Difference between revisions of "FEB 27"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "==11. FEB 27: Unit 3: Gastronomy, Neurogastronomy, and Dietary Change== ===Assigned Work=== :*Barber, Dan. Chapter 30: "Seed" from '''The 3rd Plate''' (382-409) (27) :*The b...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | ==13: FEB 27. == |
− | |||
− | :* | + | ===Assigned=== |
− | :* | + | |
− | + | :*Tribe, Lawrence. "Deconstructing Dobbs" (2nd half, 9-17) | |
− | + | :*Alfino, "Interpretation, Political Orientation, and the Basic Liberties in the Dobbs Decision" (12-end) | |
===In-class=== | ===In-class=== | ||
− | :* | + | :*Assign SW2: What are Basic Liberties? Small group discussion on Personal information and family liberties. |
− | + | ::*Small group: Basic understand of Dobbs decision and related issues. | |
− | + | :::*In your small group, work through these questions to check on your understand. | |
− | + | ::::*What was the basic thinking on abortion in the Roe and Casey courts? | |
− | + | ::::*How did the majority decide Dobbs? Explain the role of interpretive theories of the constitution in this decision (originalism v living document). | |
− | + | ::::*Does abortion seem like a "majoritarian" (statutory) right or a "basic liberty" (constitutional or otherwise protected from rule by a simple majority of either state or federal government)? Try out arguments either way. | |
− | ::* | + | ::::*Keep track of questions that arise during your discussion. |
− | : | ||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | : | ||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :: | ||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | :::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :: | ||
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :*Some basic data on abortions from Pew [https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/01/11/what-the-data-says-about-abortion-in-the-u-s-2/]. |
+ | ::*Comparing gestational limits by country.[https://righttolife.org.uk/what-are-the-abortion-time-limits-in-eu-countries]. Note: This is from a right to life group, but I have seen similar data elsewhere. | ||
− | + | ===Tribe, "Deconstructing Dobbs" 2nd half (p. 8-12)=== | |
− | :* | + | :*Tribe thinks only a religious view of the embryo supports this view. "Republican form of government" seems antithetical to a theocracy. Other evidence that the court is reflecting a preference for Christian thought in reading the 1st amendement. (Note: Alabama judge in IVF case invokes religious language in decisions. [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/22/ivf-opinion-from-alabama-justice-was-overtly-religious/72689378007/] |
+ | ::*Tribe sees elements of a "tyranny of the minority" in Dobbs, but also in Kennedy v Bremmerton (religious fball coach). He also thinks that the fact that 3 of the justices were appointed by a president who lost the majority vote is relevant. | ||
+ | ::*Tribe also feels the court Majority is being inconsistent in its interpretive theory in the case of Bruen, which treats the right to concealed carry of guns as grounded in the 2nd amendment, even though the types of guns did not exist in our "history and traditions". | ||
+ | :*In the remaining 2-3 pages Tribe extends his argument against the conservative court by objecting to other putatively radical decisions it has made. | ||
− | === | + | ===More "language of basic liberties"=== |
− | : | + | :*In addition to your liberty to control your body, bodily autonomy, and intimacy, we recognize (by statute and judicial opinion) basic liberties to control some personal information and to direct the upbringing of your children (parental rights) and other protections for family life. At a practical level, parental rights often involve schooling, which is local in our society. Still, cases reach the Supreme Court. |
− | :* | + | :*Personal Information Examples |
− | :* | + | ::*A law requiring you to share your browsing history with the government. |
+ | ::*A law requiring you to share your medical records with the government. | ||
+ | ::*A law requiring you to send a full frontal nude picture of yourself to the government every 5 years. | ||
+ | ::*A law allowing anyone to discover your bank account balances. | ||
+ | ::*A law requiring you to explain your reasons for divorce to a judge (before “no fault”divorce). | ||
+ | ::*A law conferring a “right to be forgotten” (to have internet information about you deleted). This is a right guaranteed in the European Union. | ||
− | :* | + | :*Family and Parental Rights Examples |
− | :* | + | ::*A law prohibiting parents from exempting their kids from some sex education programs. |
− | ::* | + | :::*But maybe not: A law allowing parents to exempt their kids from hearing basic public health information, including information about sexually transmitted diseases. |
− | ::* | + | ::*A law requiring family members to testify against each other. |
− | :* | + | :::*But maybe not: A law preventing the government from checking on child welfare and acting on serious problems, including removing children from their parents’ care. |
+ | ::*A zoning ordinance prohibiting grandparents from living with their families (actual controversy). | ||
+ | ::*A zoning ordinance prohibiting polyamorous households in a neighborhood. (!) | ||
+ | ::*A law prohibiting home schooling. | ||
+ | ::*A law prohibiting parents and their children from receiving gender affirming care. | ||
+ | :::*But maybe not: A law allowing parents to chose any elective surgery they wish for their kids. | ||
− | : | + | ===Planning your SW2: Organizing your thoughts on Basic Liberties and Abortion Rights=== |
− | :* | + | :*Consider the following questions as you prepare to write about Basic Liberties and Abortion rights |
− | : | + | ::*Is there a constitutional basic liberty (or liberties) at stake in the abortion rights issue? Use your "language of basic liberties" to express this or to say why there isn't one. |
− | :* | + | ::*If there is a right to elective abortion, how should we think about it? |
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | :* | ||
− | : | + | :::*1. As a balance between the liberty interests of the fetus/baby and the host/mother? |
− | : | + | ::::*possible balancing points: Conception (some pro life), "Clear opportunity" (gestational limits/ Roberts), Viability (Roe/Casey) |
− | : | ||
− | :* | ||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :::*2. As a majoritarian issue -- any law expressing a "rational basis" may be constitutional |
− | :* | + | :::*3. A new constitutional amendment -- |
+ | ::*Argument strategies: | ||
+ | :::*Determine that abortion rights is "more like" other matters that are or aren't basic liberties. | ||
+ | :::*For prolife: Begin with some form or personhood for the fetus and then consider competing liberty claims. | ||
− | : | + | ===SW2: What are Basic Liberties (800 words)=== |
− | :* | + | :*'''Stage 1''': Please write an 800 word maximum answer to the following question by '''Saturday March 2, 2023, 11:59pm.''' |
− | : | + | ::*Topic: Drawing on resources from this unit and your own reflection, devote the first part of your essay (150-350 words) to these questions: What is your theory of basic liberties? What makes something a basic liberty and why are they important? Then, in the second part, apply your view about basic liberties to the abortion question, taking into account our work in this unit. How would you have decided Dobbs based on your view of whether abortion is a constitutionally protected basic liberty? Be sure sure to address the strongest arguments for a view opposing yours. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | : | + | ::*Notes: You have more discretion here about how much space to give each major part of the essay than in SW1. |
− | :* | + | :*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples. |
− | :* | + | :*Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. '''You will lose points''' if you do not follow these instructions: |
− | : | + | ::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]]. |
+ | ::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph. | ||
+ | ::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''. You may put your student ID number in the file. Always put a word count in the file. Save your file for this assignment with the name: '''BasicLiberties'''. | ||
+ | ::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the '''"1 SW2 - Points"''' dropbox. | ||
+ | ::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points. | ||
− | :* | + | :*'''Stage 2''': Please evaluate '''four''' student answers and provide brief comments and a score. Review the [[Assignment Rubric]] for this exercise. We will be using the Flow and Content areas of the rubric for this assignment. Complete your evaluations and scoring by '''Thursday, March 7, 2023, 11:59pm.''' |
+ | |||
+ | ::*To determine the papers you need to peer review, open the file called "#Key.xls" in the shared folder. You will see a worksheet with saint names in alphabetically order, along with animal names. Find your saint name and review the next four (4) animals' work below your animal name. If you get to the bottom of the list before reaching 4 animals, go to the top of the list and continue. | ||
− | : | + | ::*Use [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSca2C-a7XJpi09qCt3wAd1jmi5gPJ2vR-6I3L8ZQDNQ4ZOQwA/viewform?usp=sf_link this Google Form] to evaluate '''four''' peer papers. Submit the form once for each review. |
− | :* | + | ::*Some papers may arrive late. If you are in line to review a missing paper, allow a day or two for it to show up. If it does not show up, go back to the key and review the next animal's paper, continuing until you get four reviews. Do not review more than four papers. |
− | :* | + | :*'''Stage 3''': I will grade and briefly comment on your writing using the peer scores as an initial ranking. Assuming the process works normally, most of my scores probably be within 1-2 points of the peer scores, plus or minus. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | : | + | :*'''Stage 4''': Back-evaluation: After you receive your peer comments and my evaluation, take a few minutes to fill out this quick "back evaluation" rating form: [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdgKCYITDTSOOHcvC3TAVNK-EZDsP4jiiyPj-7jdpRoNUsLPA/viewform?usp=sf_link]. '''Fill out the form for each reviewer, but not Alfino.''' '''You must do the back evaluation to receive credit for the whole assignment.''' Failing to give back-evaluations unfairly affects other classmates. |
− | : | + | ::*Back evaluations are due '''TBD, 11:59pm'''. |
− | :* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 21:03, 27 February 2024
Contents
13: FEB 27.
Assigned
- Tribe, Lawrence. "Deconstructing Dobbs" (2nd half, 9-17)
- Alfino, "Interpretation, Political Orientation, and the Basic Liberties in the Dobbs Decision" (12-end)
In-class
- Assign SW2: What are Basic Liberties? Small group discussion on Personal information and family liberties.
- Small group: Basic understand of Dobbs decision and related issues.
- In your small group, work through these questions to check on your understand.
- What was the basic thinking on abortion in the Roe and Casey courts?
- How did the majority decide Dobbs? Explain the role of interpretive theories of the constitution in this decision (originalism v living document).
- Does abortion seem like a "majoritarian" (statutory) right or a "basic liberty" (constitutional or otherwise protected from rule by a simple majority of either state or federal government)? Try out arguments either way.
- Keep track of questions that arise during your discussion.
- Some basic data on abortions from Pew [1].
- Comparing gestational limits by country.[2]. Note: This is from a right to life group, but I have seen similar data elsewhere.
Tribe, "Deconstructing Dobbs" 2nd half (p. 8-12)
- Tribe thinks only a religious view of the embryo supports this view. "Republican form of government" seems antithetical to a theocracy. Other evidence that the court is reflecting a preference for Christian thought in reading the 1st amendement. (Note: Alabama judge in IVF case invokes religious language in decisions. [3]
- Tribe sees elements of a "tyranny of the minority" in Dobbs, but also in Kennedy v Bremmerton (religious fball coach). He also thinks that the fact that 3 of the justices were appointed by a president who lost the majority vote is relevant.
- Tribe also feels the court Majority is being inconsistent in its interpretive theory in the case of Bruen, which treats the right to concealed carry of guns as grounded in the 2nd amendment, even though the types of guns did not exist in our "history and traditions".
- In the remaining 2-3 pages Tribe extends his argument against the conservative court by objecting to other putatively radical decisions it has made.
More "language of basic liberties"
- In addition to your liberty to control your body, bodily autonomy, and intimacy, we recognize (by statute and judicial opinion) basic liberties to control some personal information and to direct the upbringing of your children (parental rights) and other protections for family life. At a practical level, parental rights often involve schooling, which is local in our society. Still, cases reach the Supreme Court.
- Personal Information Examples
- A law requiring you to share your browsing history with the government.
- A law requiring you to share your medical records with the government.
- A law requiring you to send a full frontal nude picture of yourself to the government every 5 years.
- A law allowing anyone to discover your bank account balances.
- A law requiring you to explain your reasons for divorce to a judge (before “no fault”divorce).
- A law conferring a “right to be forgotten” (to have internet information about you deleted). This is a right guaranteed in the European Union.
- Family and Parental Rights Examples
- A law prohibiting parents from exempting their kids from some sex education programs.
- But maybe not: A law allowing parents to exempt their kids from hearing basic public health information, including information about sexually transmitted diseases.
- A law requiring family members to testify against each other.
- But maybe not: A law preventing the government from checking on child welfare and acting on serious problems, including removing children from their parents’ care.
- A zoning ordinance prohibiting grandparents from living with their families (actual controversy).
- A zoning ordinance prohibiting polyamorous households in a neighborhood. (!)
- A law prohibiting home schooling.
- A law prohibiting parents and their children from receiving gender affirming care.
- But maybe not: A law allowing parents to chose any elective surgery they wish for their kids.
Planning your SW2: Organizing your thoughts on Basic Liberties and Abortion Rights
- Consider the following questions as you prepare to write about Basic Liberties and Abortion rights
- Is there a constitutional basic liberty (or liberties) at stake in the abortion rights issue? Use your "language of basic liberties" to express this or to say why there isn't one.
- If there is a right to elective abortion, how should we think about it?
- 1. As a balance between the liberty interests of the fetus/baby and the host/mother?
- possible balancing points: Conception (some pro life), "Clear opportunity" (gestational limits/ Roberts), Viability (Roe/Casey)
- 2. As a majoritarian issue -- any law expressing a "rational basis" may be constitutional
- 3. A new constitutional amendment --
- Argument strategies:
- Determine that abortion rights is "more like" other matters that are or aren't basic liberties.
- For prolife: Begin with some form or personhood for the fetus and then consider competing liberty claims.
SW2: What are Basic Liberties (800 words)
- Stage 1: Please write an 800 word maximum answer to the following question by Saturday March 2, 2023, 11:59pm.
- Topic: Drawing on resources from this unit and your own reflection, devote the first part of your essay (150-350 words) to these questions: What is your theory of basic liberties? What makes something a basic liberty and why are they important? Then, in the second part, apply your view about basic liberties to the abortion question, taking into account our work in this unit. How would you have decided Dobbs based on your view of whether abortion is a constitutionally protected basic liberty? Be sure sure to address the strongest arguments for a view opposing yours.
- Notes: You have more discretion here about how much space to give each major part of the essay than in SW1.
- Advice about collaboration: Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, verbally. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples.
- Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions:
- To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [click here].
- Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.
- Do not put your name in the file or filename. You may put your student ID number in the file. Always put a word count in the file. Save your file for this assignment with the name: BasicLiberties.
- To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "1 SW2 - Points" dropbox.
- If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) before the deadline or you will lose points.
- Stage 2: Please evaluate four student answers and provide brief comments and a score. Review the Assignment Rubric for this exercise. We will be using the Flow and Content areas of the rubric for this assignment. Complete your evaluations and scoring by Thursday, March 7, 2023, 11:59pm.
- To determine the papers you need to peer review, open the file called "#Key.xls" in the shared folder. You will see a worksheet with saint names in alphabetically order, along with animal names. Find your saint name and review the next four (4) animals' work below your animal name. If you get to the bottom of the list before reaching 4 animals, go to the top of the list and continue.
- Use this Google Form to evaluate four peer papers. Submit the form once for each review.
- Some papers may arrive late. If you are in line to review a missing paper, allow a day or two for it to show up. If it does not show up, go back to the key and review the next animal's paper, continuing until you get four reviews. Do not review more than four papers.
- Stage 3: I will grade and briefly comment on your writing using the peer scores as an initial ranking. Assuming the process works normally, most of my scores probably be within 1-2 points of the peer scores, plus or minus.
- Stage 4: Back-evaluation: After you receive your peer comments and my evaluation, take a few minutes to fill out this quick "back evaluation" rating form: [4]. Fill out the form for each reviewer, but not Alfino. You must do the back evaluation to receive credit for the whole assignment. Failing to give back-evaluations unfairly affects other classmates.
- Back evaluations are due TBD, 11:59pm.