Difference between revisions of "APR 15"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==26: APR 15== ===Assigned=== :*Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (580-613) (Part Two 600-613) :*Henrich, Joseph, "Hel...")
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==26: APR 15==
+
==22. APR 15==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
:*Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (580-613)  (Part Two 600-613)
 
:*Henrich, Joseph, "Hell, Free Will, and Moral Universalism" from ''The WEIRDEST People on Earth'' p. 146-148, (2)
 
  
===Some Ways of Thinking about Just Punishment===
+
:*van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles" - externalities in the production of UPF.
  
:*Some options for Theories of Punishment
+
===In Class===
  
::*'''Retributive punishment''' / retributive deterrence.  Requires very strong concept of MR and FW to be just.  Retribution is justified by "moral desert".  It can also involve "social exclusion" -- making it hard for offenders to vote or hold a job. 
+
:*Documentary report on “Seaspiracy”
  
::*'''Utilitarian models''' of punishment: General principle: Reducing harm to public and offender. 
+
===van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles"===
  
:::*Versions include: Public Health-Quarantine Model, Community welfare model (crime is a kind of welfare issue, also for communities), Rehabilitative approaches, Restorative justiceThese models can overlap and tend to assume that crime has natural causes that can either be mitigated through preventative welfare measures (addressing poverty and homelessness, for example) or through rehabilitation, confinement, and/or monitoringDoes not require a strong position on FW or MR, but these approaches can trigger liberty objections(Present discussion option here! Could you imagine a criminal insisting on being treated retributively?  Maybe.)
+
:*Pringles case.  UPF avoiding snack taxIn pringles case, ironically by claiming not much potato contentPringles eventually loses the caseVery contorted arguments. Tax evasion is a kind of externality.
  
::*Distinguishing retributive punishment from penalties.  Punishment is about painPenalties (like speeding and parking tickets) might also hurt, but they can be justified on utilitarian grounds (fewer accidents, etc.).
+
:*UPFs and climateAdditional fossil fuel inputs, inefficiency of UPF foods for meat production (feed ratio).
  
::*Grounding punishment in the consent of the punished"Thanks! I needed that!"
+
:*UPS and monoculture agriculture - Palm Oil particularly problematic258.
::*Try the "veil of ignorance" approach to finding just principles of punishment. (mention law review article)
 
  
:*We will be looking at how these models of punishment correlate with different political economies in Cavadino reading next time.
+
:*Carbon footprint of animal foods. 260 - 100g of beef 25kg of carbon dioxide / Beans .65kg.
  
===Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (Part Two)===
+
:*Soy as animal food is relatively efficient feed ratio, but requires alot of processing.  261.  To speed weight gain, we feed animals UPF feed.
  
:*See notes for part two above.
+
:*Soy and Amazon rainforest depletion. Water depletion.  Amazon goes from carbon sink to carbon producer. 
  
===Henrich, Joseph, "Hell, Free Will, and Moral Universalism"===
+
:*Antibiotic use in animal production may be contributing to anti-biotic resistance. 
  
:*This excerpt from ''The WEIRDEST People in the World'' comes in the context of a section on "universal moralizing gods" which characterize the major world religions (though Buddhism requires some discussion). H's theory is that this cultural innovation in religions allows societies to grow, solving the problems associated with living with so many strangers, something our evolved psychology did not really prepare us for. 
+
:*UPF and plastic packaging.
  
:*The three innovations of moralizing religions are:
+
===In-Class===
::*contingent afterlife:
 
::*free will: encouraged follower to believe they could comply with moral code by acts of choice and will.
 
::*moral universalism:
 
  
:*The rest of the excerpt goes into evidence of the effects of each feature on social life. The research related to free will is at top of p. 148.
+
:*Reports on documentary viewing. Reconciling reporting dates.
 +
:*SCP: Short Critical Paper on the Ethics of Eating - Assigned
  
:*What consequences, if any, does this research have for our thinking about the modern problems of free will and moral responsibility?
+
===Winders and Ransom, "Introduction to the Global Meat Industry"  ===
::*1. Cultural variants on ways of thinking about agency make (or made, in the past) real differences in social morality.
+
 
::*2. Free will has its origins in psychological adaptations that allow us to live in large societiesBut the concept seems to be at an extreme when it leads us to blame without desert.
+
:*'''Intro'''
::*3. The philosopher's concern with the metaphysical problem of free will is hard to reconcile with the cultural utility of a belief in free willIf FW is cultural why do we care about it's metaphysical grounding? It's grounded in evolved human social behaviors (culture).
+
 
::*4. When you tell your future kids "You can do it if you tryDon't let other people control your decisionsWhat do you want to do with your life?" you may really be motivating them to take up a particular set of values to approach challengesBut notice this is only valuable motivationally.
+
::*major concerns and questions: expansion of global meat industry makes several problems worse: environmental damage, effects on climate change, clean water, food insecurity, world hunger, consumer health, workers' rights and well-being, and (not least of all) the treatment of animals. 
 +
::*Note: the ethical case against meat is not limited to the problem of animal ethics.  Some of the non-animal ethics problems can be ameliorated by not participating in the industrial supply chain. 
 +
::*Paradoxically, increased meat production can create food insecurity for some. 2.
 +
 
 +
::*Global meat industry is a product of gov't and industry collaborating:
 +
::*Overproduces food animals relative to population.
 +
::*Creates dangers for environment and workers. (esp. from hyperslaughter)
 +
 
 +
:*'''Global Meat Industry, 1960-2016'''
 +
 
 +
::*Per capita consumption doubled from 1960 to 2016: 20kg/person/year to 40.  Mostly in Global North. 
 +
::*US has highest consumption by this data: 113.9kg/person/year (250 pounds a year! 4.8 pounds a week.)
 +
::*45 million metric tons (MMT) to 259 MMT.
 +
::*$65 billion to about $400 billion.
 +
::*US meat exports '60 to '15 -- 2.6 MMT to 27 MMT -- We're not doing this to feed us?
 +
::*Note meat consumption increases occurred while population was also increasing. Population increase 1960-2016 3 billion to 7.4. 
 +
 
 +
::*Note that US has declined from peak consumption, also some Europeans, esp Denmark, Netherlands, and French. 
 +
::*Increases in numbers of animals: 270% for pigs and 900% for chickens. Over 1.4 billion cows and pigs.
 +
 
 +
::*Meat exports: most from global north.  Asian and emerging industrial countries big importers.  ('''Meat consumption follows wealth increases'''.) p. 12: increases in China, for example, 3.5kg to 57.6kg, Mexico almost tripled, Russia doubled.
 +
 
 +
:*'''How did global meat grow so much?'''
 +
::*1. Increases in feed grain productionNow more global feed grain production than food grain production (rice and wheat). Along with ag tech to put more land into production, GE corn and soybeans increased yields.
 +
::*2. Trade policies - WTO - promotes free trade agreements for meat import/export.
 +
::*3. increased corporate concentration.  both production and processing.
 +
::*Concentration of processing produced scaling up.  Read from p. 15.  (Recall Maureen Ogle's history chapter.)
 +
 
 +
::*former communist countries became markets.
 +
 +
:*'''Consequences of global meat for consideration'''
 +
::*1. Corporate concentration - Global food corporations exert significant power over farmers and national governments. Many poor countries with food insecurity export meat to wealthier countries. 
 +
::*2. Tension bt. cheap meat and food insecurity - Smallholder meat production in decline from competition.
 +
::*3. Social and environmental injustice. Many environmental effects of meat production fall disproportionately on poor countries and poor within rich countries.
 +
 
 +
===SCP: Ethics of Eating Animals===
 +
 
 +
:*'''Stage 1''': Please write an 800-1000 hundred word essay on the following prompt by '''Monday, April 22, 2023, 11:59pm.'''
 +
::*Topic: Consider various arguments and information we have been discussing related to both the ethics of eating animals and food from animals (such as egg and dairy products).  Which are the strongest?  Which are the weakest?  How do ethical arguments about eating animals apply differently to different food animals and products or contexts?  If you do not find any of the arguments persuasive, try to provide an alternative position.  Otherwise, indicate, drawing on your knowledge of dietary change, what steps a carnivore might make to "trade up" to a more ethical eating pattern.
 +
 
 +
:*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate.  I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''.  Collaboration  is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the classThe best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer.  Keep it verbal.  Generate your own examples.  
 +
 
 +
:*Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. '''You will lose points''' if you do not follow these instructions:
 +
 
 +
::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]].
 +
::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.   
 +
::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''You may put your student ID number in the file, but '''not in the filename'''. Save your file for this assignment with the name: EatingAnimals.
 +
::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#3: Ethics of Eating Animals" dropbox.
 +
::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points. 
 +
 
 +
:*'''Stage 2''': I will grade and briefly comment on your writing using the peer scores as an initial rankingAssuming the process works normally, most of my scores probably be within 1-2 points of the peer scores, plus or minus.

Latest revision as of 21:57, 15 April 2024

22. APR 15

Assigned Work

  • van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles" - externalities in the production of UPF.

In Class

  • Documentary report on “Seaspiracy”

van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles"

  • Pringles case. UPF avoiding snack tax. In pringles case, ironically by claiming not much potato content. Pringles eventually loses the case. Very contorted arguments. Tax evasion is a kind of externality.
  • UPFs and climate. Additional fossil fuel inputs, inefficiency of UPF foods for meat production (feed ratio).
  • UPS and monoculture agriculture - Palm Oil particularly problematic. 258.
  • Carbon footprint of animal foods. 260 - 100g of beef 25kg of carbon dioxide / Beans .65kg.
  • Soy as animal food is relatively efficient feed ratio, but requires alot of processing. 261. To speed weight gain, we feed animals UPF feed.
  • Soy and Amazon rainforest depletion. Water depletion. Amazon goes from carbon sink to carbon producer.
  • Antibiotic use in animal production may be contributing to anti-biotic resistance.
  • UPF and plastic packaging.

In-Class

  • Reports on documentary viewing. Reconciling reporting dates.
  • SCP: Short Critical Paper on the Ethics of Eating - Assigned

Winders and Ransom, "Introduction to the Global Meat Industry"

  • Intro
  • major concerns and questions: expansion of global meat industry makes several problems worse: environmental damage, effects on climate change, clean water, food insecurity, world hunger, consumer health, workers' rights and well-being, and (not least of all) the treatment of animals.
  • Note: the ethical case against meat is not limited to the problem of animal ethics. Some of the non-animal ethics problems can be ameliorated by not participating in the industrial supply chain.
  • Paradoxically, increased meat production can create food insecurity for some. 2.
  • Global meat industry is a product of gov't and industry collaborating:
  • Overproduces food animals relative to population.
  • Creates dangers for environment and workers. (esp. from hyperslaughter)
  • Global Meat Industry, 1960-2016
  • Per capita consumption doubled from 1960 to 2016: 20kg/person/year to 40. Mostly in Global North.
  • US has highest consumption by this data: 113.9kg/person/year (250 pounds a year! 4.8 pounds a week.)
  • 45 million metric tons (MMT) to 259 MMT.
  • $65 billion to about $400 billion.
  • US meat exports '60 to '15 -- 2.6 MMT to 27 MMT -- We're not doing this to feed us?
  • Note meat consumption increases occurred while population was also increasing. Population increase 1960-2016 3 billion to 7.4.
  • Note that US has declined from peak consumption, also some Europeans, esp Denmark, Netherlands, and French.
  • Increases in numbers of animals: 270% for pigs and 900% for chickens. Over 1.4 billion cows and pigs.
  • Meat exports: most from global north. Asian and emerging industrial countries big importers. (Meat consumption follows wealth increases.) p. 12: increases in China, for example, 3.5kg to 57.6kg, Mexico almost tripled, Russia doubled.
  • How did global meat grow so much?
  • 1. Increases in feed grain production. Now more global feed grain production than food grain production (rice and wheat). Along with ag tech to put more land into production, GE corn and soybeans increased yields.
  • 2. Trade policies - WTO - promotes free trade agreements for meat import/export.
  • 3. increased corporate concentration. both production and processing.
  • Concentration of processing produced scaling up. Read from p. 15. (Recall Maureen Ogle's history chapter.)
  • former communist countries became markets.
  • Consequences of global meat for consideration
  • 1. Corporate concentration - Global food corporations exert significant power over farmers and national governments. Many poor countries with food insecurity export meat to wealthier countries.
  • 2. Tension bt. cheap meat and food insecurity - Smallholder meat production in decline from competition.
  • 3. Social and environmental injustice. Many environmental effects of meat production fall disproportionately on poor countries and poor within rich countries.

SCP: Ethics of Eating Animals

  • Stage 1: Please write an 800-1000 hundred word essay on the following prompt by Monday, April 22, 2023, 11:59pm.
  • Topic: Consider various arguments and information we have been discussing related to both the ethics of eating animals and food from animals (such as egg and dairy products). Which are the strongest? Which are the weakest? How do ethical arguments about eating animals apply differently to different food animals and products or contexts? If you do not find any of the arguments persuasive, try to provide an alternative position. Otherwise, indicate, drawing on your knowledge of dietary change, what steps a carnivore might make to "trade up" to a more ethical eating pattern.
  • Advice about collaboration: Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, verbally. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples.
  • Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions:
  1. To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [click here].
  2. Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.
  3. Do not put your name in the file or filename. You may put your student ID number in the file, but not in the filename. Save your file for this assignment with the name: EatingAnimals.
  4. To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#3: Ethics of Eating Animals" dropbox.
  5. If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) before the deadline or you will lose points.
  • Stage 2: I will grade and briefly comment on your writing using the peer scores as an initial ranking. Assuming the process works normally, most of my scores probably be within 1-2 points of the peer scores, plus or minus.