Difference between revisions of "Spring 2013 Ethics Course Lecture Notes A"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→January 31) |
|||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
:*Pay off matrix for any outcome: | :*Pay off matrix for any outcome: | ||
− | ::*Smith stays silent (cooperate), you betray (defects): 3, 0 | + | ::*Smith stays silent (cooperate), you betray (defects): 3, 0 (Smith's a sucker) |
− | ::*Smith betrays (defects), you stay silent (cooperate): 0,3 | + | ::*Smith betrays (defects), you stay silent (cooperate): 0,3 (You're a sucker) |
− | ::*Both betray (defect): 2 years each | + | ::*Both betray (defect): 2 years each (Game theoretic outcome) |
− | ::*Both (cooperate): 1 year each | + | ::*Both (cooperate): 1 year each (Optimal outcome for combined interests/utility) |
− | :*Why should you defect? | + | :*Why should you defect no matter what Smith does? |
::*Analyze both possibilities for Smith | ::*Analyze both possibilities for Smith | ||
+ | |||
::*He stays silent (cooperates) | ::*He stays silent (cooperates) | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 30 January 2013
Return to Ethics
These are the notes you will see displayed in class. They can be correlated to study questions for each class day.
Contents
- 1 January 07
- 2 January 08
- 3 January 10
- 4 January 14
- 5 January 15
- 6 January 17
- 7 January 21
- 8 January 22
- 9 January 24
- 10 January 28
- 11 January 29
- 12 January 31
- 13 February 04
- 14 February 05
- 15 February 07
- 16 February 11
- 17 February 12
- 18 February 14
- 19 February 18
- 20 February 19
- 21 February 21
- 22 February 25
- 23 February 26
- 24 February 27
- 25 March 04
- 26 March 05
- 27 March 07
- 28 March 18
- 29 March 19
- 30 March 21
- 31 March 25
- 32 March 26
- 33 March 28
- 34 April 01
- 35 April 02
- 36 April 04
- 37 April 08
- 38 April 09
- 39 April 11
January 07
First Class Topics
- Course, Materials (books, pdfs, and clicker), and Goals
- Course Methods and web sites - view course research questions
- Course website -- for reading schedule, grading scheme, email, pdfs, audio from class, audio comments on assignments
- Course wiki -- for basic course information, lecture notes, study questions.
- Einstruction site - for registering your clicker, viewing clicker questions.
- A typical prep cycle for the course: read, engage, review, prep SQs.
- Time commitment: 6 hours per week as a baseline.
- Grading Schemes: overview.
- Ereserves - pdfs for course reading not in book form.
January 08
Cooper, Chapter 1, Introduction to Philosophical Ethics
- Defining Ethics: Cooper's pragmatic definition, and others
- Levels of value reflection: actions, institutions, principles, theory, meta-theory
- The Zimbardo Prison Experiment: implications
- Example of philosophical method.
- Core ethical principles or intutions that are the basis of ethical theories. p. 23
January 10
Ariely, Why We Lie
- Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
- Shredder condition
- Payment condition
- Probability of getting caught condition
- Distance of payment condition
- Presence of a cheater condition
- Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form
- Implications
Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1
- Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas.
- Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
- Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: nativists, empiricists, rationalists
- Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences.
- Kohlberg's "Heinz story,"
- Turiel: kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions"
- Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches).
- Point of harmless taboo violations: pit intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Showed that Schweder was right. The morality/convention distinction was culturally variable.
January 14
- Small Group Discussion: factors affecting breaks with situational control.
Cooper, Chapter 5: Cognitive and Moral Development
- Review of Piaget's stage of cognitive development:
- Sensorimotor, Symbolic, Concrete, Formal
- Critics: missing variability from rich vs. poor environments. (Vygotsky)
- Importance of Formal Operational level for "breaking" with situational control.
- Kohlberg's stage of moral development
- Preconventional, Conventional, Postconventional
- Application to My Lai massacre
January 15
Singer, Chapter 1, "About Ethics," from Practical Ethics
- Ethics and religion
- Ethics and relativism -- different versions of relativism:
- Ethics varies by culture: true and false, same act under different conditions may have different value. Examples?
- Marxist relativism and non-relativism
- Problems for relativists: consistency across time, polls could determine ethics
- Problems for the subjectivist: making sense of disagreement
- Singer: Ok to say the values aren't objective like physics, but not sensible to deny the meaningfulness of moral disagreement. Ethical reasoning.
- Singer's view (one of several major positions): p. 10
- The sorts of reasons that count as ethical: universalizable ones.
- "Interests" in utilitarian thought
January 17
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book 1
- Politics as the master science: it's end, happiness
- Defects of the life of pleasure, honor, even virtue as the meaning of happiness. Defect of money-making.
- Section 7: argument for happiness as the final end of life.
- But what is it? Search for the function of man to find the answer.
- Nutrition and growth?
- Perception?
- Activity of the soul in accordance with virtue?
- Other characteristics needed: complete life, active life.
- Section 13: Aristotle's tripartite division of the soul:
- Rational
- Apetitive (desiring) (partly rational)
- Vegetative
January 21
Haidt, Chapter 2, "The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail"
- Philosophy's "rationalist delusion"
- 30: Plato, Hume, and Jefferson
- moralism (Anti-nativism): reactions against bad nativism, like Social Darwinism, 60s ideology suggesting that we can liberate ourselves from our biology and traditional morality (as contraception appeared to).
- Nativism (natural selection gives us minds "preloaded" with moral emotions) in the 90s: Wilson, de Waal, Damasio
- Evolutionary Psychology in moral psychology
- Roach-juice
- Soul selling
- Harmless Taboo violations: Incest story; Cadaver nibbling; compare to Kohlberg's Heinz stories (reasoning vs. confounding) -- evidence that the elephant is talking.
- Ev. psych. research outside moral psychology
- Wasson card selection test: seeing that vs. seeing why
- Rider and Elephant
- Important to see Elephant as making judgements (processing info), not just "feeling"
- 45: Elephant and Rider defined
- Social Intuitionist Model
January 22
Haidt, Chapter Three, "Elephants Rule"
- Personal Anecdote: your inner lawyer
- Priming studies:
- "take" "often" -- working with neutral stories also
- Research supporting "intuitions come first"
- Zajonc on "affective primacy"-- applies to made up language
- Social and Political judgements intuitive
- flashing word pairs with dissonance: "flower - happiness" vs. "hate - sunshine"
- Implicit Association Test
- flashing word pairs with political terms.
- Todorov's work extending "attractiveness" advantage to snap judgements of competence.
- Bodies guides judgements
- Fart Spray exaggerates moral judgements (!)
- Zhong: hand washing before and after moral judgements.
- Helzer and Pizarro: standing near a sanitizer strengthens conservatism.
- Psychopaths: reason but don't feel
- Babies: feel but don't reason
- helper and hinderer puppet shows
- reaching for helper puppets
- Affective reactions in the brain
- Josh Greene's fMRI studies of Trolley type problems
- When does the elephant listen to reason?
- Friends...
January 24
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, Book II
- Virtue not possessed by nature, but potential.
- Role of habit (ethos --> ethike) compare to other things we need training for.
- Section 4: Differences between virtue and the arts. Virture requires:
- Act chosen in knowledge
- Chosen by the agent
- For its own sake
- Proceeding from character.
- Virtue in the soul: passsions, faculties or states of character.
- Virtue makes its object excellent.
- Virtue as a mean that is also an excellence
- Courage as the mean between fear and foolhardiness
- Generosity (liberality)
- Temperance
- Proper pride
- Anger (?)
- Wittiness (vs. Buffoonery and Boorishness)
- Assessing Aristotle's view
January 28
Aristotle, Book III, Nichomachean Ethics
- Distinguishing the "voluntary" from the "involuntary" (chracteristics and cases)
- Acting from cumpulsion
- Acting "in ignorance" vs. "out of ignorance"
- Choice, more specific than the voluntary, distinguished from wish
- Deliberation
- Aristotle on the topic, "No man errs willingly" (cf. Plato/Socrates) - "becoming wiked"
- Courage: not just about fear. Noble ends.
- Temperance: exemptions for pleaures and activities informed by reason.
- cf. Don Giovanni -- the intemperate lover
Aristotle's methods & Philosophical Method
- Review of Philosophical Methods
- Review of specific methods in Aristotle
- What makes thought philosophical?
January 29
Haidt, Chapter 4, "Vote for Me (Here's Why)"
- Ring of Gyges
- Tetlock: accountability research
- Exploratory vs. Confirmatory thought
- Conditions promoting exploratory thought 1) knowing ahead of time that you'll be called to account; 2) not knowing what the audience thinks; 3) believing that the audience is well informed and interested in truth or accuracy.
- Leary's research on self-esteem importance
- Confirmation bias
- Wasson again -- number series
- Deann Kuhn --
- David Perkins research on reason giving
- Can I believe it? vs. Must I believe it?
- Application to political beliefs: Drew Westen's fMRI research.
- Good thinking as an emergent property.
Implications of Haidt's viewpoint for thinking about values
January 31
Rachels, Chapter 6, The Social Contract Theory
- Hobbes: morality as solution to practical problem
- Life in the state of nature: nasty, brutish and short
- Why? equal need, scarcity, equality of power, limited altruism
- Solution to the problem of self-interest: the social contract (def p. 85)
- Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner B: Smith stays silent(cooperates) | Prisoner B: Smith betrays (defects) | |
---|---|---|
Prisoner A (you) stays silent (cooperates) | Each serves 1 year | Prisoner A (you): 3 years Prisoner B: Smith: goes free |
Prisoner A (you) betrays (defects) | Prisoner A (you): goes free Prisoner B: Smith: 3 years |
Each serves 2 years |
- Pay off matrix for any outcome:
- Smith stays silent (cooperate), you betray (defects): 3, 0 (Smith's a sucker)
- Smith betrays (defects), you stay silent (cooperate): 0,3 (You're a sucker)
- Both betray (defect): 2 years each (Game theoretic outcome)
- Both (cooperate): 1 year each (Optimal outcome for combined interests/utility)
- Why should you defect no matter what Smith does?
- Analyze both possibilities for Smith
- He stays silent (cooperates)
- He betrays you (defects)