Difference between revisions of "Alfino"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with " Conference: [http://philevents.org/event/show/25482] ==Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"== :*starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offe...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Conference: [http://philevents.org/event/show/25482] | Conference: [http://philevents.org/event/show/25482] | ||
+ | |||
+ | NYRB review of Garton Ash's new book on Free Speech. [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/09/29/timothy-garton-ash-free-speech-say-what-you-will/] | ||
==Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"== | ==Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"== | ||
Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
:*starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offensive Speech) that a deeper explanation for changes in attutudes toward intellectual freedom would need to take into account changes in the way we think about the self. | :*starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offensive Speech) that a deeper explanation for changes in attutudes toward intellectual freedom would need to take into account changes in the way we think about the self. | ||
− | + | ===General Notes === | |
:*enlightenment self -- characterized by rights, autonomy, freedom of expression, but also toleration. Not defined by gender, race, orientation. | :*enlightenment self -- characterized by rights, autonomy, freedom of expression, but also toleration. Not defined by gender, race, orientation. | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
::*Maybe the ideals of liberty of thought that Mill articulated were never realistic. I mean he was a pretty strange guy. | ::*Maybe the ideals of liberty of thought that Mill articulated were never realistic. I mean he was a pretty strange guy. | ||
− | + | ===Critical issues=== | |
+ | |||
::*Assuming there is a problem in our historical relationship to freedom of conscience. Is there? Evidence from recent years: right not to be offended, right to be forgotten, challenges to academic freedom -- deplatforming, trigger warnings, reporting of faculty for perceived aggression. | ::*Assuming there is a problem in our historical relationship to freedom of conscience. Is there? Evidence from recent years: right not to be offended, right to be forgotten, challenges to academic freedom -- deplatforming, trigger warnings, reporting of faculty for perceived aggression. | ||
:*Sources of Enlightenment self (ripped from some Harvard professors' lecture series): | :*Sources of Enlightenment self (ripped from some Harvard professors' lecture series): | ||
Line 44: | Line 47: | ||
::*Philosophers Index: self and enlightenment, enlightenmnet and lib of thought or IF, digital self | ::*Philosophers Index: self and enlightenment, enlightenmnet and lib of thought or IF, digital self | ||
− | + | ===Digital Self=== | |
+ | |||
::*uploading of self -- transhumanism | ::*uploading of self -- transhumanism | ||
::*social media -- updatin gstatus, managing a public/private self. | ::*social media -- updatin gstatus, managing a public/private self. | ||
::*old model: public vs. private | ::*old model: public vs. private | ||
::*new model: pulbic, public-private, private | ::*new model: pulbic, public-private, private | ||
+ | |
Revision as of 20:29, 19 September 2016
Conference: [1]
NYRB review of Garton Ash's new book on Free Speech. [2]
Contents
Initial Notes and Ideas for work on "self and intellectual freedom"
- starting intuition (from Summer paper on Offensive Speech) that a deeper explanation for changes in attutudes toward intellectual freedom would need to take into account changes in the way we think about the self.
General Notes
- enlightenment self -- characterized by rights, autonomy, freedom of expression, but also toleration. Not defined by gender, race, orientation.
- track critiques -- disembodied, disconnected from tradition, identity, religion moves to the private sphere, (find article to do this)
- need to understand how Enlightenment distinguished the private self from the public self.
- what's new? postmodern self, digital self, and therapeutic self (research both)
- Sources:
- Taylor -- sources of the self
- Kant's odd distinction between public and private roles
- Declaration of Universal Rights of Man
- Hypotheses:
- Could it be that we are witnessing the "re-embodiment" of the self following the Enlightenment abstraction of the political subject?
- Could it be that we are changing the way we divide public and private spaces (partly because of the new possibilities of a digitally mediated self)?
- Maybe the ideals of liberty of thought that Mill articulated were never realistic. I mean he was a pretty strange guy.
Critical issues
- Assuming there is a problem in our historical relationship to freedom of conscience. Is there? Evidence from recent years: right not to be offended, right to be forgotten, challenges to academic freedom -- deplatforming, trigger warnings, reporting of faculty for perceived aggression.
- Sources of Enlightenment self (ripped from some Harvard professors' lecture series):
- Lockean theory of self -- first modern theory of personal identity
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Mill's self in On Liberty
- Hume scepticism of self
- The London Journal -- Boswell's diary 1762
- Rousseau's "Confessions of a Solitary Walker"
- Romanticism and the interiority of the self
- Franklin
- Adam Smith -- self as economic/moral agent
- Dangerous Liasons -- self as duplicitous
- Sources of Modern Self
- Cartesian Self
- Heliocentrism
- Christianity (context)
- Searches:
- Philosophers Index: self and enlightenment, enlightenmnet and lib of thought or IF, digital self
Digital Self
- uploading of self -- transhumanism
- social media -- updatin gstatus, managing a public/private self.
- old model: public vs. private
- new model: pulbic, public-private, private
?