Difference between revisions of "Standardized Testing"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
By Andrew Hickman | By Andrew Hickman | ||
| + | |||
| + | =The Debate Over Standardized Testing= | ||
| + | Boston, Carol. "The Debate Over National Testing." ERIC Digest. 2001. ERIC. 08 Apr. 2008 <http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/29/cc/50.pdf>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''A good article that explores both sides of the debate over national testing, but focuses attention on the the negative aspects. Makes some good points about why testing can be considered invalid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | By Lauren Ames | ||
Revision as of 03:30, 18 April 2008
Colleges Making SAT Optional as Admissions Requirement
Murray, Charles. "Colleges Making SAT Optional as Admissions Requirement." The Education Digest (2007): 1-11. Proquest. 5 Apr. 2008. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=14&sid=4&srchmode=1&vins
This article rocks. It comes from the Education Digest and was published in December 2007. It provides a good opinion to abolish the SAT. It is a summary of credible websites and admission officers and University officials displaying their opinions about its inaccuracy of predicting freshmen in college grades.
By Andrew Hickman
The Debate Over Standardized Testing
Boston, Carol. "The Debate Over National Testing." ERIC Digest. 2001. ERIC. 08 Apr. 2008 <http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/29/cc/50.pdf>.
A good article that explores both sides of the debate over national testing, but focuses attention on the the negative aspects. Makes some good points about why testing can be considered invalid.
By Lauren Ames
