Difference between revisions of "Spring 2016 Ethics Course Lecture Notes"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→JAN 14) |
m (→JAN 19) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
==JAN 19== | ==JAN 19== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Cooper, Chapter 1, "Intro to Philosophical Ethics"=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*p. 3: definition of ethics; in terms of value conflict | ||
+ | :*some terminology, two points about the relationship between actions and justifications: | ||
+ | ::*values of actions often reflect their context in institutional and social context. | ||
+ | ::*just as there are levels of justification for any action, there are levels of justification for any theory of ethics. | ||
+ | :*Zimbardo; implications for ethics | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*opening story | ||
+ | :*Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors. metaphors. | ||
+ | :*Mind vs. Body | ||
+ | :*Left vs. Right | ||
+ | :*New vs. Old - importance of the frontal cortex. orbitofrontal cortex in particular. | ||
+ | :*Controlled vs. Automatic | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Failures of Self-control [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQzM8jRpoh4]] | ||
+ | :*Haidt's "disgust" stories. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Small Group Work=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*Use the Google form for small group discussion to report specific findings from the following question: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::*Within each of the four sections of Haidt's article, "The Divided Self," remind yourselves of the main claims or points, along with things you found particularly interesting. Then try to state, in one sentence, one implication of each feature of the brain for the nature of ethics. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::*Principle philosophical methods used: Speculation from new knowledge, finding entailments, finding implications. | ||
+ | |||
==JAN 21== | ==JAN 21== | ||
==JAN 26== | ==JAN 26== |
Revision as of 17:22, 19 January 2016
Return to Ethics
JAN 12
- First Day Notes:
- Websites in this course.
- Roster information -- fill in google form
- Main Assignments
- The Prep Cycle -- recommendations for success in the course!
- Starting the discussion about ethics. Course questions.
- To Do list:
- Send me a brief introduction through the "Tell Me" form on the wiki. (Soon, please.)
- Login to wiki for the first time and make a brief introduction on the practice page. (3 points if done by Friday.)
- After rosters are posted, login to courses.alfino and look around. Retrieve reading for Thursday (and read it).
- Browse wiki pages.
JAN 14
- a couple of mail failures: mlancaster jgenge2
Philosophical Method
Please find time to review the wiki page Philosophical Methods. Today we'll be working with the following methods:
- Theorizing from new or established knowledge
- Identifying presuppositions
- Defining terms
- Fitting principles to cases
- Counter-examples
Ariely, Why We Lie
- Assumptions: we think honesty is an all or nothing trait.
- Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
- Shredder condition
- Payment condition
- Probability of getting caught condition
- Distance of payment condition
- Presence of a cheater condition
- Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form
- Implications: for current and possible new approaches to limit cheating.
Method: Tips on How to report study findings
- Philosophy makes use of a wide range of evidence and knowledge. In this course you will encounter alot of psychological, anthropological and and cultural studies and theories. You have to practice the way you represent studies (as opposed to theories) and how you make inferences from their conclusions.
- observational, survey, experimental
- study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given?
- what conditions were tested?
- what was the immeditate result?
- what was the significance or inference to be made from the results?
Group Work A
Use a google form to report findings from your discussion of the following prompt:
- What does the Ariely research suggest about the nature of ethics or specific presuppositions one might have about the nature of morality?
Group Work B
Use a google form to report findings from your discussion of the following prompt:
- Shifting a bit from "cheating" to "lying", Start by trying to define a lie. Try to state your definition carefully in one sentence. Then identify three reasons why lying is bad. Finally, consider cases in which it is ok not to tell the truth. Can you identify a principle that might govern these cases?
JAN 19
Cooper, Chapter 1, "Intro to Philosophical Ethics"
- p. 3: definition of ethics; in terms of value conflict
- some terminology, two points about the relationship between actions and justifications:
- values of actions often reflect their context in institutional and social context.
- just as there are levels of justification for any action, there are levels of justification for any theory of ethics.
- Zimbardo; implications for ethics
Haidt, Chapter 1,"The Divided Self"
- opening story
- Animals in Plato's metaphor for soul; contemporary metaphors. metaphors.
- Mind vs. Body
- Left vs. Right
- New vs. Old - importance of the frontal cortex. orbitofrontal cortex in particular.
- Controlled vs. Automatic
- Failures of Self-control [[1]]
- Haidt's "disgust" stories.
- Add in sociological dimension to consider values as socially
Small Group Work
- Use the Google form for small group discussion to report specific findings from the following question:
- Within each of the four sections of Haidt's article, "The Divided Self," remind yourselves of the main claims or points, along with things you found particularly interesting. Then try to state, in one sentence, one implication of each feature of the brain for the nature of ethics.
- Principle philosophical methods used: Speculation from new knowledge, finding entailments, finding implications.