Difference between revisions of "FEB 28"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==12: FEB 28==
+
==12. FEB 28==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*Hibbing, John R., Kevin Smith, and John R. Alford, ''Predisposed'', Chapter 2, "Getting Into Bedrock with Politics". (26)
+
:*Van Tulleken, Chris, Ultra-Processed People, C1 "Why is there bacterial slime in my ice cream? The invention of UPF" (15-30; 15)
 +
:*Van Tulleken, Chris, C11, "UPF is pre-chewed" (171-180; 9)
 +
:*Van Tulleken, Chris, C15, "Dysregulatory bodies" (225-236; 11)
  
===Hibbing, et. al. ''Predisposed'' Chapter 2===
+
===In-Class===
  
:*Begins with allegations that universities are left-biased.  Points out counterexample in Russell.  Students can be more radical than even lefty faculty. City college story.  34ff: ironically its most lasting intellectual movement was neoconservatism.
+
:*Assign SW2, "Assessing Industrial Foods"
 
::*Point of story:
 
:::*1) Colleges' political orientations have little predictable effect on their students. (Think about this in relationship to Gonzaga.)
 
:::*2) Politics and political beliefs are fungible, change dep on time and place.  No discussions these days of Stalin-Trotskyism.  Or ADA, which conservatisms opposed. True, issues and labels change, but, acc to Hibbing et al, humans vary in orientation, politics is, at its core, dealing with a constant problem, invariable.  Found in "bedrock social dilemmas" (BSDs). 
 
  
:*Back to Aristotle
+
===Van Tulleken, Chris, Ultra-Processed People, C1 "Why is there bacterial slime in my ice cream? The invention of UPF" (15-30; 15)===
::* "Man" is by nature political.  -- Politics deep in our nature. But A also speculated that town life, while natural, was not original.  An achievement of sorts, not wholly natural. 
 
::*Evidence: GWAS (Gene wide association studies) studies suggest more influence from gene difference on political orientation than economic prefs.
 
::*Politics and Mating: Political orientation is one of the top correlate predicting mate selection.  (39). We do look for diff personality traits in a partner, but not when it comes to pol orientation (or drinking behavior and religion!).  Considers two objections: mates become similar over time or the correlation is an effect of the selection pool "social homogamy"  But no sign of convergence of orientation over time of relationship (but views on gender roles tend to diverge! ''Nota bene''!).  Studies controlling for demographic factors undermine second objection. 
 
  
::*Politics is connected to willingness to punish political difference. (Which helps explain our sensitivity to "political prosecution".) 40-41.   
+
:*Food Social justice issue (connects with our discussion last class) p. 17-18Do the cheap calories of UPF support the idea that they have a role to play in human nutrition? Or does it support the idea that UPF is a source of food injustice?
  
:*Differences Galore?
+
:*why does UPF ice cream not melt: Ice cream as a paradigm for UPF.   
::*Need to separate issues, labels, and bedrock social dilemmas.
 
::*'''Issues''' arise naturally in the society, but can also be "promoted" by actors and parties. 
 
::*'''Labels''' distinguish groups contesting issues.  They organize approaches to issues by orientation.  Practically, political parties do this, but also media.  Labels and parties shift over time, presumably as they compete for voters (or, "package them".) 
 
::*”Labels are simply the vocabulary employed to describe the reasonably systematic orientations toward issues that float around a polity at a given time.” 41
 
::*Label "liberal" - today means mildly libertarian, but liberal economic policy isn't libertarian at all (involves income transfer).  Mentions historical origin of Left/Right. Generally, liberals are more about equality and tolerance, but communists can be authoritarian.  Generally, conservatives focus on authority, hierarchy, and order (more than libs), but they often defend rights in ways that make common cause with liberals (protections from the gov't, free speech).   
 
  
::*Conclusion they are resisting: (43): political beliefs are so multidimensional and variable that left and right don't have any stable meaning. '''Ideology is fluid, but there are universals''' (regarding BSDs).
+
:*Emulsifiers
  
:*Commonality Reigns! Political Universals
+
:*Starches - some potato gastronomy (21), modified starches can replace fats and dairy, hold water during freezing and bulk out any sauce(Do you think you are fooling your brain?)
::*Bedrock social dilemmas (BSD): "core preferences about the organization, structure, and conduct of mass social life" 44
 
::*BSDS: leadership, decision-making, resource distribution, punishment, protection, and orientation to tradition vs change.
 
::*Questions associated with BSDs: How should we make decisions? What rules to follow? What do we do with rule violators? Should we try something new or stick with tradition?
 
::*Predispositions defined: political orientations that are biologically instantiatedthese differences are more stable than labels and issues.
 
::*Example of conceptual framework at work:  attitudes toward military intervention.  tells the story of changing conservative views of intervention, Lindbergh and the AFC.  Late 20th century conservatives were interventionists (commie domino theory), but early century conservatives were isolationists.  These changes make sense in relation to the bedrock challenge of dealing with external threats.  Shifting analysis of threats can change policy 180 degrees.  48: Pearl Harbor!
 
::*Example 2: Conservatives softening  on immigration after electoral defeats in 2012. Early politics leading to DACA? Conservatives still consistently more suspicious of out groups.  (heightened threat detection)
 
::*Note the possibilities: Same view of issue, different ideologies expressing different orientations (Vietnam).  Same orientation expressed in different ideologies and different positions on issues (Conservative isolationism before/after Pearl Harbor). 
 
  
::*Key point in the theory is that these "bedrock dilemmas" occur once cities become too large for people to know each otherInteresting point: We had to use principles to express ourselves about these BSDs because we couldn't influence each other directly.
+
:*Gums - bacterial exudates; used with starches for thickening, like sugar substitutes, may promote overweight.   
  
:*"Society works best when..."
+
:*Fats - aromatic molecules (of retronasal fame) all fat soluble. Fat is vehicle for flavor, also adds structure to foods. Butter an “inverted emulsion”.
::*Bold thesis: looking for universality as: consistent differences across time and cultureExample: ''Optimates'' and ''populares'' in Ancient Greece.  
+
::*Butter history! Napoleon era contest for subsitute: oleomargarine (still from animal fats).  HydrogenationCottonseed. Crisco is born - first mass produced fake lard.
::*Left and right have deep associationsleft handed suspect.
+
 
::*History of research on connection between core preferences on leadership, defense, punishment of norm violators, devotion to traditional behavioral standards, distribution of resources. LaponceHaidt's MFT.   
+
===Van Tulleken, Chris, C11, "UPF is pre-chewed"===
::*Look at the 4BSDs in relations to Haidt's MFT:   
+
 
:::*1. Adherence to tradition.  (Neophobia/philia)  
+
:*How does UPF affect the structure of food (palatability) and what are the behavioral implications of UPF?  
:::*2. Treatment of outgroups and rule breakers (cooperation, defection, threat)  (C, F, L)
+
 
:::*3. Role of group/individual (freeriding, self-interest, social commitment) (F, L)
+
:*Example of structure mattering - Apple studyJuice is pretty close to sugar soda.
:::*4. Authority and Leadership (Legitimate authority and hierarchy) (A)
+
 
::*"Society works best Index" 2007 research "Predicted issue attitudes, ideological self-placement, and party identification with astonishing accuracy" .6 correlationPursuing international research with SWBNote this is "synchronous" research. A snapshot of both BSD and Issue orientation.   We will see similar empirical support for the MFT in Haidt, C8.
+
:*Coco Puffs, McD hamburgers, UPF bread.  Speed of eating higher, no time to signal satiety to brain.
 +
 
 +
:*Social justice issue - food deserts often have no UPF bread, real bread expensive. 
 +
 
 +
:*UPF may be changing our jaws.
 +
 
 +
:*UPF consumed at higher rates.  (Barbara Rolls is important.  We’ll read her theory of “volumetrics”.). Some evidence of genetic disposition toward fast eating also.   
 +
 
 +
:*Unprocessed to processed to UPF (Nova scale) - calories per minute: 36, 54, 69.
 +
 
 +
===Van Tulleken, Chris, C15, "Dysregulatory bodies" ===
 +
 
 +
:*Different approaches to drugs v foods.   
 +
 
 +
:*Corn oil isn’t just made from squeezing corn.  Read at 226.  Could be “corn oil” on the label and have lots of additives from processing. 
 +
 
 +
:*Three approaches a food company can take with FDA.  Full review, register additive as a GRAS (generally recognized as safe), “self-determination” that additive is a GRAS.  Backlog of GRAS applications led to interpretation allowing self-determination. 
 +
 
 +
:*Experts cited in the chapter reviewed additive applications. Critical of Corn Oil ONE’s application.  Wrong molecule!  
 +
 
 +
:*Concern about hormonal changes from additive connected to low fertility rates.  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6079277/]
 +
 
 +
:*No complete list of approved additives.  Maybe 10,0000, of which 1,000 self-determined.  (Elsewhere in the book we learn the EU list is about 2,000.).
 +
 
 +
:*Example of trans fats.  If they had been self-approved, we wouldn’t know about them. 
 +
 
 +
:*Flavor ingredient regulation 232ff. Self-determined approval of 2,600 ingredients. Example of isoeugenol.
 +
 
 +
:*Effects of additives fall disporportionately on the poor and low SES. 
 +
 
 +
:*EU regulation is better, but also problems.  Ethical issues of the regulatory process: $2 billion and 100 million experiemental animals.
 +
 
 +
===SW2: Assessing Industrial Foods===
 +
 
 +
:*'''Stage 1''': Please write an 800 hundred word maximum answer to the following question by '''Monday, March 4, 2024, 11:59pm.'''
 +
::*Topic: We have been assessing industrial food primarily from the writings of Moss, Schatzker, and van Tulleken. In the first 500-600 words of your essay, draw upon these authors to answer these two questions: What are the primary concerns about processed and ultra-processed foods?  What evidence supports these concerns?  Then, in remainder of your essay, consider the social justice dimensions of industrial foods.  Do they solve a problem of food insecurity or do you see them as an unjust way of limiting the health and life prospects of relatively poor eaters who can only afford industrial food?
 +
 
 +
:*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate.  I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''.  Collaboration  is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class.  The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer.  Keep it verbal.  Generate your own examples. 
 +
 
 +
:*Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. '''You will lose points''' if you do not follow these instructions:
 +
 
 +
::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]].
 +
::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.   
 +
::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''You may put your student ID number in the file, but '''not in the filename'''. Save your file for this assignment with the name: "IndustrialFoods".
 +
::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#0 - SW2 - Assessing Industrial Foods" dropbox.  
 +
::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points. 
 +
 
 +
:*'''To accomodate the timing of Spring Break, we will skip peer review for this assignment.'''
 +
 
 +
:*'''Stage 2''': I will grade and briefly comment on your writing.

Latest revision as of 21:54, 28 February 2024

12. FEB 28

Assigned Work

  • Van Tulleken, Chris, Ultra-Processed People, C1 "Why is there bacterial slime in my ice cream? The invention of UPF" (15-30; 15)
  • Van Tulleken, Chris, C11, "UPF is pre-chewed" (171-180; 9)
  • Van Tulleken, Chris, C15, "Dysregulatory bodies" (225-236; 11)

In-Class

  • Assign SW2, "Assessing Industrial Foods"

Van Tulleken, Chris, Ultra-Processed People, C1 "Why is there bacterial slime in my ice cream? The invention of UPF" (15-30; 15)

  • Food Social justice issue (connects with our discussion last class) p. 17-18. Do the cheap calories of UPF support the idea that they have a role to play in human nutrition? Or does it support the idea that UPF is a source of food injustice?
  • why does UPF ice cream not melt: Ice cream as a paradigm for UPF.
  • Emulsifiers
  • Starches - some potato gastronomy (21), modified starches can replace fats and dairy, hold water during freezing and bulk out any sauce. (Do you think you are fooling your brain?)
  • Gums - bacterial exudates; used with starches for thickening, like sugar substitutes, may promote overweight.
  • Fats - aromatic molecules (of retronasal fame) all fat soluble. Fat is vehicle for flavor, also adds structure to foods. Butter an “inverted emulsion”.
  • Butter history! Napoleon era contest for subsitute: oleomargarine (still from animal fats). Hydrogenation. Cottonseed. Crisco is born - first mass produced fake lard.

Van Tulleken, Chris, C11, "UPF is pre-chewed"

  • How does UPF affect the structure of food (palatability) and what are the behavioral implications of UPF?
  • Example of structure mattering - Apple study. Juice is pretty close to sugar soda.
  • Coco Puffs, McD hamburgers, UPF bread. Speed of eating higher, no time to signal satiety to brain.
  • Social justice issue - food deserts often have no UPF bread, real bread expensive.
  • UPF may be changing our jaws.
  • UPF consumed at higher rates. (Barbara Rolls is important. We’ll read her theory of “volumetrics”.). Some evidence of genetic disposition toward fast eating also.
  • Unprocessed to processed to UPF (Nova scale) - calories per minute: 36, 54, 69.

Van Tulleken, Chris, C15, "Dysregulatory bodies"

  • Different approaches to drugs v foods.
  • Corn oil isn’t just made from squeezing corn. Read at 226. Could be “corn oil” on the label and have lots of additives from processing.
  • Three approaches a food company can take with FDA. Full review, register additive as a GRAS (generally recognized as safe), “self-determination” that additive is a GRAS. Backlog of GRAS applications led to interpretation allowing self-determination.
  • Experts cited in the chapter reviewed additive applications. Critical of Corn Oil ONE’s application. Wrong molecule!
  • Concern about hormonal changes from additive connected to low fertility rates. [1]
  • No complete list of approved additives. Maybe 10,0000, of which 1,000 self-determined. (Elsewhere in the book we learn the EU list is about 2,000.).
  • Example of trans fats. If they had been self-approved, we wouldn’t know about them.
  • Flavor ingredient regulation 232ff. Self-determined approval of 2,600 ingredients. Example of isoeugenol.
  • Effects of additives fall disporportionately on the poor and low SES.
  • EU regulation is better, but also problems. Ethical issues of the regulatory process: $2 billion and 100 million experiemental animals.

SW2: Assessing Industrial Foods

  • Stage 1: Please write an 800 hundred word maximum answer to the following question by Monday, March 4, 2024, 11:59pm.
  • Topic: We have been assessing industrial food primarily from the writings of Moss, Schatzker, and van Tulleken. In the first 500-600 words of your essay, draw upon these authors to answer these two questions: What are the primary concerns about processed and ultra-processed foods? What evidence supports these concerns? Then, in remainder of your essay, consider the social justice dimensions of industrial foods. Do they solve a problem of food insecurity or do you see them as an unjust way of limiting the health and life prospects of relatively poor eaters who can only afford industrial food?
  • Advice about collaboration: Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, verbally. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples.
  • Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions:
  1. To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [click here].
  2. Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.
  3. Do not put your name in the file or filename. You may put your student ID number in the file, but not in the filename. Save your file for this assignment with the name: "IndustrialFoods".
  4. To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#0 - SW2 - Assessing Industrial Foods" dropbox.
  5. If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) before the deadline or you will lose points.
  • To accomodate the timing of Spring Break, we will skip peer review for this assignment.
  • Stage 2: I will grade and briefly comment on your writing.