Difference between revisions of "DEC 8"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==28: DEC 8== ===Reviewing Research=== :*'''1. Groups''' and research on promotion of civil discourse. :*Lots of groups focused on specific issues, like bias, civics curric...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
==28: DEC 8==
+
==26: DEC 8==
  
===Reviewing Research===
+
===Assigned===
  
:*'''1. Groups''' and research on promotion of civil discourse.
+
:*Gilbert, C8, “Paradise Glossed” (21)
 +
:*Gilbert, C9, “Immune to Reality” (23)
  
:*Lots of groups focused on specific issues, like bias, civics curriculum, campaign finance reform, bipartisan think tanks and issue based efforts. 
+
===Gilbert, Chapter 8: Paradise Glossed===
  
:*A couple that focus specifically polarization and civil discourse
+
:*Opening examples of people "re-narrating" horrible events in their lives, including wrongdoing and public humiliation.  Asymmetry between people's estimates of misfortune (loss of ability) and estimates of people in those situations.
  
::*[https://https://americanpublicsquare.org/ American Public Square]
+
:*"If negative events don't hit us as hard as we expect them to, then why do we expect them to?" Interested in discrepancy between cs forecast and actual experience.  
  
::*[https://bringit2thetable.org/ Bring it to the Table] — looks very interestingA Documentary associated with it.   
+
:*Suggests that the process of creating and attending to meanings is crucial (154-155). Evidence from examples of mind actively interpreting/seeing stimuli through mental structures like the “letterbox” (The Cat). Or Necker cube'''We respond, in part, to our own representations of reality.''' (Recall the Truck cubby hole perspective taking experiment)
  
::*[https://civilpolitics.org Civil Politics] - a group that Jonathan Haidt and Ravi Iyer at NYUDrill down on "two recommendations".  
+
:*Definers and self-rating study (159). importance of relative complexity of experience (over visual illusions). '''Complexity creates ambiguity which we exploit with narrative'''  Kale and ice cream study, 159Our immediate experience can change our relative perceptions of arrays of other objects and experiences.
  
::*[https://kitchentable.org Kitchen Table Democracy] -  
+
:*major thesis on 160.  Once our experience becomes actual, our uncs goes to work renarrating the story with positive bias.  a kind of "psychological immune system"  (psychological investment system).  (recall the poster study.)  Interesting practical advice follows: You might be able to choose a more or less positive way of looking at situations that have ambiguous interpretations. '''You are trying to strike a balance between disabling self-criticism and panglossian self-delusion'''.see 162. 
  
:*Fostering Civil Discourse: How Do We Talk About Issues That Matter? This journal, published by Facing History and Ourselves, was very fascinating in regards to the authors opinions on how individuals can foster civil discourse and be equipped for these types of conversations. I thought that the idea mentioned in this article that these types of conversations are not difficult and society labels them but are just unpracticed. Lastly, I enjoyed that this journal talked about the importance of first examining our own beliefs and understanding that we do not have a neutral lens and must take ownership of our beliefs and ideas. https://www.facinghistory.org/sites/default/files/publications/Fostering_Civil_Discourse_2020_0.pdf
+
:*We Cook the Facts (164): The mind needs some like a fact for belief, (but facts are not always readily available), so... it cooks the evidence.  IQ test takers selection of article on IQ bias.  By selecting sampling (attending to ads for the cars we bought), by conversational practices (not, "Am I the best lover..., but ....").  
  
:*The Enemy's Gaze We talked a little bit earlier in the course about how trying to put yourself in someone else's shoes can be very helpful in understanding and humanizes people with opposing views. This article discusses a study that proves this. Using virtual reality that put participants in the environment/situation of a person with opposing political beliefs, softened their hostility toward that opposing group even months after the VR experiment was over. I found it interesting because it shows that even something as simple as VR technology can improve the heated political climate we're in now. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=14&sid=953e1de9-8629-4052-a6af-cfa6a9331f6c%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=138560269&db=a9h
+
:*Evidence that we cook the facts comes from situations in which there are symmetrical and predictable inconsistencies in a group's interpretation (sports fans 168), or studies that show that we select evidence that fits our views (169). (This is also the evidence that is moving some faculty to blind grading!)
  
 +
===Gilbert, Chapter 9: Immune to Reality (Openness to Investment in Reality)===
  
 +
:*Clever Hans
  
:*'''2. Politics and voting''' - Lots of good research articles on how and why the US is polarized.   
+
:*Confabulation:  People  are unaware of many influences on them, but when asked will create a story or reason that provides a plausible explanation other than the actual influencePriming studies.  Negative words flashed on screen produces more negative judgments. (note about being "strangers to ourselves" -- connects with Leary, Curse of Self)
  
:*What are the Solutions to Political Polarization? This article did a great job of first identifying what causes political polarization and how to solve the problems it creates. While describing what drives political polarization, the article points out that the moral values involved in policies is a key reason, while stating that the free-will vs determinism argument is one of the values that is debated. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/what_are_the_solutions_to_political_polarization
+
:*(Thesis is that we also do this (exp uncs priming and confabulation) at the narrative level as well.)
  
:*A Case for Proportional Voting This article is written from the perspective of a conservative that believes the Republican Party doesn't adequately represent conservative values anymore. He's calling for proportional or preferential voting, in which voters can either rank candidates in order of preference or create nonpartisan primaries in which the top two finishers are nominated for the general election, irregardless of their party. It's his belief that this would create a more representative government. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-case-for-proportional-voting
+
:*thesis on 174:  not only do we cook the facts, but we need to consume them in a way that doesn't reveal the fabrication or alteration. (One way that we become "strangers to ourselves" is that we need to conceal the fact that we're cooking the facts.)
  
:*Why Are There Political Parties? This article breakdown where political parties came from and why we have them. I enjoy that this article addresses ways that the democratic and republican party are similar. The article also talks about how people also will vote based on their views of particular issues rather than their political party affiliation. https://wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-are-there-political-parties
+
:*Looking forward/backward (recall examples from 153, in which we over-predict the effect of negative events):  asymmetry in judgments of events when looked at '''prospectively and retrospectively'''. Thesis: We assume that the views looking forward and backward are symmetrical, but they are not. You won't value things the same way once events transpire, but the process of revaluation is largely hidden from us.  
  
:*Eight Ways Ranked Choice Voting Can Improve Voting and Elections This article contained a list of reasons as to why ranked choice voting would improve our political process and decrease political polarization. I personally am an advocate for ranked choice voting and this contained some ideas that I had never encountered before that help to support the position. https://campaignlegal.org/update/eight-ways-ranked-choice-voting-can-improve-voting-and-elections
+
:*Judge/Jury Rejection study:  prospectively we aren't aware that we'll more easily write off the judge's decision than the jury's. (176) -- ''key issue: if the explanation for the result is so obvious, why can't the test subjects anticipate it?''
 +
:*great example of confabulation too. (Basically, we don't realize the jury decision threatens the immune system more.)
  
 +
:*Regret:  when we blame ourselves for outcomes we might have anticipated.  A kind of "personal liability" emotion.  Sometimes useful.  Problem of the number of things you didn't do.  (research on p. 179: suggesting that we regret omissions more than commissions, though we predict that we'll regret commissions more.)  Why is this?  Gilbert's thesis: It's harder for the immune system to re-narrate an event that didn't happen.
  
:*'''3. Communications theory and approaches to conflict'''
+
:*Psychological Immune System:  Very bad things trigger it more than slightly bad things.  "it is sometimes more difficult to achieve a positive view of a ''bad'' experience than a ''very bad'' experience.  Concept of "psychological investment" in initiation rites study (181).  Triggers at work in the negative feedback study (182).
  
::*[https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/four-negotiation-strategies-for-resolving-values-based-disputes/ Four Negotiation strategies for resolving values based disputes]
+
:*Claims that we experience "sunk costs" in relationships.  Trade offs between changing our experience and changing our view of our experience.  Photo selection satisfaction study involving "escape" and "no escape" conditions p 184. Subjects in the escape condition were less satisfied with their choices. Yet test subjects asked which they would prefer say that want the escape option. (notice prospection/retrospection asymmetry)
  
::*Sample of type of discussion in reconcilation program research [https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL2191408&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
:*Speculative Theory about how we use explanations: "Explanations allow us to make full use of our experiences, but they also change the natures of those experiences."  186. beneficial effect of writing about trauma,  simulated student study involving identified vs. unidentified admirers. 187.  Happiness buzz lasts longer on unidentified (power of unexplained) .  (Interesting implication for seeking "love from the world".)  Suggested as support for theory. Unexplained events have bigger impact.  Other studies suggest explanations can get in the way of emotional impact.  Point: We respond to unexplained and mysterious events with higher interest and affect, even attributing great significance to them, but we also relentlessly try to explain things, thus diminishing their emotional impact. Example of research with Smile Society cards. Details may have detracted from positive impact. (Again, people think the card with the explanation will have higher impact.)  "The price we pay for our irrepressible explanatory urge is that we often spoil our most pleasant experiences by making good sense of them." 191
]
 
  
:*How to Deal With 'Values Conflict' by Russ Harris This resource provides ways to with value conflicts. First part of this article is discussing the difference between values, life domains and goals which often get confused with values. I especially like how part two and three give steps to dictating what the value conflicts are and ways to deal with the dilemma at hand. https://www.actmindfully.com.au/upimages/How_to_deal_with_values_conflicts_-_Russ_Harris.pdf
+
===Some concluding ideas about Happiness and Wisdom===
  
 +
:*1. Happiness “evolves,” but evolution isn’t about happiness. 
  
:*How Should Leaders Address Workplace Values Conflicts? This article talks about different conflicts that could occur in the workplace and how leaders should resolve these issues. One major issue that is common among the workplace is the use of new technology vs traditional ways. The article finishes off by saying "doing nothing is not an option" then talks about how leaders need to deal with conflicts with values. https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2017/05/09/leaders-address-workplace-values-conflicts/
+
:*2. The bite of reality is lessen by understanding necessity and by our own psychological “tool kits.” 
  
:*Embodied conflict: The neural basis of conflict and communication. This source explains the concepts of conflict and communication in terms of neural structures and reactions in the brain. This is interesting because it takes on a scientific view rather than a social one https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-42563-000&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
:*3. The future is a problem.
  
:*Conflict Management: Difficult Conversations with Difficult People This research shows conflict management strategies that have been proven to reduce conflict in the workplace, classes, etc. Training in conflict management increases teamwork, productivity and efficiency. A list of steps are given... for example, step 1 is to determine whether the conflict is even worth addressing. Most often, it is not. Step 2, analyze your own position. Gather all the information you can about your position and understand arguments against it before you engage in an argument. Steps go on and on, but I think workplaces should consider training their employees in this area. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835442/
+
:*4. We often miss opportunities for happiness, but then, it’s a moving target.
  
:*Active Non-violence as Conflict Resolution This article covers two non-violent ways of conflict resolution, one being individual nonviolent communication and the other being passive resistance. It then relates the two in an attempt to find a solution to successfully resolving conflict. I like that the article is making a point of nonviolence and is analyzing past events rather than  just theories. https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL2166571&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
:*5. Wisdom is a real capacity that we can cultivate through both cognitive and affective skills.
 
 
:*'''Miscellaneous / Unclassified'''
 
 
 
:*The partisan brain: cognitive study suggests people on the left and right are more similar than they think This resource discusses cognitive rigidity and whether or not it is possible to combat this in a partisan brain. I liked this article because it addressed the idea of mental flexibility and its potential to help people switch between different styles of thinking. It's interesting to think that psychological exercises could help to prevent such an extremist society and change the partisan attitude that have become so socially acceptable. https://theconversation.com/the-partisan-brain-cognitive-study-suggests-people-on-the-left-and-right-are-more-similar-than-they-think-123578
 

Revision as of 22:26, 8 December 2021

26: DEC 8

Assigned

  • Gilbert, C8, “Paradise Glossed” (21)
  • Gilbert, C9, “Immune to Reality” (23)

Gilbert, Chapter 8: Paradise Glossed

  • Opening examples of people "re-narrating" horrible events in their lives, including wrongdoing and public humiliation. Asymmetry between people's estimates of misfortune (loss of ability) and estimates of people in those situations.
  • "If negative events don't hit us as hard as we expect them to, then why do we expect them to?" Interested in discrepancy between cs forecast and actual experience.
  • Suggests that the process of creating and attending to meanings is crucial (154-155). Evidence from examples of mind actively interpreting/seeing stimuli through mental structures like the “letterbox” (The Cat). Or Necker cube. We respond, in part, to our own representations of reality. (Recall the Truck cubby hole perspective taking experiment)
  • Definers and self-rating study (159). importance of relative complexity of experience (over visual illusions). Complexity creates ambiguity which we exploit with narrative Kale and ice cream study, 159. Our immediate experience can change our relative perceptions of arrays of other objects and experiences.
  • major thesis on 160. Once our experience becomes actual, our uncs goes to work renarrating the story with positive bias. a kind of "psychological immune system" (psychological investment system). (recall the poster study.) Interesting practical advice follows: You might be able to choose a more or less positive way of looking at situations that have ambiguous interpretations. You are trying to strike a balance between disabling self-criticism and panglossian self-delusion.see 162.
  • We Cook the Facts (164): The mind needs some like a fact for belief, (but facts are not always readily available), so... it cooks the evidence. IQ test takers selection of article on IQ bias. By selecting sampling (attending to ads for the cars we bought), by conversational practices (not, "Am I the best lover..., but ....").
  • Evidence that we cook the facts comes from situations in which there are symmetrical and predictable inconsistencies in a group's interpretation (sports fans 168), or studies that show that we select evidence that fits our views (169). (This is also the evidence that is moving some faculty to blind grading!)

Gilbert, Chapter 9: Immune to Reality (Openness to Investment in Reality)

  • Clever Hans
  • Confabulation: People are unaware of many influences on them, but when asked will create a story or reason that provides a plausible explanation other than the actual influence. Priming studies. Negative words flashed on screen produces more negative judgments. (note about being "strangers to ourselves" -- connects with Leary, Curse of Self)
  • (Thesis is that we also do this (exp uncs priming and confabulation) at the narrative level as well.)
  • thesis on 174: not only do we cook the facts, but we need to consume them in a way that doesn't reveal the fabrication or alteration. (One way that we become "strangers to ourselves" is that we need to conceal the fact that we're cooking the facts.)
  • Looking forward/backward (recall examples from 153, in which we over-predict the effect of negative events): asymmetry in judgments of events when looked at prospectively and retrospectively. Thesis: We assume that the views looking forward and backward are symmetrical, but they are not. You won't value things the same way once events transpire, but the process of revaluation is largely hidden from us.
  • Judge/Jury Rejection study: prospectively we aren't aware that we'll more easily write off the judge's decision than the jury's. (176) -- key issue: if the explanation for the result is so obvious, why can't the test subjects anticipate it?
  • great example of confabulation too. (Basically, we don't realize the jury decision threatens the immune system more.)
  • Regret: when we blame ourselves for outcomes we might have anticipated. A kind of "personal liability" emotion. Sometimes useful. Problem of the number of things you didn't do. (research on p. 179: suggesting that we regret omissions more than commissions, though we predict that we'll regret commissions more.) Why is this? Gilbert's thesis: It's harder for the immune system to re-narrate an event that didn't happen.
  • Psychological Immune System: Very bad things trigger it more than slightly bad things. "it is sometimes more difficult to achieve a positive view of a bad experience than a very bad experience. Concept of "psychological investment" in initiation rites study (181). Triggers at work in the negative feedback study (182).
  • Claims that we experience "sunk costs" in relationships. Trade offs between changing our experience and changing our view of our experience. Photo selection satisfaction study involving "escape" and "no escape" conditions p 184. Subjects in the escape condition were less satisfied with their choices. Yet test subjects asked which they would prefer say that want the escape option. (notice prospection/retrospection asymmetry)
  • Speculative Theory about how we use explanations: "Explanations allow us to make full use of our experiences, but they also change the natures of those experiences." 186. beneficial effect of writing about trauma, simulated student study involving identified vs. unidentified admirers. 187. Happiness buzz lasts longer on unidentified (power of unexplained) . (Interesting implication for seeking "love from the world".) Suggested as support for theory. Unexplained events have bigger impact. Other studies suggest explanations can get in the way of emotional impact. Point: We respond to unexplained and mysterious events with higher interest and affect, even attributing great significance to them, but we also relentlessly try to explain things, thus diminishing their emotional impact. Example of research with Smile Society cards. Details may have detracted from positive impact. (Again, people think the card with the explanation will have higher impact.) "The price we pay for our irrepressible explanatory urge is that we often spoil our most pleasant experiences by making good sense of them." 191

Some concluding ideas about Happiness and Wisdom

  • 1. Happiness “evolves,” but evolution isn’t about happiness.
  • 2. The bite of reality is lessen by understanding necessity and by our own psychological “tool kits.”
  • 3. The future is a problem.
  • 4. We often miss opportunities for happiness, but then, it’s a moving target.
  • 5. Wisdom is a real capacity that we can cultivate through both cognitive and affective skills.