Difference between revisions of "Spring 2013 Ethics Course Lecture Notes A"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 219: Line 219:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
! !! Prisoner Smith stays silent(''cooperates'') !! Prisoner Smith betrays (''defects'')
+
! !! Prisoner B: Smith stays silent(''cooperates'') !! Prisoner B: Smith betrays (''defects'')
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Prisoner A (you) stays silent (''cooperates'')
 
! Prisoner A (you) stays silent (''cooperates'')
| Each serves 1 year|| Prisoner A (you): 3 years<br/>Prisoner Smith: goes free
+
| Each serves 1 year|| Prisoner A (you): 3 years<br/>Prisoner B: Smith: goes free
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Prisoner A (you) betrays (''defects'')
 
! Prisoner A (you) betrays (''defects'')
| Prisoner A (you): goes free<br/>Prisoner Smith: 3 years || Each serves 2 years
+
| Prisoner A (you): goes free<br/>Prisoner B: Smith: 3 years || Each serves 2 years
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 09:12, 30 January 2013

Return to Ethics

These are the notes you will see displayed in class. They can be correlated to study questions for each class day.

January 07

First Class Topics

  • Course, Materials (books, pdfs, and clicker), and Goals
  • Course Methods and web sites - view course research questions
  • Course website -- for reading schedule, grading scheme, email, pdfs, audio from class, audio comments on assignments
  • Course wiki -- for basic course information, lecture notes, study questions.
  • Einstruction site - for registering your clicker, viewing clicker questions.
  • A typical prep cycle for the course: read, engage, review, prep SQs.
  • Time commitment: 6 hours per week as a baseline.
  • Grading Schemes: overview.
  • Ereserves - pdfs for course reading not in book form.

January 08

Cooper, Chapter 1, Introduction to Philosophical Ethics

  • Defining Ethics: Cooper's pragmatic definition, and others
  • Levels of value reflection: actions, institutions, principles, theory, meta-theory
  • The Zimbardo Prison Experiment: implications
  • Example of philosophical method.
  • Core ethical principles or intutions that are the basis of ethical theories. p. 23

January 10

Ariely, Why We Lie

  • Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
  • Shredder condition
  • Payment condition
  • Probability of getting caught condition
  • Distance of payment condition
  • Presence of a cheater condition
  • Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form
  • Implications

Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1

  • Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.
  • Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
  • Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists, empiricists, rationalists
  • Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences.
  • Kohlberg's "Heinz story,"
  • Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"
Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches).
Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.

January 14

  • Small Group Discussion: factors affecting breaks with situational control.

Cooper, Chapter 5: Cognitive and Moral Development

  • Review of Piaget's stage of cognitive development:
  • Sensorimotor, Symbolic, Concrete, Formal
  • Critics: missing variability from rich vs. poor environments. (Vygotsky)
  • Importance of Formal Operational level for "breaking" with situational control.
  • Kohlberg's stage of moral development
  • Preconventional, Conventional, Postconventional
  • Application to My Lai massacre

January 15

Singer, Chapter 1, "About Ethics," from Practical Ethics

  • Ethics and religion
  • Ethics and relativism -- different versions of relativism:
  • Ethics varies by culture: true and false, same act under different conditions may have different value. Examples?
  • Marxist relativism and non-relativism
  • Problems for relativists: consistency across time, polls could determine ethics
  • Problems for the subjectivist: making sense of disagreement
  • Singer: Ok to say the values aren't objective like physics, but not sensible to deny the meaningfulness of moral disagreement. Ethical reasoning.
  • Singer's view (one of several major positions): p. 10
  • The sorts of reasons that count as ethical: universalizable ones.
  • "Interests" in utilitarian thought

January 17

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book 1

  • Politics as the master science: it's end, happiness
  • Defects of the life of pleasure, honor, even virtue as the meaning of happiness. Defect of money-making.
  • Section 7: argument for happiness as the final end of life.
  • But what is it? Search for the function of man to find the answer.
  • Nutrition and growth?
  • Perception?
  • Activity of the soul in accordance with virtue?
  • Other characteristics needed: complete life, active life.
  • Section 13: Aristotle's tripartite division of the soul:
  • Rational
  • Apetitive (desiring) (partly rational)
  • Vegetative

January 21

Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"

  • Philosophy's "rationalist delusion"
  • 30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson
  • moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to).
  • Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio
  • Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology
  • Roach-juice
  • Soul selling
  • Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking.
  • Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology
  • Wasson card selection test: seeing that vs. seeing why
  • Rider and Elephant
  • Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling"
  • 45: Elephant and Rider defined
  • Social Intuitionist Model

January 22

Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"

  • Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer
  • Priming studies:
  • "take" "often" -- working with neutral stories also
  • Research supporting "intuitions come first"
  • Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language
  • Social and Political judgements intuitive
  • flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine"
  • Implicit Association Test
  • flashing word pairs with political terms.
  • Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap judgements of competence.
  • Bodies guides judgements
  • Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!)
  • Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements.
  • Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism.
  • Psychopaths: reason but don't feel
  • Babies: feel but don't reason
  • helper and hinderer puppet shows
  • reaching for helper puppets
  • Affective reactions in the brain
  • Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems
  • When does the elephant listen to reason?
  • Friends...

January 24

Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, Book II

  • Virtue not possessed by nature, but potential.
  • Role of habit (ethos --> ethike) compare to other things we need training for.
  • Section 4: Differences between virtue and the arts. Virture requires:
  • Act chosen in knowledge
  • Chosen by the agent
  • For its own sake
  • Proceeding from character.
  • Virtue in the soul: passsions, faculties or states of character.
  • Virtue makes its object excellent.
  • Virtue as a mean that is also an excellence
  • Courage as the mean between fear and foolhardiness
  • Generosity (liberality)
  • Temperance
  • Proper pride
  • Anger (?)
  • Wittiness (vs. Buffoonery and Boorishness)
  • Assessing Aristotle's view

January 28

Aristotle, Book III, Nichomachean Ethics

  • Distinguishing the "voluntary" from the "involuntary" (chracteristics and cases)
  • Acting from cumpulsion
  • Acting "in ignorance" vs. "out of ignorance"
  • Choice, more specific than the voluntary, distinguished from wish
  • Deliberation
  • Aristotle on the topic, "No man errs willingly" (cf. Plato/Socrates) - "becoming wiked"
  • Courage: not just about fear. Noble ends.
  • Temperance: exemptions for pleaures and activities informed by reason.
  • cf. Don Giovanni -- the intemperate lover


Aristotle's methods & Philosophical Method

  • Review of Philosophical Methods
  • Review of specific methods in Aristotle
  • What makes thought philosophical?

January 29

Haidt, Chapter 4, "Vote for Me (Here's Why)"

  • Ring of Gyges
  • Tetlock: accountability research
  • Exploratory vs. Confirmatory thought
  • Conditions promoting exploratory thought 1) knowing ahead of time that you'll be called to account; 2) not knowing what the audience thinks; 3) believing that the audience is well informed and interested in truth or accuracy.
  • Leary's research on self-esteem importance
  • Confirmation bias
  • Wasson again -- number series
  • Deann Kuhn --
  • David Perkins research on reason giving
  • Can I believe it? vs. Must I believe it?
  • Application to political beliefs: Drew Westen's fMRI research.
  • Good thinking as an emergent property.

Implications of Haidt's viewpoint for thinking about values

January 31

Rachels, Chapter 6, The Social Contract Theory

  • Hobbes: morality as solution to practical problem
  • Life in the state of nature: nasty, brutish and short
  • Why? equal need, scarcity, equality of power, limited altruism
  • Solution to the problem of self-interest: the social contract (def p. 85)
  • Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner B: Smith stays silent(cooperates) Prisoner B: Smith betrays (defects)
Prisoner A (you) stays silent (cooperates) Each serves 1 year Prisoner A (you): 3 years
Prisoner B: Smith: goes free
Prisoner A (you) betrays (defects) Prisoner A (you): goes free
Prisoner B: Smith: 3 years
Each serves 2 years
  • Pay off matrix for any outcome:
  • Smith stays silent, you betray him: 10, 0
  • Smith betrays you, you stay silent: 0,10
  • Both stay betray: 5 years each
  • Neither betray: 1 year each
  • Smith stays silent (cooperates) or betrays you (defects)

February 04

February 05

February 07

February 11

February 12

February 14

February 18

February 19

February 21

February 25

February 26

February 27

March 04

March 05

March 07

March 18

March 19

March 21

March 25

March 26

March 28

April 01

April 02

April 04

April 08

April 09

April 11