Difference between revisions of "APR 9"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==23: APR 9. == ===Assigned=== :*Henrich C6 – “Psychological Differences, Families, and the Church” – (193-230; 37) – psychology of kin based institutions, imperso...")
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==23: APR 9. ==
+
==21. APR 9==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*Henrich C6 – “Psychological Differences, Families, and the Church” – (193-230; 37) – psychology of kin based institutions, impersonal prosociality, out-group trust, public goods game research, impersonal punishment and revenge.
+
:*Genoways, The Chain, C7, “From Seed to Slaughter” 97-112 (15)
 +
:*Van Tulleken, Chris, C16, "UPF destroys traditional diets" (236-249; 13)
  
 
===In-Class===
 
===In-Class===
  
:*Recap of problem of decline of religious culture. 
+
:*Documentary Reports
::*Benefits and problems of religious culture.
 
::*Evolutionary challenges to cooperation: mass shootings, homelessness, climate & environment
 
::*Evolution of religions toward universalism
 
::*Evolution of secular humanistic attitudes
 
::*The challenge of globalism.  - loss of sovereignty Behind all of this — the power of individual and kin selection.
 
  
:*Church’s Marriage and Family Plan - chart from C14
+
===Van Tulleken, Chris, C16, "UPF destroys traditional diets"===
  
:*Comment on the "weirdness" of culture as a determinant of our thinking.
+
:*'''Nestle in Brazil''' - door to door sales and samplesFloating supermarketMarketing UPF to people in traditional diets, changing their food growing practices to commodities for UPFThe floating supermarket undersells the local market prices.  
::*The idea of culture as a determinant of our thinking.
 
::*We have pretty good evidence that many aspects of our thinking are influenced by cultureRecall the paradox of moral experienceWhen we study culture objectively, like Henrich et al do, it is apparent that culture “causally determines” psychology, beliefs, and attitudesBut when we ask our selves about our subjective beliefs, we think of them as our own.  This is paradoxical.  Which is it?
 
::*Creates the possibility of “critical distance” from our culture (Also happens when we travel.).  
 
  
===Henrich C6 – “Psychological Differences, Families, and the Church===
+
:*Soybean exports - see also, Soyalism.  Most soy is for animal food or UPF processes. 
  
:*Establishing the connection between “strength of kinship / prevalence of cousin marriage” and leading psychological features of WEIRD cultureKII used to rank countries, then correlation of measures of KII/cousin marriage with various WEIRD psych features.
+
:*really a story about the supply chain competition for market share for UPFDisruption of traditional food cultures is not a consideration.
  
:*WEIRD Psychology:
+
:*connection with Type 2 diabetes, childhood obesity, and other dietary diseases. 
::*Tightness of norms and norm enforcement
 
::*Conformity
 
::*Individualism
 
::*Out-In-Group Trust
 
::*Universalism/Loyalty - measured by Passenger’s Dilemma (note Haidt’s MFQ data here)
 
::*Prosociality - measured by PGG, blood donations
 
::*Impersonal honesty - measured by Impersonal Honesty Game, diplomat’s parking tickets
 
::*Impersonal Punishment and revenge - PGG with punishment (217) note diff effects
 
::*Intentions
 
::*Analytic Thinking
 
  
:*Why think the Catholic Church has anything to do with this?
+
:*'''KFC Hot Wings''' story - the Colonel.  More about the ethics of cultural appropriation.  KFC as UPF. Tone deaf marketing.  Food history of fried chicken in context of slavery.  “KFC is a company based on Black ingenuity, and yet it does not allude to or celebrate blackness.
::*Timeline of Church’s MFP in C5 -
 
::*”Duration of exposure model” for Church’s influence (224-230) Exposure to Church explains 40-60% of variation in KII.
 
  
===Critical Assessment of WEIRD culture===
+
:*dimethylpolysiloxane - !
:*What does WEIRD culture allow us to do that we might agree is good?
 
::# Live in cities with lots of strangers.
 
::# More willing to invest in public goods.
 
::# Increased support for universal rules that apply to everyone
 
::# Be less conformist
 
::# Internalize standards - guilt over shame
 
::# Live autonomously - less dependent on kinship obligations
 
::# Engage in market behavior due to impersonal trust, imp prosociality, imp honesty
 
  
:*How might WEIRD culture limit us or lead to negative (maladaptive) consequences?
+
:*marketing can be inclusive and predatory at the same time.   
::# Decreases the power of religion (mixed - less authoritarian norm enforcement but less norm enforcement)
 
::# Decreases loyalty to family (at least as measured by passenger’s dilemma)Family member’s suffering less likely to be addressed by kin. (Mixed since kin-based society have more corruption, unjust partiality.)
 
::# Decreases “tightness” of norm enforcement. (“No shame.”) (Mixed - good to end shaming, but norm enforcement is still important)
 
::# Increases personal isolation (WEIRD cultures are lonelier.)
 
::# Normalizing self-interest may normalize lack of concern for others.
 
  
:*Possible general criticisms of WEIRD culture and its other.
+
:*focus on KFC in Ghana. High social status as western food, but causing dietary disease.
::# Atomism: We are less bonded with kin, but not really bonded to each other.
 
::# Both kin-based and WEIRD cultures are having trouble meeting challenges that transcend groups and borders, like climate change, global environmental degradation, absolute poverty.
 
  
:*What can we do about this?  We do get a “vote” in evolution. Once we have a cultural evolution explanation for a dysfunctional cultural problem, we are in a good position to make a cultural argument for change(Go back to the Paradox to see why) Examples:
+
:*How would you respond to someone who said this is what people want?
::*Mass shootings.   
+
 
::*Lack of solutions for homelessness
+
===Genoways, The Chain, C7, “From Seed to Slaughter”===
::*High incarceration rates and recidivism rates for criminal conduct.
+
 
::*High rates of suicide and death from addiction.
+
:*Hog farming in the US.  674 farms, average of 26 pigs per farm, but contract farms are much larger.  [https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2014/januaryfebruary/production-contracts-may-help-small-hog-farms-grow-in-size/]
 +
 
 +
:*Story of LB pork. Lynn Becker, multi-generational pig farmer, hoping to boost from 50,000 to 100,000 pigs per year.  This is big.
 +
 
 +
:*get a call from PETA about a breeding operation he had recently bought: 6,000 sows, 10s of 1,000 of piglets.  MowMar farms.  “Farrow to wean operation.”
 +
 
 +
:*secret video.  P. 99.  Becker genuinely upset, but also worried about a contract cancellation from Hormel.  1 million loan at stake.  '''Just like the chicken farmers under contract to firms like Purdue.'''
 +
 
 +
:*Historical background on the industrialization of hog farms in the US:
 +
::*We protected small farms from corporate vertical monopolies, but some of the small farms adopted the same strategy.  Also, corporate producers found ways around the laws. Note historical reference to the Meat Trust, which we read about from Ogle. 
 +
 
 +
::*North Carolina example of industrial growth.  Containment breeches in 1999.  Corporations sue for restraint of trade and make deals with states.  Many small farms sold out, others took contracts.  Perverse effects from the agreements: motivated fast investment in light of the expiration dates of the agreement. 
 +
 
 +
::*2002 Hormel gets permission to increase kill floor line speed9,000 to 10,500 /day.  Note the standardization process.  Single breeds with predictable fat ratios. Walmart demands identical pork shops, so you need identical pigs.  Read list of chemicals and measure farmers take to earn the “red box” premium (107)
 +
 
 +
::*How do you process 7.7 million hogs a year!  With supply chain precision: 175 trailers x 170 hog x 260 days. 
 +
 
 +
:*Back to Lynn Becker
 +
 
 +
::*meet the Harvard MBA, Weihs who figures out the profitability of a “farrow to wean” operationNPPII in North Carolina. Pigs “treated like royalty”.  “We are a factory.  You wouldn’t want your car not to be made in a factory”.
 +
::*But then you learn that the model he developed was very vulnerable to price fluctuations. He sells his interest and moves on!  (Might remind you of Philip Armour.)
 +
::*rumors of bankruptcy at NPPII, decline in “husbandry”, worker terminated and blows the whistle.  Parallel to the story at LB Pork operation.
 +
::*'''Mistreatment of animals as an effect of industrial scale and volatility.'''

Latest revision as of 20:59, 9 April 2025

21. APR 9

Assigned Work

  • Genoways, The Chain, C7, “From Seed to Slaughter” 97-112 (15)
  • Van Tulleken, Chris, C16, "UPF destroys traditional diets" (236-249; 13)

In-Class

  • Documentary Reports

Van Tulleken, Chris, C16, "UPF destroys traditional diets"

  • Nestle in Brazil - door to door sales and samples. Floating supermarket. Marketing UPF to people in traditional diets, changing their food growing practices to commodities for UPF. The floating supermarket undersells the local market prices.
  • Soybean exports - see also, Soyalism. Most soy is for animal food or UPF processes.
  • really a story about the supply chain competition for market share for UPF. Disruption of traditional food cultures is not a consideration.
  • connection with Type 2 diabetes, childhood obesity, and other dietary diseases.
  • KFC Hot Wings story - the Colonel. More about the ethics of cultural appropriation. KFC as UPF. Tone deaf marketing. Food history of fried chicken in context of slavery. “KFC is a company based on Black ingenuity, and yet it does not allude to or celebrate blackness.”
  • dimethylpolysiloxane - !
  • marketing can be inclusive and predatory at the same time.
  • focus on KFC in Ghana. High social status as western food, but causing dietary disease.
  • How would you respond to someone who said this is what people want?

Genoways, The Chain, C7, “From Seed to Slaughter”

  • Hog farming in the US. 674 farms, average of 26 pigs per farm, but contract farms are much larger. [1]
  • Story of LB pork. Lynn Becker, multi-generational pig farmer, hoping to boost from 50,000 to 100,000 pigs per year. This is big.
  • get a call from PETA about a breeding operation he had recently bought: 6,000 sows, 10s of 1,000 of piglets. MowMar farms. “Farrow to wean operation.”
  • secret video. P. 99. Becker genuinely upset, but also worried about a contract cancellation from Hormel. 1 million loan at stake. Just like the chicken farmers under contract to firms like Purdue.
  • Historical background on the industrialization of hog farms in the US:
  • We protected small farms from corporate vertical monopolies, but some of the small farms adopted the same strategy. Also, corporate producers found ways around the laws. Note historical reference to the Meat Trust, which we read about from Ogle.
  • North Carolina example of industrial growth. Containment breeches in 1999. Corporations sue for restraint of trade and make deals with states. Many small farms sold out, others took contracts. Perverse effects from the agreements: motivated fast investment in light of the expiration dates of the agreement.
  • 2002 Hormel gets permission to increase kill floor line speed. 9,000 to 10,500 /day. Note the standardization process. Single breeds with predictable fat ratios. Walmart demands identical pork shops, so you need identical pigs. Read list of chemicals and measure farmers take to earn the “red box” premium (107).
  • How do you process 7.7 million hogs a year! With supply chain precision: 175 trailers x 170 hog x 260 days.
  • Back to Lynn Becker
  • meet the Harvard MBA, Weihs who figures out the profitability of a “farrow to wean” operation. NPPII in North Carolina. Pigs “treated like royalty”. “We are a factory. You wouldn’t want your car not to be made in a factory”.
  • But then you learn that the model he developed was very vulnerable to price fluctuations. He sells his interest and moves on! (Might remind you of Philip Armour.)
  • rumors of bankruptcy at NPPII, decline in “husbandry”, worker terminated and blows the whistle. Parallel to the story at LB Pork operation.
  • Mistreatment of animals as an effect of industrial scale and volatility.