Difference between revisions of "FEB 1"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==4: FEB 1== ===Assigned=== :*Nadelhoffer, Thomas. "Introduction - Moral Responsibility has a Past - Has it a future?" (16) :*Waller. Bruce. "Moral Responsibility is Morall...")
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==4: FEB 1==
+
==6: FEB 1. ==
  
 
===Assigned===
 
===Assigned===
  
:*Nadelhoffer, Thomas. "Introduction - Moral Responsibility has a Past - Has it a future?" (16)
+
:*Wrangham C10 – “The Evolution of Right and Wrong” – 2nd half (210-220; 10) – Key concepts: Good Samaritan Problem, emotions as moral guides, interference, baby prosociality, Ultimatum Game, reverse dominance hierarchies, self-protection, conformity, obedience, shame, guilt, and embarrassment.
  
:*Waller. Bruce. "Moral Responsibility is Morally Wrong"  (15)
+
===In-Class===
  
:*Rubric Training
+
:*Rubric and Process
 +
:*Bonobos (Wrangham C5)
 +
:*The Tyrant Problem and Capital Punishment (C7 & C8)
  
===Rubric Training===
+
===Rubric and Process===
  
:*We will look at some writing by my Fall 2020 Ethics students. In this case, they were writing about a different chapter of Sapolsky, in which he lays out how evolution explains evolved behaviors. Here's the prompt for this 600 word writing exercise:
+
:*[[Assignment Rubric]] - Normalizing scores. What's a 5 out of 7? How likely are we to see 3, 2, or 1?
:*"Topic: In "The Evolution of Social Behavior," Robert Sapolsky reviews the resources in evolutionary theory for explaining social behaviors like cooperation and group behavior. In a 600 word essay, answer this question: "Drawing on resources from this chapter, how does an evolutionist explain how cooperation and other moral behaviors start and are sustained in a human community?" Give examples of processes which promote or impede moral behaviors. Be sure to consider how humans both fit and do not fit evolutionary patterns which apply to other animals. How does Sapolsky explain this?"
 
  
:*Browse the [[Assignment Rubric]] - Note the importance of sensitivity to the prompt.
+
:*Today we will do some rubric training (sometimes called "grade norming").
:*Explain the structure of a peer assessed assignment.  Note your SW1 coming soon on Waller.  Review that. Writing (possible 21 points), peer review and assessment, my evaluation, back evaluation of your evaluator (additional 10 points). 
 
:*Look at some peer reviews and scoring of Whale (10), Egret (12), Macaw (15).  Then the writing.
 
  
:*Take 4 minutes to "audit" one to two pieces from this assignment.  Note helpful and unhelpful peer comments. See if you agree with the assessments.
+
:*Process for writing review, scoring, and comments. (Use SW1 assignment.)
  
===Nadelhoffer, Thomas. "Introduction - Moral Responsibility has a Past - Has it a future?"===
+
===Wrangham C10 – “The Evolution of Right and Wrong” – 2nd half (210-220; 10)===
  
:*Example of 9/11 crimes -- arguably launched retribution on big scale. War in Afghanistan and Iraq, Guantanamo.  Man hunt and execution of bin Laden. 
+
:*See notes from previous class.
  
:*global skepticism about MR -- "no one is responsible" vs. local.  External vs. internal (revisionism).
+
===The Tyrant Problem and Capital Punishment (C7 & C8)===
:*sources: theoretical argument vs. empirical evidence. 
 
  
:*Summary of Waller reading1. Problems with "hitting back".  2. Connected to BJW. 3. Faith in self-making powers. Cross cultural analysis to show superiority of non-retributive system.
+
:*The Tyrant problem and Capital Punishment- Evidence of use of capital punishment in human societiesExecution was a selective pressure against aggressive individuals (mostly males). Or, "We evolved a behavior of using coalitionary proactive aggression against bullies."
  
:*Summary of Nagel's Luck argument.  Luck pincer.  bt. constitutive and present luck, no MR.  Caruso and the quarantine/public health model.   
+
:*Execution hypothesis - Selection against aggressiveness and in favor of greater docility came from execution of the most anti-social individuals.   
  
:*Summary of LemosWhile an event causal libertarian, Lemos argues that given the bad alternatives of abandoning MR, and the lack of certainty about free will, we should act as it we have itThis requires replying to the "hard heartedness" of punishment with desert.   
+
:*Has Darwin’s support, even though he didn’t think we self-domAppreciated that contemporary society’s execution practice was a kind of selection pressure. (Prison does nothing for your dating prospects.) More dominant theory has been: parochial altruism hypothesis — groups that could cooperate in war have an advantage. Specifically self-sacrificeBut this is not seen in hunter-gather groups. Maybe more of a cultural level effect.   
  
:*Summary of ShawLegal reform argumentsSocial protection approaches.   
+
:*Alexander argues that reputation is the key to h.sapien cooperationGossip matters.  Chimps don’t gossip and don’t care about their reputationEvidence from h-gatherers.  Reputation matters. 137.   
  
:*Summary of Coates: Background to Coates: "Manipulation arguments" for incompatibalism try to show that determinism compromises MR as much as manipulation.  Original arguments from Mele and Perboom (p. 25).  Soft compatibalists accept that manipulation compromises MR, but not that determinism does.  Coates uses possible world semantics to make the distinction.  The idea is that in a near possible world that is indeterministic, the agent would have the same desires and goals, and his behavior would be likee the determined self on this world.   
+
:*Solution to the Tyrant problem (an alpha male who doesn’t care about his reputation) is for coalitions of males to kill him.   
  
:*Summary of Vargas: Instrumentalist - Revisionist. How does MR system benefit us ind/socially?  Argues that MR-system is part of how we navigate social space and become a full member of a moral community.  Revisionist side argues that we can jettison problematic folk psych theories or metaphysical underpinnings of MR and focus on justifying practices.
+
:*C8 - Capital punishment
  
===Waller. Bruce. "Moral Responsibility is Morally Wrong"===
+
:*Used to be lots of ways to get executed. Read at 143. Popular.  Crimes to execution in a few days.  Not just America.  Capital punishment is a human universal.  By contrast, other primates allow for contests against the alpha male.
  
:*MR: atavistic holdover, obsolete, fules retribution, populist punitivism, undermines right, promotes shaming, distorts FW, blocks understanding of behavior, comforts privileged, afflicts the poor.
+
:*Examples of male coalitions in h-gather groups. Importance of self-deprecation to show you are not arrogant.  Egalitarian expectation.  Predates ag societies hierarchy. 
  
:*Example of libertarian theorist who ack. limits of theory, but advocates pretending. Waller considers this damning evidence, but we will read a more sympathetic accounting of this position.
+
:*Why aren’t there alpha males around h-gatherers.  Story 157 of gift of ox that backfires. (Like anti-social punishment).   Dom from cap pun supported by absence of alpha males and egalitarian values among males.
  
:*Peter Van Inwagen considers MR denial "absurd" - character in philosophy, ND.  Quote from SEP, "MR Skepticism, p. 39": "I have listened to philosophers who deny the existence of moral responsibility. I cannot take them seriously. I know a philosopher who has written a paper in which he denies the reality of moral responsibility. And yet this same philosopher, when certain of his books were stolen, said, “That was a shoddy thing to do!” But no one can consistently say that a certain act was a shoddy thing to do and say that its agent was not morally responsible when he performed it. (1983: 207) "An Essay on Free Will" (With all due respect to this famous philosopher, what's wrong with this answer?)
+
:*161: genetic account — Would 300,000 years (12,000 generations) be enough?    Some indicators, yes. But needs language. Language comes in bt 100,000 and 60,000 y ago.  Good evidence h.sapien langauge better than other homo.   
  
:*MRS (MR system): assumed, need excuses to leave it, "strike back desire"  suggests with the "Larry, Mo and Curly" comment that MRS promoted hierarchy and dominance.   
+
:*”The development of increasingly skilled language, in combination with our evolved solution to the tyrant problem, thus provides the best basis for the ultimate explanation of human domestication. Or, "Unlike chimps, but like bonobos, h. sapiens did not tolerate alpha males ruling by 1-1 contests for dominance.  Humans and bonobos gang up on tyrants."
  
:*Central Park 5 case as example.
+
===Small Group Discussion: "The Paradox" and "More Bonobo"?===
  
:*3 features: desire to pass along pain, belief in just world (BJW), belief in self-making.
+
:*In your small group discussion consider two questions:  
 +
::*1. What is the "paradox of goodness" in Wrangham's theory of the the origins of morality? 
 +
::*2. Would we be better off if we were less chimp and more bonobo?  (Your group might also speculate about how that could come about. Should we raise our expectations for tolerance and non-aggression?  Lower our groupishness?)
  
:*BJW related to "secondary victimization" (35). ex. blaming rape victims.  But History of Philosophy (and C. Church) line up for BJW.  But even Dennett, who denies BSW, defends the ultimate "fairness" of differences in capacity.  "luck averages out in the long run" (Really? [https://www.amazon.com/Son-Also-Rises-Surnames-Princeton-ebook/dp/B00HNF5Z96/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3IIJJH0N2ZE8V&dchild=1&keywords=the+son+also+rises+gregory+clark&qid=1612199204&sprefix=the+son+also+ri%2Caps%2C232&sr=8-1 The Son Also Rises].  Feeds ideology of "try harder"
+
:*Fill in this group [https://forms.gle/DttvYZ1pD9xgGns97 report form] with your best answer to each questionsYou each receive 5 points for completing the form.
 
 
:*p. 37- begins historical discussion of problem of evil and problem of free will.  Renaissance - Lorenzo Valla, St. Paul, but then Pico della Mirandola - quote on our Protean nature.  Special powers of self-making. 
 
 
 
:*"people make their choices from characters that are self-made" Note the "humunculus" problem here.  "Who is doing the making?"  We must read the Nietzsche quote.
 
 
 
:*Dennett's version: "I have created and unleashed an agent who is myself".  (note the sense in which that is intuitively true.  "OMG, what have I done!"  (Note concession at p. 39)
 
 
 
:*"folk metaphysics account of agency" -- transparency of csness, everyone has delib. reason.  Cites standard view in psychology: System 1 and System 2.
 
 
 
:*"The skill and fortitude and optimism and confidence with which you "play the cards that were dealt you" are ultimately among the care that were dealt you."
 
 
 
:*Example of the "chronic cognizer" (Cassandra) and "cognitive miser" (Laura) --
 
 
 
:*Effects in CJ system: Foreshadows Caradino reading.
 

Latest revision as of 20:41, 1 February 2024

6: FEB 1.

Assigned

  • Wrangham C10 – “The Evolution of Right and Wrong” – 2nd half (210-220; 10) – Key concepts: Good Samaritan Problem, emotions as moral guides, interference, baby prosociality, Ultimatum Game, reverse dominance hierarchies, self-protection, conformity, obedience, shame, guilt, and embarrassment.

In-Class

  • Rubric and Process
  • Bonobos (Wrangham C5)
  • The Tyrant Problem and Capital Punishment (C7 & C8)

Rubric and Process

  • Assignment Rubric - Normalizing scores. What's a 5 out of 7? How likely are we to see 3, 2, or 1?
  • Today we will do some rubric training (sometimes called "grade norming").
  • Process for writing review, scoring, and comments. (Use SW1 assignment.)

Wrangham C10 – “The Evolution of Right and Wrong” – 2nd half (210-220; 10)

  • See notes from previous class.

The Tyrant Problem and Capital Punishment (C7 & C8)

  • The Tyrant problem and Capital Punishment- Evidence of use of capital punishment in human societies. Execution was a selective pressure against aggressive individuals (mostly males). Or, "We evolved a behavior of using coalitionary proactive aggression against bullies."
  • Execution hypothesis - Selection against aggressiveness and in favor of greater docility came from execution of the most anti-social individuals.
  • Has Darwin’s support, even though he didn’t think we self-dom. Appreciated that contemporary society’s execution practice was a kind of selection pressure. (Prison does nothing for your dating prospects.) More dominant theory has been: parochial altruism hypothesis — groups that could cooperate in war have an advantage. Specifically self-sacrifice. But this is not seen in hunter-gather groups. Maybe more of a cultural level effect.
  • Alexander argues that reputation is the key to h.sapien cooperation. Gossip matters. Chimps don’t gossip and don’t care about their reputation. Evidence from h-gatherers. Reputation matters. 137.
  • Solution to the Tyrant problem (an alpha male who doesn’t care about his reputation) is for coalitions of males to kill him.
  • C8 - Capital punishment
  • Used to be lots of ways to get executed. Read at 143. Popular. Crimes to execution in a few days. Not just America. Capital punishment is a human universal. By contrast, other primates allow for contests against the alpha male.
  • Examples of male coalitions in h-gather groups. Importance of self-deprecation to show you are not arrogant. Egalitarian expectation. Predates ag societies hierarchy.
  • Why aren’t there alpha males around h-gatherers. Story 157 of gift of ox that backfires. (Like anti-social punishment). Dom from cap pun supported by absence of alpha males and egalitarian values among males.
  • 161: genetic account — Would 300,000 years (12,000 generations) be enough? Some indicators, yes. But needs language. Language comes in bt 100,000 and 60,000 y ago. Good evidence h.sapien langauge better than other homo.
  • ”The development of increasingly skilled language, in combination with our evolved solution to the tyrant problem, thus provides the best basis for the ultimate explanation of human domestication. Or, "Unlike chimps, but like bonobos, h. sapiens did not tolerate alpha males ruling by 1-1 contests for dominance. Humans and bonobos gang up on tyrants."

Small Group Discussion: "The Paradox" and "More Bonobo"?

  • In your small group discussion consider two questions:
  • 1. What is the "paradox of goodness" in Wrangham's theory of the the origins of morality?
  • 2. Would we be better off if we were less chimp and more bonobo? (Your group might also speculate about how that could come about. Should we raise our expectations for tolerance and non-aggression? Lower our groupishness?)
  • Fill in this group report form with your best answer to each questions. You each receive 5 points for completing the form.