Difference between revisions of "Spring 2014 Ethics Course Study Questions"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (→JAN 23) |
(→JAN 23) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
# Describe Haidt's research on disgust. What is its possible significance for understanding the nature of ethics. | # Describe Haidt's research on disgust. What is its possible significance for understanding the nature of ethics. | ||
# What is Haidt's criticism of developmental psychology's past approach to understanding the nature of ethics? | # What is Haidt's criticism of developmental psychology's past approach to understanding the nature of ethics? | ||
| − | # | + | # Why does Haidt think that Turiel's and Schweder's research represent an improvement over the nature/nuture debate? |
==JAN 28== | ==JAN 28== | ||
Revision as of 19:09, 22 January 2014
Return to Ethics
JAN 14
1st class
JAN 16
- What were Ariely's findings on honesty?
- What is the possible significance of his research for understanding the nature of ethics?
JAN 21
- How do we use metaphors to think about the psyche, soul, and human identity?
- What organic features of consciousness does Haidt think we need to consider when doing ethics? How might they be usefull?
- What picture of the mind does Haidt leave us with?
- What is the the significance of defining ethics in terms of settling value conflict?
- What, if anything, does the Zimbardo Experiment tell us about the nature of ethics?
JAN 23
- Describe Haidt's research on disgust. What is its possible significance for understanding the nature of ethics.
- What is Haidt's criticism of developmental psychology's past approach to understanding the nature of ethics?
- Why does Haidt think that Turiel's and Schweder's research represent an improvement over the nature/nuture debate?
