Difference between revisions of "Summer2 2014 Benin Ethics Course Reading Notes"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "==Thursday June 5, 2014==  :*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403)  ==Monday June 9, 2014==   ==Tuesday June 10, 2014==   ==Wednesday June 11, 2014==  :*LC...")  | 
				|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403)  | :*LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403)  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Ariely, Why We Lie===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Research on honesty with the "matrix task"  | ||
| + | ::*Shredder condition  | ||
| + | ::*Payment condition  | ||
| + | ::*Probability of getting caught condition  | ||
| + | ::*Distance of payment condition  | ||
| + | ::*Presence of a cheater condition - contagiousness   | ||
| + | ::* balancing - what the hell  | ||
| + | :*Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form vs chances of being caught  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Implications  | ||
| + | :*small-scale vs high-profile cheating  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Tips on How to report study findings===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*observational, survey, experimental  | ||
| + | :*study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given?  | ||
| + | :*what conditions were tested?  | ||
| + | :*what was the immediate result?  | ||
| + | :*what was the significance or inference to be made from the results?  | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Monday June 9, 2014==  | ==Monday June 9, 2014==  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.  | ||
| + | :*Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.  | ||
| + | :*Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists (nature), empiricists (nurture), rationalists (morality is cognitive, reasoning process)  | ||
| + | ::*Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences.  "self-constructed" - alt to nature/nurture.  | ||
| + | ::*Kohlberg's "Heinz story" - note problems, p. 9.  | ||
| + | ::*Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"  | ||
| + | :*Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches).  If Turiel was right about harm, why do so many non-western cultures moralize things like purity?  Found answers in Schweder's work.  | ||
| + | :*Schweder: sociocentric vs. individualistic cultures.  Interview subjects in sociocentric societies don't make the conventional/non-conventional distinction.  | ||
| + | :*Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm.  Showed that Schweder was right.  The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.  | ||
==Tuesday June 10, 2014==  | ==Tuesday June 10, 2014==  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*opening story  | ||
| + | :*Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors.  metaphors.  | ||
| + | :*Mind vs. Body  | ||
| + | :*Left vs. Right  | ||
| + | :*New vs. Old  | ||
| + | :*Controlled vs. Automatic  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Failures of Self-control [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQzM8jRpoh4]]  | ||
| + | :*Haidt's "disgust" studies.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially instantiated.  | ||
| Line 12: | Line 62: | ||
:*LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin  Politics  | :*LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin  Politics  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===First Group Responses: Benin Learning Community readings and Ethics Readings===  | ||
==Thursday June 12, 2014==  | ==Thursday June 12, 2014==  | ||
| Line 19: | Line 71: | ||
:*LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass:  View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week.  | :*LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass:  View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Philosophy's "rationalist delusion"  | ||
| + | :*30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson - three models of the mind  | ||
| + | :*A brief history of moral philosophy:   | ||
| + | ::*Stage 1: moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to).  Wilson's prophecy.  | ||
| + | ::*Stage 2: Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio (note studies of patients with dysfunction vmPFC)  | ||
| + | ::*Stage 3: Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology.   | ||
| + | ::*studying controlled vs. automatic process by testing under "cognitive load" -- some moral decision making not impaired by load  | ||
| + | ::*Studies of "moral dumbfounding:  | ||
| + | :::*Roach-juice  | ||
| + | :::*Soul selling  | ||
| + | :::*Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking.  | ||
| + | :*Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology  | ||
| + | ::*Wasson card selection test: Margolis' "seeing that" vs. "seeing why" -- note that morality involves the latter as well.  | ||
| + | :*Rider and Elephant  | ||
| + | ::*Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling"  | ||
| + | ::*45: Elephant and Rider defined  | ||
| + | :*Social Intuitionist Model  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer  | ||
| + | :*Priming studies:  | ||
| + | ::*"take" "often"  -- works with neutral stories also  | ||
| + | :*Research supporting "intuitions come first"  | ||
| + | :*1. Brains evaluate instantly and constantly  | ||
| + | ::*Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language  | ||
| + | :*2. Social and Political judgements intuitive  | ||
| + | ::*flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine" (affective priming)    | ||
| + | ::*Implicit Association Test      | ||
| + | ::*flashing word pairs with political terms causes dissonance.    | ||
| + | ::*Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap ju-- note: Dissonance is pain.'  | ||
| + | ::*judgements of competence.  note speed of judgement (59)  | ||
| + | :*3. Bodies guide judgements  | ||
| + | ::*Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!)  | ||
| + | ::*Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements.  "Macbeth effect"  (connection between body and morality)  | ||
| + | ::*Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism.  | ||
| + | :*4. Psychopaths: reason but don't feel  | ||
| + | ::*Robert Hare, researcher on psychpaths: testimony.  | ||
| + | :*5. Babies: feel but don't reason  | ||
| + | ::*Theory behind startle response studies in infants  | ||
| + | ::*Bloom's moral puppet shows: helper and hinderer puppet shows  | ||
| + | ::*Social interaction appraisal at six months: reaching for helper puppets  | ||
| + | :*6. Affective reactions in the brain  | ||
| + | ::*Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems -- [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WB3Q5EF4Sg The Trolley Problem]  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*When does the elephant listen to reason?  | ||
| + | ::*Friends... The Importance of Friends -- back to social intuitionism  | ||
| + | ::*Are we determined to follow the elephant (our own or our friends')? The importance of delay  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Method: Giving Philosophical Arguments in Ethics===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*Distinguish:   | ||
| + | ::*Research results   | ||
| + | ::*Significance of results  | ||
| + | ::*Justification of theories  | ||
| + | :::*What are the reasons for thinking that the nature of morality is disclosed by psychological studcies?  | ||
| + | :::*Descriptive (scientific or observational) vs. Justificatory (ought we, can we act otherwise than the way nature disposes us to act?) claims  | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 3 June 2014
Contents
- 1 Thursday June 5, 2014
 - 2 Monday June 9, 2014
 - 3 Tuesday June 10, 2014
 - 4 Wednesday June 11, 2014
 - 5 Thursday June 12, 2014
 - 6 Monday June 16, 2014
 - 7 Tuesday June 17, 2014
 - 8 Wendnesday June 18, 2014
 - 9 Thursday June 19, 2014
 - 10 Monday July 7, 2014
 - 11 Tuesday, July 8, 2014
 - 12 Wednesday, July 9, 2014
 - 13 Thursday, July 10, 2014
 - 14 Monday July 14, 2014
 - 15 Tuesday, July 15, 2014
 - 16 Wednesday, July 16, 2014
 - 17 Thursday, July 17, 2014
 
Thursday June 5, 2014
- LC Packet: Reader, The Atlantic Slave Trade (pp. 377-403)
 
Ariely, Why We Lie
- Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
 
- Shredder condition
 - Payment condition
 - Probability of getting caught condition
 - Distance of payment condition
 - Presence of a cheater condition - contagiousness
 - balancing - what the hell
 
- Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form vs chances of being caught
 
- Implications
 - small-scale vs high-profile cheating
 
Tips on How to report study findings
- observational, survey, experimental
 - study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given?
 - what conditions were tested?
 - what was the immediate result?
 - what was the significance or inference to be made from the results?
 
Monday June 9, 2014
Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1
- Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.
 - Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
 - Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists (nature), empiricists (nurture), rationalists (morality is cognitive, reasoning process)
 
- Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences. "self-constructed" - alt to nature/nurture.
 - Kohlberg's "Heinz story" - note problems, p. 9.
 - Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"
 
- Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches). If Turiel was right about harm, why do so many non-western cultures moralize things like purity? Found answers in Schweder's work.
 - Schweder: sociocentric vs. individualistic cultures. Interview subjects in sociocentric societies don't make the conventional/non-conventional distinction.
 - Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.
 
Tuesday June 10, 2014
Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"
- opening story
 - Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors. metaphors.
 - Mind vs. Body
 - Left vs. Right
 - New vs. Old
 - Controlled vs. Automatic
 
- Failures of Self-control [[1]]
 - Haidt's "disgust" studies.
 
- Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially instantiated.
 
Wednesday June 11, 2014
- LC Packet: Gardinier and Beierschenk -- Francophone Africa and Benin Politics
 
First Group Responses: Benin Learning Community readings and Ethics Readings
Thursday June 12, 2014
Monday June 16, 2014
- LC Packet: Mama, Kpai, Hass: View the Kpai and Hass video over the course of the week.
 
Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"
- Philosophy's "rationalist delusion"
 - 30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson - three models of the mind
 - A brief history of moral philosophy:
 
- Stage 1: moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to). Wilson's prophecy.
 - Stage 2: Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio (note studies of patients with dysfunction vmPFC)
 - Stage 3: Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology.
 - studying controlled vs. automatic process by testing under "cognitive load" -- some moral decision making not impaired by load
 - Studies of "moral dumbfounding:
 
- Roach-juice
 - Soul selling
 - Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking.
 
- Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology
 
- Wasson card selection test: Margolis' "seeing that" vs. "seeing why" -- note that morality involves the latter as well.
 
- Rider and Elephant
 
- Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling"
 - 45: Elephant and Rider defined
 
- Social Intuitionist Model
 
Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"
- Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer
 - Priming studies:
 
- "take" "often" -- works with neutral stories also
 
- Research supporting "intuitions come first"
 - 1. Brains evaluate instantly and constantly
 
- Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language
 
- 2. Social and Political judgements intuitive
 
- flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine" (affective priming)
 - Implicit Association Test
 - flashing word pairs with political terms causes dissonance.
 - Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap ju-- note: Dissonance is pain.'
 - judgements of competence. note speed of judgement (59)
 
- 3. Bodies guide judgements
 
- Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!)
 - Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements. "Macbeth effect" (connection between body and morality)
 - Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism.
 
- 4. Psychopaths: reason but don't feel
 
- Robert Hare, researcher on psychpaths: testimony.
 
- 5. Babies: feel but don't reason
 
- Theory behind startle response studies in infants
 - Bloom's moral puppet shows: helper and hinderer puppet shows
 - Social interaction appraisal at six months: reaching for helper puppets
 
- 6. Affective reactions in the brain
 
- Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems -- The Trolley Problem
 
- When does the elephant listen to reason?
 
- Friends... The Importance of Friends -- back to social intuitionism
 - Are we determined to follow the elephant (our own or our friends')? The importance of delay
 
Method: Giving Philosophical Arguments in Ethics
- Distinguish:
 
- Research results
 - Significance of results
 - Justification of theories
 
- What are the reasons for thinking that the nature of morality is disclosed by psychological studcies?
 - Descriptive (scientific or observational) vs. Justificatory (ought we, can we act otherwise than the way nature disposes us to act?) claims
 
Tuesday June 17, 2014
Wendnesday June 18, 2014
- LC Packet: Millenium Development Goals for Benin and Easterly reading. Browse links on Learning Community site and look up other health and development data, and save notes for in country discussion.