Difference between revisions of "JAN 27"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==3: JAN 27== ===Assigned=== :*RQ1: Reading Quiz #1 :*Sapolsky, Robert. Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (580-613) :*Henrich,...")
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==3: JAN 27==
+
==3. JAN 27==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*RQ1: Reading Quiz #1
+
:*Sonnenbergs, C 6, "A Gut Feeling"
:*Sapolsky, Robert. Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (580-613)
 
  
:*Henrich, Joseph, "Hell, Free Will, and Moral Universalism" from ''The WEIRDEST People on Earth'' p. 146-148, (2)
+
===In-class===
  
===Reading Quiz===
+
:*Practicality: Comments on food budgets and variety
 +
:*Satisfaction/Practicality/Nutrition: A 50cent egg lesson - $10/loaf bread.
  
:*Please take this quiz.  You may take your time with the questions, but you are meant to work from memory for this quiz. '''Do not''' try to look things up or "speed read" to find answers. This will delay the class, reduce the fairness of the grading, and, of course, deny you the information the quiz is intended to provide.
+
===The NSP Model for Dietary Change: What Should your Food Budget Be?===
:*Link:
 
  
===Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will===
+
::*Some country comparisons: [https://www.vox.com/2014/7/6/5874499/map-heres-how-much-every-country-spends-on-food] and within the US: [https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/food-prices-and-spending/].  Generally, American's spend under 10% of disposable income on food vs. about 14-17% for Italians, French, etc.  These are rough comparisons because of wealth effects and geographic effects. Norwegians are wealthier than Americans, Italians a bit less wealthy, but Mediterranean cultures have closer access to inexpensive fresh food.
 +
::*At $20/hr, if you spend 14% of net monthly income on food, you would have about $400 to spend.  You also use this figures to think about what a just or "living wage" would be. That $20 wage certainly cannot fund high rent prices and a healthy plant based diet.
  
====Tear ducts and guilty animals====
+
===The NSP Model for Dietary Change: Three 50cent egg lessons===
  
:*Discusses professional interaction between biologists and legal scholars that may have started “neurolaw”.
+
:*A $10 loaf of bread?
 +
:*Quality differences in pineapple.
 +
:*Ultra-processed tomato sauce [https://www.amazon.com/Prego-Pasta-Sauce-Traditional-oz/dp/B00IAE65L6/ref=asc_df_B00IAE65L6?mcid=e671b47927bd3419baec03b60c8bb28c&hvocijid=1847674066337950316-B00IAE65L6-&hvexpln=73&tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=721245378154&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=1847674066337950316&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9033780&hvtargid=pla-2281435175938&th=1] v. canned, imported from Italy [https://www.amazon.com/Cento-Marzano-Organic-Peeled-Tomatoes/dp/B0045W29XK/ref=sr_1_1_pp?crid=2R25TRVDXCSTQ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.K1vqmE2uLAy598ZkSCPw2qmM9GzOVBneR0RNsg2Zvx0HPLSdt06ELfNgwrg3WQImT_pb_29q5lqJ6sPuPun3Fpq0Bfz_GrkZItoV459Z359FnWfbiEHmOm6TZpgoHtTGlDPwbarY_NP2oOBMQ3Y9XIg3B5Wgu1q11BLYeVz57YjpHkDItzwT-KVeERfsAspCantkS3loajmbsODYziKIX5ozQoDXZ6vm_aCu3maeewiDPrm1HPko324kdo1-aUFCjMcDfz9R9mOGSkaGolzwSyae-Q_thuXWpjCNlucYMtARFtrln4ZolMLTFR9BJ1wrwZDtNgScsL_U8oYHGgO3KAi8P8jhhYJezrpzxkGq7pw.zf9gmKUsKHXi-4FX5ddDjl5EYfQP1OS75GjR4iIplfI&dib_tag=se&keywords=cento+san+marzano+canned+tomatoes&qid=1737997646&rdc=1&s=grocery&sprefix=Cento+%2Cgrocery%2C261&sr=1-1]
  
:*Radical claim: Current criminal justice system needs to be replaced. (Not talking about policing, right?)
+
===The NSP Model for Dietary ChangeComparing notes on variety expectations===
  
:*Things outside his focus: science in courtroom, min IQ for death sentence, cognitive bias in jurors, cognitive privacy.
+
:*Today we will start discussing how the NSP model helps us think about dietary change.
  
:*583: historic example of scientific evidence disrupting criteria for guilt in witches trials, mid-16th century.  Older women might not be able to cry.
+
:*[[Nutrition, Satisfaction, Practicality and Dietary Change]]
  
====Three Perspectives====
+
:*General “false practicality” point:  How practical is the drive-through fast food option?  How much time does it take?  How does it makes you feel while eating, after eating?  Do you notice blood sugar spikes from ff?  How long until you feel hunger again?
  
:*Takes a middle position between believing we are always free and never free.
+
:*Small group exercise.  Today we’ll focus on some “Satisfaction-Practicality” connections relevant to designing / re-designing your diet.  Specifically, consider these questions as you head into small group discussion to hear others’ approaches and thinking.
  
::*no one now disputes that we sometimes are not free (epilepsy example).  Yet medieval europe tried animals for guilt.  (Sounds weirder than it is.  Just imagine it's about the act, not criminal intent.)
+
::*How much variety do you expect from breakfast, lunch, and dinner? Make a list.  
  
====Drawing Lines in the Sand 586====
+
::*How many different dinners would you need in your repertoire to feel like you had plenty of good choices? What is involved in "provisioning" those dinners?
  
:*endorses a broad compatibilism and the idea of “moral failure”He develops the competing concept, “Mitigated free will,” read at 587-588.
+
::*Types of variety:
 +
:::*I want to come home knowing that I can choose from X different dinners depending on mood and conditions.  (Home menu model)
 +
:::*I want my shopping to give me X dinners to choose from.  It’s ok if variety decreases as the week goes by.  (Variety Shopping model)
 +
:::*I’m ok scheduling each dinner by the days of the week(Days of week meal planning.)
  
:*Ultimately, Sapolsky will try to show that this view doesn’t hold up, in part because it depends up arbitrary use of a “homonculus” to explain things. But he's still a compatibilist on free will.  
+
::*Other variety considerations:
 +
:::*I don’t want to repeat meals much within a week.
 +
:::*I’m fine eating the same thing for 2-3 nights or alternating 2 dinners over 4 days.
 +
:::*I look for variety seasonally.
 +
:::*I can eat the same breakfast for months, but then I need to change it.
  
:*1842: M’NaghtenRule at 587. Mentally ill murdererMany objected to his not being found guilty. John Hinckley.
+
::*Other sources of variety
 +
:::*Seasonal rotations -
 +
:::*Preparation variety - three pastas - tomato, primavera, ceci(!).
 +
:::*Make-shift dinners(I can sometimes just make a salad and side veg for dinner.) Note the nutrition/practicality issues hereEasy to do and very practical if you are on top of your nutrition. You could add a protein shake.
  
:*"mitigated free will" homonculus view: we all more or less think this way and then the problem of responsibility comes down to figuring out what to expect from the humonculus.  What is it capable of or should have been capable of.
+
===The Enteric-Central Nervous System Axis===
  
====Age, Maturity of Groups, Maturity of Individuals====
+
[[file:Microbiota-gut-Brain image2.jpg]]
  
:*2005 case Roper v. Simmons.  Age limit of 18 on executions and life terms.  Follow debates on this. 590.  Note, in particular, O'Connor and Scalia's dissenting argument.  (Note also, that the need to draw these lines at all follows from the commitment to "mitigated free will".) 
+
===Sonnenbergs, C 6, "A Gut Feeling"===
  
:*2010 and 2012 cases on rehab for juvies. '''age related bounds on free will''' (in the justice system).
+
:*'''The Brain-Gut Axis'''
 +
::*Documents the two-way comm bt brain and gut (enteric nervous system). Gut brain is "listening" in on the trillions of microbes in the gut.
  
:*”grossly impaired rationality”Neurolaw critic Stephen Morse concedes that destruction of deliberative centers in frontal cortex defeats MREspecially relevant to the high correlation bt violent offenders and physical child abuse. (Horrible.)
+
::*Central nervous system (sympathetic and parsympathetic)Autonomic functions like heart rate include "transit rate" of food, secretion of acid in stomach and mucus in intestinesHypothalmoic-ituitary adrenal axis (HPA) controls hormones that affect digestion.
  
:*Gazzaniga’s view: responsibility compatible with lack of free willResponsibility is a social level concern. Time course of decision making.  (Sapolsky has trouble with this, but it's really the first interpretation and that's just "illusionism" for philosophers of MR.)
+
::*Gut bacteria can influence our perception of the world and behavior:
 +
::*serotonin production
 +
::*toxplasma gondii (rodents and cats)
 +
::*microbe free mice are bigger risk takersCritical phase in correcting for this.  
 +
::*mice with impaired microbiota had worse memory (141)
  
::*disputes about the maturity of adolescents: APA has spoken both ways in court: not mature enough for criminal resp., but mature enough to make an abortion decisionBut Sapolsky cites Steinberg: aborition decisions and decisions to shoot occur on different time scales.
+
::*Speculate symbiotic relationship -- microbes likely improve fitness through risk aversion and memory.
 +
::*Mechanisms -- gut bacteria produce chemicals that go into blood stream.   
  
:*Causation and Compulsion -- not everything that causes us to act is a compulsion, but for some, it is.
+
:*'''The Personality Transplant'''
 +
::*More evidence of effects on perception and behavior:
 +
::*2011 McMaster study: fecal transplants between anxious and gregarious strains of mice partially reversed behavior. Mechanisms: Brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) - associated with depression, schizophrenia, and OCD.  Gregarious mice has increase in BDNF after transplant. Intermediate mechanisms not completely clear. "How can a bacteria at the end of your digestive tract change the expression of a protein at the top of your skull?"
  
::*works through example of schizophrenic hearing voicesNot all cases would be compulsion"If your friend suggests that you mug someone, the law expects you to resist, even if it's an imaginary friend in your head." “thus in this view even a sensible homunculus can lose it and agree to virtually anything, just to get the hellhounds and trombones to stop.” 593
+
:*'''An unsupervised drug factory'''
 +
::*144: MACS (microbiotically available carbs) produce SCFAs, but also many other compounds, including toxins that normal kidneys filterLots to learn.  Some stimulate appetite.  Many products may be neutural with respect to fitnessThey imagine a hypothetical scenario in which a pectin digesting bacterium takes up residence in your gut. Maybe it has mutated to also stimulate your desire for fruit.
  
:*Starting a behavior vs. halting it. ("free won't")
+
:*'''The Microbiota's Toxic Waste'''
::*Libet experiment, 1980s, EEG disclosure of “readiness potential” — activity measured before conscious awareness of will.  .5 second delay might just be artifact of experiment designTime it takes to interpret the clockLibet says maybe the lag time is the time you have to veto the action your body is preparing you for (“free won’t”)
+
::*Hepatic encephalopathy -- treatments target microbes that produce toxins. Earlier treatments required removing some length of intestines.   
 +
::*TMAO - trimethylamine-N-oxide. produced by microbes. implicated in cardiovascular diseaseRed meat and fatty foods increase TMAOVegans and vegetarians have low TMAO production.  Study on long term vegan who eats a steak.  Still low TMAO.  Might be lacking those microbes.  (might argue for low meat consumption as nearly healthful as total meat abstinence)
  
::*Sapolsky’s view is that these debates reflect a consensus about the interaction of biology and free will, whatever that is.   
+
:*'''Two-way communication between "brains"'''
 +
::*Stress, IBS, Autism, and angry faces
 +
::*Induce stress in mice and their microbiota change. Threats cause symp n.s. to do lots of things, including slowing motility and digestion.  (maybe to prep us for action)
 +
::*Some stress events have long term effect on microbiota. 150
 +
::*IBS - read - could be a stress induced imbalance that is hard to correct because it gives you MB that also induce stress.  also heightened pain perception. Read at 151.
 +
::*Some evidence in animal models that probiotics can help with psychological problems (psychobiotics)Some studies in humans suggest this as well.  Better studies needed.
  
:*”You must be smart” vs. “You must have worked so hard” - research of Carol Dweck, 90s, saying that a kid worked hard to get a result increases motivation.   
+
:*'''Chemical spills out of the gut'''
 +
::*ASD - autism spectrum disorders. Increasing dramatically. Often associated with gut symptoms.  [https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html] Note connection to rise of industrial diets!
 +
::*ASD research: 2013 Caltech studies by Mazmanian - looked at maternal immune response to infection during pregnancy.  Treatment with b. fragilis helped somewhat in mice, both with leaky gut and behavioral symptoms.  Effect might involve other microbes.  B. fragilis affected over 100 other compounds in blood.  Human/mice diffs are significant hereCaution.
  
::*596: we tend to assign aptitude to biology and effort and resisting impulse to free will.  Sapolsky seems very skeptical that we can justify assigning character (impulse control anyway) to non-biological factors (fairy dust).  "Of all the stances of mitigated free will, the one that assigns aptitude to biology and effort to free will, or impulse to biology and resisting it to free will, is the most permeating and destructive." 598. 
+
:*'''Fermented Foods'''
 
+
::*2013 UCLA fMRI study on probiotic yogurt and response to negative facial emotions.
:*some evidence that pedophilia is not freely chosen or easily resisted. 
 
 
 
:*chart showing how we divide things between biology and “homoncular grit”. — Long list of ways out biology influence the items on the right. 
 
 
 
:*Conclusions: “worked hard/must be smart” are equally grounded in our physical nature. 
 
 
 
====But does anything useful actually come of this?====
 
 
 
:*Grounds for skepticism about using neuroscience in the courtroom:  Stephen Morse.  Neurolaw sceptic, ok with M’naugton rule and diminished capacity, but thinks cases are rare.  Reviews valid criticisms he makes: 1. Juries might overvalue neuroscience images, 2. Descriptive vs. Normative. 
 
 
 
:*Morse supports a strong distinction between causation and compulsion.  Causation is not itself an excuse.  But Sapolsky argues that this still involves walling off a “homonculus” and that’s not plausible. 
 
 
 
:*Acknowledges an apparent problem.  Neuroscience typically can’t predict individual behavior very much.  Fictional exchange with prosecutor.  600
 
 
 
:*Explaining lots and Predicting Little
 
 
 
:*But is the lack of predictive power a problem in the argument?  S. works through some cases in which probability of prediction decreases, but it's still biology.  Claim: it's not biology vs. non-biology, '''but qualitatively different aspects of our biology'''.  601
 
 
 
:*602: Important methodological point:  There's no less biology in the leg fracture vs. the other disorders, but level of biological explanation is different.  Leg fractures are less connected to culture. Behavior is multifactorial and heavily cultural.  (Oh god, another Henrich digression.  Free will has a history.) Example: how much does biology predict depression?  Factors are diverse biological mechanisms, including cultural factors. (But, point is, someone can be disable by depression, just like the leg fracture.)
 
 
 
:*Marvin Minsky, “Free will: internal forces I do not understand”. Sapolsky adds “yet”.
 
 
 
:*Neat charts showing historic trend to connect social behavior and biology in research journals. 604-605.
 
 
 
====How They will know us (A view from history given the trends.)====
 
 
 
:*If you still believe in mitigated free will:
 
 
 
::*case of Dramer and Springer and the spiritual explanation for epilepsy. Biblical version with Jesus. 
 
 
 
::*Sapolsky imagines an Inquisitor (witch burner).  Must be puzzled occasionally by fact pattern. Mom has epilepsy. 
 
 
 
::*growth of knowledge argument 607-608.  read list.  Most likely option is that our kids will look at us as idiots about moral responsibility and culpability.
 
 
 
:*608: practical outcomes.  Not about letting violent criminals free.  On the biological view, punishment can’t be an end in itself (restoring balance). Retributive punishment is an end in itself. 
 
 
 
:*mentions Josh Greene and Cohen's article on Neuroscience and the law (In your links.) Specifically (with respect, Sapolsky misses this one), the make the point that neuroscience might not change the law so much as change our intuitions about how to view people who screw up.)
 
 
 
:*'''Culpability judgements vs. Punishment judgements''': Brain imaging suggests culpability judgements activate the cool and cognitive dlPFC, but punishment judements activate more emotional vmPFC.  “A frothy limbic state”. Makes sense that punishment is costly.  But we need to overcome our attachment to punishment.  It is involved in a lot of unjustified suffering.  "Punishment that feels just feels good." (Recount Milan incident 2018.)
 
 
 
:*Recaps the transition we've made with epilepsy 610. Very nice point on 611 about the likely moral seriousness of 15th prosecutors of epilepsy.
 
 
 
:*Car free will.  A kind of reductio argument.  Car free will means "forces I don't understand yet."
 
 
 
====Postscript on reassessing praise====
 
 
 
:*(always the undertreated topic in this field).  Complimenting someone's cheekbones or their ability to detect ripe fruit.  Both are biologically dialed in, but we understand the latter less well.
 
 
 
===Henrich, Joseph, "Hell, Free Will, and Moral Universalism"===
 
 
 
:*This excerpt from ''The WEIRDEST People in the World'' comes in the context of a section on "universal moralizing gods" which characterize the major world religions (though Buddhism requires some discussion).  H's theory is that this cultural innovation in religions allows societies to grow, solving the problems associated with living with so many strangers, something our evolved psychology did not really prepare us for.
 
 
 
:*The three innovations of moralizing religions are:
 
::*contingent afterlife:
 
::*free will: encouraged follower to believe they could comply with moral code by acts of choice and will.
 
::*moral universalism:
 
 
 
:*The rest of the excerpt goes into evidence of the effects of each feature on social life.  The research related to free will is at top of p. 148.
 
 
 
:*What consequences, if any, does this research have for our thinking about the modern problems of free will and moral responsibility?
 
::*Maybe -- Cultural variants on ways of thinking about agency make real differences in social morality...
 
::*Maybe -- Free will has its origins in psychological adaptations that allow us to live in large societies.
 
::*Maybe -- The philosopher's concern with the metaphysical problem of free will is hard to reconcile with the cultural utility of a belief in free will.  (A foothold for "illusionism"?)
 
::*Maybe -- We have more reason now to separate what we tell our kids (You can do it if you try.  Don't let other people control your decisions.  What do you want to do with your life?) from what we know (?) about the ways that agency can be compromised or broken. The first way of talking seems justified even if the reality is that our failures are often the result of forces we have marginal control over. 
 
::*Does this research tell us that punishment (and one modelled on hell?) is atavistic or useful in shaping our thinking and policy?
 
 
 
:*Do these lines of thought strengthen or weaken (or leave unchanged) our commitment to moral responsibility as justifying retribution?
 

Latest revision as of 21:57, 27 January 2025

3. JAN 27

Assigned Work

  • Sonnenbergs, C 6, "A Gut Feeling"

In-class

  • Practicality: Comments on food budgets and variety
  • Satisfaction/Practicality/Nutrition: A 50cent egg lesson - $10/loaf bread.

The NSP Model for Dietary Change: What Should your Food Budget Be?

  • Some country comparisons: [1] and within the US: [2]. Generally, American's spend under 10% of disposable income on food vs. about 14-17% for Italians, French, etc. These are rough comparisons because of wealth effects and geographic effects. Norwegians are wealthier than Americans, Italians a bit less wealthy, but Mediterranean cultures have closer access to inexpensive fresh food.
  • At $20/hr, if you spend 14% of net monthly income on food, you would have about $400 to spend. You also use this figures to think about what a just or "living wage" would be. That $20 wage certainly cannot fund high rent prices and a healthy plant based diet.

The NSP Model for Dietary Change: Three 50cent egg lessons

  • A $10 loaf of bread?
  • Quality differences in pineapple.
  • Ultra-processed tomato sauce [3] v. canned, imported from Italy [4]

The NSP Model for Dietary Change: Comparing notes on variety expectations

  • Today we will start discussing how the NSP model helps us think about dietary change.
  • General “false practicality” point: How practical is the drive-through fast food option? How much time does it take? How does it makes you feel while eating, after eating? Do you notice blood sugar spikes from ff? How long until you feel hunger again?
  • Small group exercise. Today we’ll focus on some “Satisfaction-Practicality” connections relevant to designing / re-designing your diet. Specifically, consider these questions as you head into small group discussion to hear others’ approaches and thinking.
  • How much variety do you expect from breakfast, lunch, and dinner? Make a list.
  • How many different dinners would you need in your repertoire to feel like you had plenty of good choices? What is involved in "provisioning" those dinners?
  • Types of variety:
  • I want to come home knowing that I can choose from X different dinners depending on mood and conditions. (Home menu model)
  • I want my shopping to give me X dinners to choose from. It’s ok if variety decreases as the week goes by. (Variety Shopping model)
  • I’m ok scheduling each dinner by the days of the week. (Days of week meal planning.)
  • Other variety considerations:
  • I don’t want to repeat meals much within a week.
  • I’m fine eating the same thing for 2-3 nights or alternating 2 dinners over 4 days.
  • I look for variety seasonally.
  • I can eat the same breakfast for months, but then I need to change it.
  • Other sources of variety
  • Seasonal rotations -
  • Preparation variety - three pastas - tomato, primavera, ceci(!).
  • Make-shift dinners. (I can sometimes just make a salad and side veg for dinner.) Note the nutrition/practicality issues here. Easy to do and very practical if you are on top of your nutrition. You could add a protein shake.

The Enteric-Central Nervous System Axis

Microbiota-gut-Brain image2.jpg

Sonnenbergs, C 6, "A Gut Feeling"

  • The Brain-Gut Axis
  • Documents the two-way comm bt brain and gut (enteric nervous system). Gut brain is "listening" in on the trillions of microbes in the gut.
  • Central nervous system (sympathetic and parsympathetic). Autonomic functions like heart rate include "transit rate" of food, secretion of acid in stomach and mucus in intestines. Hypothalmoic-ituitary adrenal axis (HPA) controls hormones that affect digestion.
  • Gut bacteria can influence our perception of the world and behavior:
  • serotonin production
  • toxplasma gondii (rodents and cats)
  • microbe free mice are bigger risk takers. Critical phase in correcting for this.
  • mice with impaired microbiota had worse memory (141)
  • Speculate symbiotic relationship -- microbes likely improve fitness through risk aversion and memory.
  • Mechanisms -- gut bacteria produce chemicals that go into blood stream.
  • The Personality Transplant
  • More evidence of effects on perception and behavior:
  • 2011 McMaster study: fecal transplants between anxious and gregarious strains of mice partially reversed behavior. Mechanisms: Brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) - associated with depression, schizophrenia, and OCD. Gregarious mice has increase in BDNF after transplant. Intermediate mechanisms not completely clear. "How can a bacteria at the end of your digestive tract change the expression of a protein at the top of your skull?"
  • An unsupervised drug factory
  • 144: MACS (microbiotically available carbs) produce SCFAs, but also many other compounds, including toxins that normal kidneys filter. Lots to learn. Some stimulate appetite. Many products may be neutural with respect to fitness. They imagine a hypothetical scenario in which a pectin digesting bacterium takes up residence in your gut. Maybe it has mutated to also stimulate your desire for fruit.
  • The Microbiota's Toxic Waste
  • Hepatic encephalopathy -- treatments target microbes that produce toxins. Earlier treatments required removing some length of intestines.
  • TMAO - trimethylamine-N-oxide. produced by microbes. implicated in cardiovascular disease. Red meat and fatty foods increase TMAO. Vegans and vegetarians have low TMAO production. Study on long term vegan who eats a steak. Still low TMAO. Might be lacking those microbes. (might argue for low meat consumption as nearly healthful as total meat abstinence).
  • Two-way communication between "brains"
  • Stress, IBS, Autism, and angry faces
  • Induce stress in mice and their microbiota change. Threats cause symp n.s. to do lots of things, including slowing motility and digestion. (maybe to prep us for action)
  • Some stress events have long term effect on microbiota. 150
  • IBS - read - could be a stress induced imbalance that is hard to correct because it gives you MB that also induce stress. also heightened pain perception. Read at 151.
  • Some evidence in animal models that probiotics can help with psychological problems (psychobiotics). Some studies in humans suggest this as well. Better studies needed.
  • Chemical spills out of the gut
  • ASD - autism spectrum disorders. Increasing dramatically. Often associated with gut symptoms. [5] Note connection to rise of industrial diets!
  • ASD research: 2013 Caltech studies by Mazmanian - looked at maternal immune response to infection during pregnancy. Treatment with b. fragilis helped somewhat in mice, both with leaky gut and behavioral symptoms. Effect might involve other microbes. B. fragilis affected over 100 other compounds in blood. Human/mice diffs are significant here. Caution.
  • Fermented Foods
  • 2013 UCLA fMRI study on probiotic yogurt and response to negative facial emotions.