality?

1st Writing and Dropbox practice (not due on today’s class)

  • Please write a 250 word maximum answer to the following question by Wednesday, January 24th, 11:59pm. This assignment will give us some initial writing to look at and give you practice with the dropbox protocol for turning in pseudonymous writing in the course. For this assignment, the writing itself is ungraded, but you will receive 15 points for following the instructions accurately.
  • Topic: Is it morally acceptable to gossip? If so, under what conditions and why? Does gossip serve a legitimate purpose? If so, what is it? [Note: Definitions of gossip are somewhat variable. For this assignment, gossip is "Sharing information about others that may be of a personal, embarrassing, or unflattering nature. Typically, when we gossip, we do not want the person(s) gossiped about to know that we have gossiped about them.
  • Prompt Advice: Try to make your position clear (the "what") and the reasons clear (the "why"). Good arguments also try to respond to objections and consider the most reasonable opposing views. Your position is likely to be stronger if it is qualified in various ways. I strongly encourage you to draft your answer the night before it is due and return to it on the night that it is due.
  • Advice about collaboration: Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, verbally. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples.
  1. To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [click here].
  2. Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs, but do indent the first line of each paragraph.
  3. Do not put your name in the file or filename. You may put your student ID number in the file. Always put a word count in the file. Save your file for this assignment with the name: Gossip.
  4. To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#0 1st Writing and Dropbox practice" dropbox.
  5. If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) before the deadline or you will lose points.