Difference between revisions of "Summer2 2014 Benin Ethics Course Reading Notes"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "==Thursday June 5, 2014== :*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403) ==Monday June 9, 2014== ==Tuesday June 10, 2014== ==Wednesday June 11, 2014== :*LC...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403) | :*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Ariely, Why We Lie=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Research on honesty with the "matrix task" | ||
+ | ::*Shredder condition | ||
+ | ::*Payment condition | ||
+ | ::*Probability of getting caught condition | ||
+ | ::*Distance of payment condition | ||
+ | ::*Presence of a cheater condition - contagiousness | ||
+ | ::* balancing - what the hell | ||
+ | :*Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form vs chances of being caught | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Implications | ||
+ | :*small-scale vs high-profile cheating | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Tips on How to report study findings=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*observational, survey, experimental | ||
+ | :*study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given? | ||
+ | :*what conditions were tested? | ||
+ | :*what was the immediate result? | ||
+ | :*what was the significance or inference to be made from the results? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==Monday June 9, 2014== | ==Monday June 9, 2014== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas. | ||
+ | :*Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken. | ||
+ | :*Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists (nature), empiricists (nurture), rationalists (morality is cognitive, reasoning process) | ||
+ | ::*Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences. "self-constructed" - alt to nature/nurture. | ||
+ | ::*Kohlberg's "Heinz story" - note problems, p. 9. | ||
+ | ::*Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions" | ||
+ | :*Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches). If Turiel was right about harm, why do so many non-western cultures moralize things like purity? Found answers in Schweder's work. | ||
+ | :*Schweder: sociocentric vs. individualistic cultures. Interview subjects in sociocentric societies don't make the conventional/non-conventional distinction. | ||
+ | :*Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable. | ||
==Tuesday June 10, 2014== | ==Tuesday June 10, 2014== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*opening story | ||
+ | :*Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors. metaphors. | ||
+ | :*Mind vs. Body | ||
+ | :*Left vs. Right | ||
+ | :*New vs. Old | ||
+ | :*Controlled vs. Automatic | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Failures of Self-control [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQzM8jRpoh4]] | ||
+ | :*Haidt's "disgust" studies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially instantiated. | ||
Line 12: | Line 62: | ||
:*LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin Politics | :*LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin Politics | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===First Group Responses: Benin Learning Community readings and Ethics Readings=== | ||
==Thursday June 12, 2014== | ==Thursday June 12, 2014== | ||
Line 19: | Line 71: | ||
:*LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass: View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week. | :*LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass: View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Philosophy's "rationalist delusion" | ||
+ | :*30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson - three models of the mind | ||
+ | :*A brief history of moral philosophy: | ||
+ | ::*Stage 1: moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to). Wilson's prophecy. | ||
+ | ::*Stage 2: Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio (note studies of patients with dysfunction vmPFC) | ||
+ | ::*Stage 3: Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology. | ||
+ | ::*studying controlled vs. automatic process by testing under "cognitive load" -- some moral decision making not impaired by load | ||
+ | ::*Studies of "moral dumbfounding: | ||
+ | :::*Roach-juice | ||
+ | :::*Soul selling | ||
+ | :::*Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking. | ||
+ | :*Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology | ||
+ | ::*Wasson card selection test: Margolis' "seeing that" vs. "seeing why" -- note that morality involves the latter as well. | ||
+ | :*Rider and Elephant | ||
+ | ::*Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling" | ||
+ | ::*45: Elephant and Rider defined | ||
+ | :*Social Intuitionist Model | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer | ||
+ | :*Priming studies: | ||
+ | ::*"take" "often" -- works with neutral stories also | ||
+ | :*Research supporting "intuitions come first" | ||
+ | :*1. Brains evaluate instantly and constantly | ||
+ | ::*Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language | ||
+ | :*2. Social and Political judgements intuitive | ||
+ | ::*flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine" (affective priming) | ||
+ | ::*Implicit Association Test | ||
+ | ::*flashing word pairs with political terms causes dissonance. | ||
+ | ::*Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap ju-- note: Dissonance is pain.' | ||
+ | ::*judgements of competence. note speed of judgement (59) | ||
+ | :*3. Bodies guide judgements | ||
+ | ::*Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!) | ||
+ | ::*Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements. "Macbeth effect" (connection between body and morality) | ||
+ | ::*Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism. | ||
+ | :*4. Psychopaths: reason but don't feel | ||
+ | ::*Robert Hare, researcher on psychpaths: testimony. | ||
+ | :*5. Babies: feel but don't reason | ||
+ | ::*Theory behind startle response studies in infants | ||
+ | ::*Bloom's moral puppet shows: helper and hinderer puppet shows | ||
+ | ::*Social interaction appraisal at six months: reaching for helper puppets | ||
+ | :*6. Affective reactions in the brain | ||
+ | ::*Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems -- [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WB3Q5EF4Sg The Trolley Problem] | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*When does the elephant listen to reason? | ||
+ | ::*Friends... The Importance of Friends -- back to social intuitionism | ||
+ | ::*Are we determined to follow the elephant (our own or our friends')? The importance of delay | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Method: Giving Philosophical Arguments in Ethics=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Distinguish: | ||
+ | ::*Research results | ||
+ | ::*Significance of results | ||
+ | ::*Justification of theories | ||
+ | :::*What are the reasons for thinking that the nature of morality is disclosed by psychological studcies? | ||
+ | :::*Descriptive (scientific or observational) vs. Justificatory (ought we, can we act otherwise than the way nature disposes us to act?) claims | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 3 June 2014
Contents
- 1 Thursday June 5, 2014
- 2 Monday June 9, 2014
- 3 Tuesday June 10, 2014
- 4 Wednesday June 11, 2014
- 5 Thursday June 12, 2014
- 6 Monday June 16, 2014
- 7 Tuesday June 17, 2014
- 8 Wendnesday June 18, 2014
- 9 Thursday June 19, 2014
- 10 Monday July 7, 2014
- 11 Tuesday, July 8, 2014
- 12 Wednesday, July 9, 2014
- 13 Thursday, July 10, 2014
- 14 Monday July 14, 2014
- 15 Tuesday, July 15, 2014
- 16 Wednesday, July 16, 2014
- 17 Thursday, July 17, 2014
Thursday June 5, 2014
- LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403)
Ariely, Why We Lie
- Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
- Shredder condition
- Payment condition
- Probability of getting caught condition
- Distance of payment condition
- Presence of a cheater condition - contagiousness
- balancing - what the hell
- Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form vs chances of being caught
- Implications
- small-scale vs high-profile cheating
Tips on How to report study findings
- observational, survey, experimental
- study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given?
- what conditions were tested?
- what was the immediate result?
- what was the significance or inference to be made from the results?
Monday June 9, 2014
Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1
- Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.
- Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
- Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists (nature), empiricists (nurture), rationalists (morality is cognitive, reasoning process)
- Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences. "self-constructed" - alt to nature/nurture.
- Kohlberg's "Heinz story" - note problems, p. 9.
- Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"
- Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches). If Turiel was right about harm, why do so many non-western cultures moralize things like purity? Found answers in Schweder's work.
- Schweder: sociocentric vs. individualistic cultures. Interview subjects in sociocentric societies don't make the conventional/non-conventional distinction.
- Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.
Tuesday June 10, 2014
Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"
- opening story
- Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors. metaphors.
- Mind vs. Body
- Left vs. Right
- New vs. Old
- Controlled vs. Automatic
- Failures of Self-control [[1]]
- Haidt's "disgust" studies.
- Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially instantiated.
Wednesday June 11, 2014
- LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin Politics
First Group Responses: Benin Learning Community readings and Ethics Readings
Thursday June 12, 2014
Monday June 16, 2014
- LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass: View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week.
Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"
- Philosophy's "rationalist delusion"
- 30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson - three models of the mind
- A brief history of moral philosophy:
- Stage 1: moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to). Wilson's prophecy.
- Stage 2: Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio (note studies of patients with dysfunction vmPFC)
- Stage 3: Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology.
- studying controlled vs. automatic process by testing under "cognitive load" -- some moral decision making not impaired by load
- Studies of "moral dumbfounding:
- Roach-juice
- Soul selling
- Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking.
- Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology
- Wasson card selection test: Margolis' "seeing that" vs. "seeing why" -- note that morality involves the latter as well.
- Rider and Elephant
- Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling"
- 45: Elephant and Rider defined
- Social Intuitionist Model
Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"
- Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer
- Priming studies:
- "take" "often" -- works with neutral stories also
- Research supporting "intuitions come first"
- 1. Brains evaluate instantly and constantly
- Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language
- 2. Social and Political judgements intuitive
- flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine" (affective priming)
- Implicit Association Test
- flashing word pairs with political terms causes dissonance.
- Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap ju-- note: Dissonance is pain.'
- judgements of competence. note speed of judgement (59)
- 3. Bodies guide judgements
- Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!)
- Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements. "Macbeth effect" (connection between body and morality)
- Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism.
- 4. Psychopaths: reason but don't feel
- Robert Hare, researcher on psychpaths: testimony.
- 5. Babies: feel but don't reason
- Theory behind startle response studies in infants
- Bloom's moral puppet shows: helper and hinderer puppet shows
- Social interaction appraisal at six months: reaching for helper puppets
- 6. Affective reactions in the brain
- Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems -- The Trolley Problem
- When does the elephant listen to reason?
- Friends... The Importance of Friends -- back to social intuitionism
- Are we determined to follow the elephant (our own or our friends')? The importance of delay
Method: Giving Philosophical Arguments in Ethics
- Distinguish:
- Research results
- Significance of results
- Justification of theories
- What are the reasons for thinking that the nature of morality is disclosed by psychological studcies?
- Descriptive (scientific or observational) vs. Justificatory (ought we, can we act otherwise than the way nature disposes us to act?) claims
Tuesday June 17, 2014
Wendnesday June 18, 2014
- LC Packet: Millenium Development Goals for Benin and Easterly reading. Browse links on Learning Community site and look up other health and development data, and save notes for in country discussion.