Difference between revisions of "Assignment Rubric"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→Flow) |
m (→Logic) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| __TOC__ | | __TOC__ | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Flow=== | ===Flow=== | ||
Consists of some of the basic elements of good writing: Word choice, sentence structure, paragraph unity, transitions, general organization. | Consists of some of the basic elements of good writing: Word choice, sentence structure, paragraph unity, transitions, general organization. | ||
| − | |||
*'''7''' Demonstrates superior control of all elements of good writing. | *'''7''' Demonstrates superior control of all elements of good writing. | ||
*'''5''' Demonstrates sufficient control of the elements of good writing to express ideas with reasonable clarity and organization. | *'''5''' Demonstrates sufficient control of the elements of good writing to express ideas with reasonable clarity and organization. | ||
*'''3''' Has some problems with expression which could be improved by more attention to basic elements of good writing. | *'''3''' Has some problems with expression which could be improved by more attention to basic elements of good writing. | ||
*'''1''' The author’s basic meaning is difficult to infer reliably due to insufficient control of several elements of good writing | *'''1''' The author’s basic meaning is difficult to infer reliably due to insufficient control of several elements of good writing | ||
| − | |||
===Content=== | ===Content=== | ||
| − | + | This rubric dimension is satisfied by an accurate and complete representation ''of course resources and readings'' relevant to answering the question or topic posed by the paper prompt, as well as careful description of relevant studies, theories and concepts. | |
| − | This rubric dimension is satisfied by an accurate and complete representation of | + | *'''7''' Excellent selection and use of information, theories, and concepts. Presents a complete and detailed picture of the view, issue, or idea under discussion. The content addresses the thesis and the thesis addresses the topic. |
| − | + | *'''5''' Has most of the information, theories, and concepts needed to answer the question. Very few, if any, inaccuracies. | |
| − | '''7''' Excellent selection and use of information, theories, and concepts. Presents a complete and detailed picture of the view, issue, or idea under discussion. | + | *'''3''' Missing some important elements of a complete answer to the question, and/or some significant inaccuracies. The content of the paper is not always focused on the thesis or the paper prompt. |
| − | + | *'''1''' Missing substantial elements of the answer and / or includes irrelevant or inaccurate information. The paper is not focused on the topic. | |
| − | '''5''' Has most of the information, theories, and concepts needed to answer the question. Very few, if any, inaccuracies. | ||
| − | |||
| − | '''3''' Missing some important elements of a complete answer to the question, and/or some significant inaccuracies. | ||
| − | |||
| − | '''1''' Missing substantial elements of the answer and / or includes irrelevant or inaccurate information. | ||
===Logic=== | ===Logic=== | ||
| + | The writing is organized by a clearly articulated thesis or central idea and is well supported with information, reflection, and argumentative or explanatory rationales. In extended writing the thesis is defended and developed by considering alternative versions and opposing views. | ||
| − | + | *'''7''' A Strong thesis or organizing idea, well-chosen information, and clearly articulated rationales and support. The writing acknowledges and considers alternative ways of thinking. | |
| − | + | *'''5''' A good thesis, supported adequately. | |
| − | '''7''' | + | *'''3''' The thesis has some problems. It may be a little vague, overly general or specific, or doesn’t adequately address the prompt. There is support, though it may not always be clearly stated or as substantial as needed for the thesis. |
| − | + | *'''1''' Not much sign of a thesis or a supported position. Or, a very weak thesis and supporting evidence and argumentation is incomplete, disorganized, or inaccurate. | |
| − | '''5''' A good thesis, | ||
| − | |||
| − | '''3''' The thesis has some problems | ||
| − | |||
| − | '''1''' Not much sign of a thesis | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 03:33, 1 November 2023
Flow
Consists of some of the basic elements of good writing: Word choice, sentence structure, paragraph unity, transitions, general organization.
- 7 Demonstrates superior control of all elements of good writing.
- 5 Demonstrates sufficient control of the elements of good writing to express ideas with reasonable clarity and organization.
- 3 Has some problems with expression which could be improved by more attention to basic elements of good writing.
- 1 The author’s basic meaning is difficult to infer reliably due to insufficient control of several elements of good writing
Content
This rubric dimension is satisfied by an accurate and complete representation of course resources and readings relevant to answering the question or topic posed by the paper prompt, as well as careful description of relevant studies, theories and concepts.
- 7 Excellent selection and use of information, theories, and concepts. Presents a complete and detailed picture of the view, issue, or idea under discussion. The content addresses the thesis and the thesis addresses the topic.
- 5 Has most of the information, theories, and concepts needed to answer the question. Very few, if any, inaccuracies.
- 3 Missing some important elements of a complete answer to the question, and/or some significant inaccuracies. The content of the paper is not always focused on the thesis or the paper prompt.
- 1 Missing substantial elements of the answer and / or includes irrelevant or inaccurate information. The paper is not focused on the topic.
Logic
The writing is organized by a clearly articulated thesis or central idea and is well supported with information, reflection, and argumentative or explanatory rationales. In extended writing the thesis is defended and developed by considering alternative versions and opposing views.
- 7 A Strong thesis or organizing idea, well-chosen information, and clearly articulated rationales and support. The writing acknowledges and considers alternative ways of thinking.
- 5 A good thesis, supported adequately.
- 3 The thesis has some problems. It may be a little vague, overly general or specific, or doesn’t adequately address the prompt. There is support, though it may not always be clearly stated or as substantial as needed for the thesis.
- 1 Not much sign of a thesis or a supported position. Or, a very weak thesis and supporting evidence and argumentation is incomplete, disorganized, or inaccurate.
