Difference between revisions of "Alfino"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
−
Conference: [http://philevents.org/event/show/25482]
+
:*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Self and IF]]
 +
:*[[Alfino - Fall 2016 - Work on Philosophy of Food]]
  
−
NYRB review of Garton Ash's new book on Free Speech. [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/09/29/timothy-garton-ash-free-speech-say-what-you-will/]
+
==Notes for Seminar Discussions==
−
Chronical Editorial from Columbia U president Lee Bollinger, "The No-Censorship Approach to Life" [http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-No-Censorship-Approach-to/237807/]
 
  
−
==Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"==
+
===SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford===
  
−
:*starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offensive Speech) that a deeper explanation for changes in attutudes toward intellectual freedom would need to take into account changes in the way we think about the self.
+
:*Hadot - "ethics of discussion" -
  
−
===General Notes ===
+
:*Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles.  p. 29  Implications for style/method.
 +
::*Chapter 2:  up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives)
  
−
:*enlightenment self -- characterized by rights, autonomy, freedom of expression, but also toleration.  Not defined by gender, race, orientation.   
+
:*Crawford - Chapters 3, "Virtual Reality as a Moral Ideal"
−
:*track critiques -- disembodied, disconnected from tradition, identity, religion moves to the private sphere, (find article to do this)
+
::*child will vs. adult will.  situated, freedom of modern self depends on being insulated from contingency by layers of representation.
−
:*need to understand how Enlightenment distinguished the private self from the public self.   
+
::*Mouseke-doer -- "Oh Tootles!"  The Handy Dandy machine.  focused on adjustment, 72 q. to become an adult you need to be subject to the "heteronomy of things"
−
:*what's new?  postmodern self, digital self, and therapeutic self (research both)
+
::*Keep the world from challenging the self is something narcissists do.   
 +
::*Kant: does this in his moral theory -- 73: quote  -- context -- concern about the status of free will
 +
::*To be rational, for Kant, is to NOT be situated in the world.  Choice as expression of the unconditioned will.
 +
::*77: interesting connection to problem of the modern self -- kant's model of the self leads to a self that is fragile, can't tolerate contingency, seeks to be comfortable in a "me-world" of manufactured experience. (this might be the kind of self that demands insulation for it's views and identity.  freedom from conflict.
 +
::*thesis (he's heading toward): There is freedom and individuality in the world beyond your head, but only if you acquire the skills.
  
−
:*Sources:
+
:*Crawford - Chapter 4, "Attention and Design"
−
::*Taylor -- sources of the self
 
−
::*Kant's odd distinction between public and private roles
 
−
::*Declaration of Universal Rights of Man
 
  
−
:*Hypotheses:
+
::*Mercedes "brake assist" - fetish of automaticity -- product of capitalism.  fake engine noise 85
−
::*Could it be that we are witnessing the "re-embodiment" of the self following the Enlightenment abstraction of the political subject?
+
::*"The World is its Own Best Model"  - embodied representations vs. symbolic representations.  importance of "cross modal binding" 83. 
−
::*Could it be that we are changing the way we divide public and private spaces (partly because of the new possibilities of a digitally mediated self)?
+
::*problem at the end - does a world of symbolic representations undermine real choice?  Is capitalism designing things to foster disengagement (autism)? (counter argument - aren't we developing skills with virtual reality? symbolic reality?
−
::*Maybe the ideals of liberty of thought that Mill articulated were never realistic. I mean he was a pretty strange guy.
 
  
−
===Critical issues===
+
:*Dennett, Chapter 3
  
−
::*Assuming there is a problem in our historical relationship to freedom of conscience.  Is there?  Evidence from recent years: right not to be offended, right to be forgotten, challenges to academic freedom -- deplatforming, trigger warnings, reporting of faculty for perceived aggression. 
+
:*Section 9. Three species of Goulding: Rathering, Piling On, and the Gould two-step.
−
:*Sources of Enlightenment self (ripped from some Harvard professors' lecture series):
 
−
::* Lockean theory of self -- first modern theory of personal identity
 
−
::* Universal Declaration of Human Rights
 
−
::* Mill's self in On Liberty
 
−
::* Hume scepticism of self
 
−
::* The London Journal -- Boswell's diary 1762
 
−
::* Rousseau's "Confessions of a Solitary Walker" 
 
−
::* Romanticism and the interiority of the self
 
−
::* Franklin
 
−
::* Adam Smith -- self as economic/moral agent
 
−
::* Dangerous Liasons -- self as duplicitous
 
−
:*Sources of Modern Self
 
−
::*Cartesian Self
 
−
::*Heliocentrism
 
−
::*Christianity (context)
 
  
−
:*Searches:
+
:*"rathering" - really false dichotomy with a rhetorical flourish, "rather" - nice mix of informal fallacy and rhetoric.
−
::*Philosophers Index: self and enlightenment, enlightenmnet and lib of thought or IF, digital self
+
:*"piling on" - example p. 50.  exaggerating the alternative that he wants to dismiss (false dichotomy mixed with straw man"
 +
:*"two step" - creating a straw man version of an opponents argument and then treating the author's actual position as a grudging acceptance that the author really sees the problem with the straw man version.
  
−
===Digital Self===
 
  
−
::*uploading of self -- transhumanism
+
:*
−
::*social media -- updatin gstatus, managing a public/private self. 
 
−
::*old model:  public vs. private 
 
−
::*new model: pulbic, public-private, private
 
−

 

Latest revision as of 23:45, 27 September 2016

Notes for Seminar Discussions

SEP 27 - Hadot, Pinker, Dennett, Crawford

  • Hadot - "ethics of discussion" -
  • Pinker - note intersection of discussion of classical style and obscure styles. p. 29 Implications for style/method.
  • Chapter 2: up to 38, a discussion of classical style, then sections on "metadiscourse", signposting, hedging, spologetic language, excessive abstraction (nominalization and passives)
  • Crawford - Chapters 3, "Virtual Reality as a Moral Ideal"
  • child will vs. adult will. situated, freedom of modern self depends on being insulated from contingency by layers of representation.
  • Mouseke-doer -- "Oh Tootles!" The Handy Dandy machine. focused on adjustment, 72 q. to become an adult you need to be subject to the "heteronomy of things"
  • Keep the world from challenging the self is something narcissists do.
  • Kant: does this in his moral theory -- 73: quote -- context -- concern about the status of free will
  • To be rational, for Kant, is to NOT be situated in the world. Choice as expression of the unconditioned will.
  • 77: interesting connection to problem of the modern self -- kant's model of the self leads to a self that is fragile, can't tolerate contingency, seeks to be comfortable in a "me-world" of manufactured experience. (this might be the kind of self that demands insulation for it's views and identity. freedom from conflict.
  • thesis (he's heading toward): There is freedom and individuality in the world beyond your head, but only if you acquire the skills.
  • Crawford - Chapter 4, "Attention and Design"
  • Mercedes "brake assist" - fetish of automaticity -- product of capitalism. fake engine noise 85
  • "The World is its Own Best Model" - embodied representations vs. symbolic representations. importance of "cross modal binding" 83.
  • problem at the end - does a world of symbolic representations undermine real choice? Is capitalism designing things to foster disengagement (autism)? (counter argument - aren't we developing skills with virtual reality? symbolic reality?
  • Dennett, Chapter 3
  • Section 9. Three species of Goulding: Rathering, Piling On, and the Gould two-step.
  • "rathering" - really false dichotomy with a rhetorical flourish, "rather" - nice mix of informal fallacy and rhetoric.
  • "piling on" - example p. 50. exaggerating the alternative that he wants to dismiss (false dichotomy mixed with straw man"
  • "two step" - creating a straw man version of an opponents argument and then treating the author's actual position as a grudging acceptance that the author really sees the problem with the straw man version.


Retrieved from "http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php?title=Alfino&oldid=18009"