Difference between revisions of "Tem"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | ==22/23 MAR== |
− | === | + | ===Sosis, "The Adaptive Value of Religion"=== |
− | :* | + | :*How do you explain aspects of religious behavior that appear to be madness? |
− | + | ::*Early anthropology. negative, Malinowski's view, couldn't explain ritual | |
− | :: | + | :*Behavior ecology of religion: typical question: Why does particular behaviors persist in a human population? |
− | ::* | + | ::*"Optimal foraging theory" suggests we optimize our energy exchanges with an environment (in food sourcing for example). Likewise, maybe other behaviors.... |
− | ::* | + | ::*Related hard to explain behavior in nature: Stotting behavior |
− | :* | + | :*What are religious rituals? |
+ | ::*rituals are a form of communication of commitment to both in group and out group members. 168 | ||
+ | ::*"costly signal theory" (Zahavi, explaining odd behaviors like stotting and rattling, warning signals) | ||
+ | ::*study of relationship between costly requirements and longevity of communes in 19thc US. | ||
+ | ::*higher commitment in a group is related to realizing group goals. Applied to religion. . . | ||
+ | ::*It's possible that a religion will fail by not imposing costly requirements. note on Vatican II p. 170. | ||
+ | ::*religious vs. secular kibbutzim | ||
− | :* | + | :*Shekel game research |
− | ::* | + | ::*game and results |
− | ::* | + | ::*gender diffs: note that wisdom cultures do not necessarily make similar opportunities available to all genders. implications? |
− | : | ||
− | :* | + | :*"Dark side" of promoting cooperation by promoting costly commitments |
+ | ::*[some of the commitments are problematic for some members of the community] | ||
+ | ::*may promote inter-group conflict | ||
− | : | + | ===Wilson, David Sloan. "Chapter 4: The Secular Utility of Religion: historical examples"=== |
− | : | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | :*Some background on this Wilson: group selection advocate | |
+ | :*Theoretical claim: The demise of group selection theories keeps us from seeing the secular utility of religion in a way similar to Darwin's inability to see evidence for glaciers in absence of theory of glaciation. | ||
− | * | + | :*Example 1: Water Temple System in Bali |
+ | ::*water religion and irrigation; the "subak" 127, egalitarian as hunter/gathers often are, but the water system involves hierarchy. problem of management of a common good. tragedy of the commons... note that the agricultural system was separate from politics. rare. | ||
+ | ::*religious figures "Jero Gde" function also as ag extention agents. | ||
+ | ::*system requirements, p. 127-8. justice issues as well as practical problems. | ||
+ | ::*Neither Dutch colonists nor Green improved on Balinese water system. Lansing simluation to show efficiency of model. 130 | ||
− | :* | + | :*Example 2: Judaism |
− | :* | + | ::*recalls his speculative theses that golden rule and 10 commandments are almost certainly adaptive for groups. |
− | :* | + | ::*Key features of Judaism: injunction to multiply and two sets of rules: one for intra group interaction, the other for out group policy. |
− | :* | + | ::*conflicting advice: ethics of host; ethics of warrior. |
− | :* | + | ::*assessment: in group / out group morality is hypocritical relative to our current ideals, but we need to look at it to see the mechanisms of selection at work among groups and cultures. |
− | :* | + | ::*isolation mechanisms within Judaism: 136-7. Including gene-culture effects from cultural selection. |
− | + | ::*this example suggests that cultural isolation mechanisms of religion might be part of the mechanism for group effectiveness. (such as endogamy, required conversion) | |
+ | ::*note at 138: very concerned not to play into anti-Semitic criticism of Jews. Groups really do compete in different ways. | ||
+ | ::*literary example, Isaac Singer: image of cultural disgust. | ||
− | :* | + | :*Example 3: Early Christianity |
− | ::* | + | ::*Stark's population theory of Christianity: at 40% per decade, on the high end of the range (like periods in contemporary Mormonism). |
− | + | ::*Basic theory, p. 148: Early Christianity became attractive to Jews and Gentiles because it offered continuity with Judaism and reformed rules that made inter-ethnic religion possible. Empirical evidence that growth of early Christianity was more influenced by Judaism than Roman culture. 149: growth of christianity correlates with jewish influence, negatively with Roman. | |
− | + | ::*Christianity offered a competitive alternative to the social disorganization of life in many Roman cities, such as Antioch. cultural practices like high female infanticide; high ratio of males, cultural values about status and lineage; all cited as dysfunctional at this time and opposed by early Christians. | |
− | + | ::*Functioned like "cells" to isolate social networks of people willing to submit to moral rules and observances. high level of care during outbreaks of illness; differential survival. quote at 154 and 155 (mentioin perputua and felicitas) | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | :* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | : | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 23:43, 22 March 2016
22/23 MAR
Sosis, "The Adaptive Value of Religion"
- How do you explain aspects of religious behavior that appear to be madness?
- Early anthropology. negative, Malinowski's view, couldn't explain ritual
- Behavior ecology of religion: typical question: Why does particular behaviors persist in a human population?
- "Optimal foraging theory" suggests we optimize our energy exchanges with an environment (in food sourcing for example). Likewise, maybe other behaviors....
- Related hard to explain behavior in nature: Stotting behavior
- What are religious rituals?
- rituals are a form of communication of commitment to both in group and out group members. 168
- "costly signal theory" (Zahavi, explaining odd behaviors like stotting and rattling, warning signals)
- study of relationship between costly requirements and longevity of communes in 19thc US.
- higher commitment in a group is related to realizing group goals. Applied to religion. . .
- It's possible that a religion will fail by not imposing costly requirements. note on Vatican II p. 170.
- religious vs. secular kibbutzim
- Shekel game research
- game and results
- gender diffs: note that wisdom cultures do not necessarily make similar opportunities available to all genders. implications?
- "Dark side" of promoting cooperation by promoting costly commitments
- [some of the commitments are problematic for some members of the community]
- may promote inter-group conflict
Wilson, David Sloan. "Chapter 4: The Secular Utility of Religion: historical examples"
- Some background on this Wilson: group selection advocate
- Theoretical claim: The demise of group selection theories keeps us from seeing the secular utility of religion in a way similar to Darwin's inability to see evidence for glaciers in absence of theory of glaciation.
- Example 1: Water Temple System in Bali
- water religion and irrigation; the "subak" 127, egalitarian as hunter/gathers often are, but the water system involves hierarchy. problem of management of a common good. tragedy of the commons... note that the agricultural system was separate from politics. rare.
- religious figures "Jero Gde" function also as ag extention agents.
- system requirements, p. 127-8. justice issues as well as practical problems.
- Neither Dutch colonists nor Green improved on Balinese water system. Lansing simluation to show efficiency of model. 130
- Example 2: Judaism
- recalls his speculative theses that golden rule and 10 commandments are almost certainly adaptive for groups.
- Key features of Judaism: injunction to multiply and two sets of rules: one for intra group interaction, the other for out group policy.
- conflicting advice: ethics of host; ethics of warrior.
- assessment: in group / out group morality is hypocritical relative to our current ideals, but we need to look at it to see the mechanisms of selection at work among groups and cultures.
- isolation mechanisms within Judaism: 136-7. Including gene-culture effects from cultural selection.
- this example suggests that cultural isolation mechanisms of religion might be part of the mechanism for group effectiveness. (such as endogamy, required conversion)
- note at 138: very concerned not to play into anti-Semitic criticism of Jews. Groups really do compete in different ways.
- literary example, Isaac Singer: image of cultural disgust.
- Example 3: Early Christianity
- Stark's population theory of Christianity: at 40% per decade, on the high end of the range (like periods in contemporary Mormonism).
- Basic theory, p. 148: Early Christianity became attractive to Jews and Gentiles because it offered continuity with Judaism and reformed rules that made inter-ethnic religion possible. Empirical evidence that growth of early Christianity was more influenced by Judaism than Roman culture. 149: growth of christianity correlates with jewish influence, negatively with Roman.
- Christianity offered a competitive alternative to the social disorganization of life in many Roman cities, such as Antioch. cultural practices like high female infanticide; high ratio of males, cultural values about status and lineage; all cited as dysfunctional at this time and opposed by early Christians.
- Functioned like "cells" to isolate social networks of people willing to submit to moral rules and observances. high level of care during outbreaks of illness; differential survival. quote at 154 and 155 (mentioin perputua and felicitas)