Difference between revisions of "JAN 24"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==2: JAN 24. Unit One: An Interdisciplinary Theory of Morality==
+
==3. JAN 24==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*Ariely, Why We Lie (6)
+
:*Sonnenbergs, C 5, "Trillions of Mouths to Feed" (111-136) (25)
:*Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1 (24)
 
:*Zimbardo Experiment -- view one of the youtube videos about the experiment.  read the wiki page.
 
:*1st Dropbox Assignment assigned, not due today
 
  
===Method: Reporting Findings from Social Science research===
+
===In-class===
  
:*Brief glance at [[Philosophical Methods]]
+
:*Review of food biographies
 +
:*The N, S, P model
  
:*Tips on How to report study findings
+
===The NSP Model for Dietary Change: Comparing notes on variety expectations===
  
:*Philosophy makes use of a wide range of evidence and knowledge.  In this course you will encounter alot of psychological, anthropological and cultural studies.  You have to practice the way you represent studies (as opposed to theories) and how you make inferences from their conclusions.
+
:*Today we will start discussing how the NSP model helps us think about dietary change.
  
:*Some key elements to distinguish in reporting research:
+
:*[[Nutrition, Satisfaction, Practicality and Dietary Change]]
::*observational, survey, experimental
 
::*study setup: for observational: who were the test subjects, what were they asked to do; for survey: what instrument was used, to whom was it given?
 
::*what conditions were tested?
 
::*what was the immediate result?
 
::*what was the significance or inference to be made from the results?
 
  
===Ariely, Why We Lie===
+
:*General “false practicality” point:  How practical is the drive-through fast food option?  How much time does it take?  How does it makes you feel while eating, after eating?  Do you notice blood sugar spikes from ff?  How long until you feel hunger again?
  
:*Assumptions: we think honesty is an all or nothing trait.
+
:*Small group exercise. Today we’ll focus on some “Satisfaction-Practicality” connections relevant to designing / re-designing your diet. Specifically, consider these questions as you head into small group discussion to hear others’ approaches and thinking.
:*Research on honesty with the "matrix task"
 
::*Shredder condition
 
::*Payment condition
 
::*Probability of getting caught condition
 
::*Distance of payment condition
 
::*Presence of a cheater condition
 
:*Priming with 10 commandments or signature on top of form
 
:*Implications: for current and possible new approaches to limit cheating.  
 
:*Philosophical Implications: What, if anything, does this tell us about the nature of ethics?
 
  
===Debrief on Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Experiment===
+
::*Is there any “false practicality” in your diet?  Place where you tell yourself something is practical, but maybe only because you aren’t solve the problem another way.
  
:*Let's practice our protocol for reporting research here. 
+
::*How much variety do you expect from breakfast, lunch, and dinner?  
:*What are the principle insights from this experiment?  How might they relate to recent events?
 
  
===Everyday Ethics: When do you have to tell the truth?===
+
::*How many different dinners would you need in your repertoire to feel like you had plenty of good choices?
  
:*Do you have to tell the truth to everyone? Are there situations in which you are morally obligated to withhold the truth, “dissemble,” or even to lie?  
+
::*Types of variety:
 +
:::*I want to come home knowing that I can choose from X different dinners depending on mood and conditions.  (Home menu model)
 +
:::*I want my shopping to give me X dinners to choose from.  It’s ok if variety decreases as the week goes by. (Variety Shopping model)
 +
:::*I’m ok scheduling each dinner by the days of the week. (Days of week meal planning.)
  
:*Consider cases:
+
::*Other variety considerations:
::*Someone asks you an inappropriate question.
+
:::*I don’t want to repeat meals much within a week.
::*Someone asks you for information that is private.
+
:::*I’m fine eating the same thing for 2-3 nights or alternating 2 dinners over 4 days.
::*The truth would cause extraordinary harm.
 
  
:*Over the weekend, ask 2-3 people about their views and rules about truth tellingTry some of our questions and cases or just engage the conversation on its own termsTry to figure out how people are thinking about the question.
+
::*Other sources of variety
 +
:::*Seasonal rotations
 +
:::*Make shift dinners(I can sometimes just make a salad and side veg for dinner.) Note the nutrition/practicality issues hereEasy to do and very practical if you are on top of your nutrition.
  
:*The Philosophy Lesson in this exercise:
+
===Sonnenbergs, C 5, "Trillions of Mouths to Feed"===
::*This mostly an introductory exercise that gets you talking to each other and produces some writing for us to look at.  It’s also a way to familiarize you with the dropbox and anonymous submission.  But there is a philosophy lesson here.
 
::*Philosophy involves developing basic theories about things. In this case, the basic question is: Why do human value truth in the complicated way that they do?  What would a “theory of truth telling” look like?
 
  
===1st Writing and Dropbox practice===
+
:'''Microbiota extinction'''
 +
::*Not just from change in foods, fewer fermented foods, more sterile food and sterile environments. 
 +
::*To improve gut diversity, eat fermented foods, foods with active cultures, and fiber. whole grains and rice. Don't sterilize your home environment.  Pets and gardens help with our microbiota. (Elsewhere, food provokes an immune response.  That's a good thing.)  Variety is important. Different MB species like different things. 
 +
::*Introduces acronym: MAC -- microbiota accessible carbs -- these are really complex carbs. 
  
:*Please write a 250 word maximum answer to the following question by '''January 27, 11:59pm.'''  This assignment will give us some initial writing to look at and give you practice with the dropbox protocol for turning in pseudonymous writing in the course. For this assignment, the writing itself is ungraded, but you will receive 15 points for following the instructions accurately.
+
:'''Our Microbiota: Recyclers'''
 +
::*Microbiota mechanisms: You are what you eat. You are what your microbiota eats and metabolizes.
 +
::*Nice metaphor of intestines to waste management.  Note diffs bt small intestine and large in function.
 +
::*Life is hard for our M germs: no oxygen down there (must use anerobic processes, unlike our cells) and transit time is fast (hopefully!).  So they make short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that can metabolize in the blood stream where there is oxygen. You do get some calories from them once they are in an aerobic environment.  But they are more important for us now (given that we don't have food insecurity) for their pharmacological and metabolic functions.  (A reason why the "N" in NSP, should be an "H" for health.)
 +
::*Why feed the gut?  Isn't that just more calories? (116) - No. people with high SCFA diets lose weight (Why? Satiety), decrease inflammation, less Western diet disease. Back to the connection between satiety and nutritional health. (N - S - P).  For S, think of mouth satisfaction, stomach satisfaction, and gut satisfaction.
  
::*'''Topic:''' Is it morally acceptable to gossip?  If so, under what conditions? Does gossip serve a legitimate purpose?  If so, what is it?
+
::*Sig. claim: 117: "Providing more dietary fiber for MB fermentation would likely result in weight loss, lower inflammation, decreased Weatern diseases..."
 
::*'''Prompt Advice''':  Try to make your position clear (the "what") and the reasons clear (the "why").  Good arguments also try to respond to objections and consider the most reasonable opposing views.  Your position is likely to be stronger if it is qualified in various ways. I strongly encourage you to draft your answer the night before it is due and return to it on the night that it is due.
 
  
:*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate.  I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''.  Collaboration  is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class.  The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer.  Keep it verbal.  Generate your own examples. 
+
:'''History of research on fiber'''
  
::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]].
+
::*Field doctors:  Thomas Cleave, 70s "The Saccharine Disease" "Bran Man" - his theory met with skepticism in medical community; Denis Burkitt (and Hugh Trowell) studied Westerners and Africans on fiber, stool quality, and health. 5x fiber, 2x transit.   Overconsumption of refined carbs. (S&S mention here that public health attention didn't stay on refined Carbs. fear of fat, elsewhere "lipidphobia" took more attention.)  "If you pass small stools, you have to have large hospitals."
::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.
 
::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''. You may put your student ID number in the file.  Always put a word count in the file. Save your file for this assignment with the name: TruthTelling.
 
::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#0 1st Writing and Dropbox practice" dropbox.  
 
::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points.
 
  
===Haidt, The Righteous Mind, Intro and Chapter 1===
+
::*Early researchers didn't have the mechanisms. Now we do, sort of.
  
*Intro
+
:'''Carbohydrates' Bad Reputation'''
:*Note: starts with problem of "getting along" -- problem of ethics is settling conflict (recall contrast with more traditional goal of finding a method or theory to discover moral truth).
+
::*Carb chemistry/metabolism basics -- 120: mono, di, poly-saccarides. also in our nutrition textbook chapters.  Starches usually break down in small intestine, alot like sugar.  
:*The "righteous" mind is at once moral and judgemental. It makes possible group cooperation, tribes, nations, and societies.
+
::*Oligosaccharides: 3-9 monosaccharides. Oligosaccharides (found in legumes, whole grains, fruits and veg. also pectin and inulin (in onions) ferment in gut).  
  
:*Majors claims of each section:
+
::*Insulin resistance. Sugars and many starches cause insulin spikes leading to resistance. Big point here.  At the level of MACs, plant chemical diversity is reflected in diversity of M. and it's products.
::*Intuitions come first, reasoning second. ''The mind is divided, like a rider on an elephant, and the rider's job is to serve the elephant.''
 
::*There's more to morality than harm and fairness
 
::*Morality binds and blinds -- We are 90 percent chimp, 10% bee.
 
  
:::*Keep notes that help you tie content back to these claims.
+
::*122: glycemic index and glycemic load.  (We'll cover this later.) show how to look up food values.  note that glycemic index isn't really an issue with most whole fruits and vegetables.  Example: pumpkin has a high glycemic index, a low load.  You want low load, high-MAC.
  
:*'''Method Note''': This is explanatory writing. Not philosophy directlyDigression on difference between explanatory and justifactory writing.
+
:'''Measuring MACs'''  
 +
::*Nitrition labels don't give you information about glycemic load or MACs  no standard measure of dietary fiber (note discrepancies from above.) 124. So author’s prefer MACs as a term since it focuses on what the MB can eat from your carbs.
 +
::*Undernourished gut bacteria can start eating the mucus lining of the gut.  (This was also in a segment of one of the gut movies.)'''Feed them or they'll eat you!'''
  
:*Moral reasoning as a means of finding truth vs. furthering social agendas. '''Paradox of Moral Experience:''' We experience our morality the first way, but when we look objectively at groups, it's more like the second way.
+
::*RDAs: 29/38 grams. Actual Americans average: 15 grams/day. (Recall our African brothers and sisters at 100+ /day!)  126: Notes that not all complex carbs are available to the MB. Take away: More MACS, more fermentation, more SCFAs.  
  
*Chapter 1
+
::*Research discovering enzyme in nori, a seaweed based sushi wrapper: found in Japanese guts. Helps digest fish.  Note: Terrior.  Local adaptation of the M.
  
:*Harmless taboo violations: eating the dog / violating a dead chicken.
+
:'''Rich and Poor MB'''
 +
::*128:  Dutch research on rich and poor M.  richness of M correlates with anti-inflammatory effects, thinness, low insulin resistance, metabolic potential for pro-carginogenic compounds.  French study interesting because it suggests that dietary change can quickly alter M diversity (richness).
 +
::*Gordon's twin study on obesity. also famous 2013 FMT mouse research:  need M and M-supporting diet, not just the bacteria.  Note caveat 129. '''Can't just benefit from the microbes alone'''. Fecal transplant with poor diet killed off beneficial bacteria.
  
:*Brief background on developmental & moral psychology: p. 5
+
:'''Refining MACs out of the diet'''.   
:::*nativists -- nature gives us capacities to distinguish right from wrong, possibly using moral emotions.
+
::*What's wrong with refined cereal seeds (130).  Wheat bread vs. Wheat berries.  '''The form of the food matters to the fiber count.''' Highly milled whole wheat flour will behave differently in your gut that rough milledMuch industrial whole wheat is very finely ground.
:::*empiricists -- we learn the difference between right and wrong from experience. tabula rasa. 
+
::*Industrial bread products '''even if they are called "whole wheat"''' must removes oils for shelf life.  
:::*rationalists -- circa '87 Piaget's alternative to nature/nurture -- there is both a natural developmental requirement and empirical requirement for understanding the world in the way we consider "rational" (folk physics, folk psychology).   
+
::*CF. whole wheat bread: 2g fiberCooked unmilled wheat berries (like my Farro/veg salad).
::*Piaget's rationalism: kids figure things out for themselves if they have normal brains and the right experiences. stages: example of conservation of volume of water (6) "self-constructed" - alt to nature/nurture7: We grow into our rationality like caterpillars into butterflies.
+
::*What about the Inuit?
 
+
::*What about excess gas? Interesting consolations.
::*Kohlberg's "Heinz story" - pre-conventional, conventional, post-conventional. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development#/media/File:Kohlberg_Model_of_Moral_Development.svg]
+
::*135: Note their dietary adviceA high MAC, non-industrial omnivorous diet.
:::*note problems, p. 9. seems to support a liberal secular world viewEgalitarianism, role playing, disinterestedness....  Is it obvious or suspicious that that's what rationalism leads to?  Haidt suspects something's been left out.
 
 
 
:::*Additional criticisms of Kohlberg (also at Haidt 9): seemed to diminish the importance of loyalty, authority, and tradition as less developed levels of moral response. Abstracts from relationships.  (Could it be that morality is independent of our concrete relationships? Not likely.)
 
 
 
::*Turiel: note different method.  Probing to find contingencies in kids' thinking about rules.  kids don't treat all moral rules the same: very young kids distinguish "harms" from "social conventions".  Harm is "first on the scene" in the dev. of our moral foundations(Note: Still following the idea that moral development is a universal, culturally neutral process.)  (Note on method: we have, in Turiel's research, a '''discovery of an unsupported assumption'''.)
 
 
 
:*Haidt's puzzle about Turiel: other dimensions of moral experience, like "purity" and "pollution" seem operative at young ages and deep in culture (witches -- how do human minds create witches in similar ways in different places?). 11-13 examples. Found answers in Schweder's work.
 
 
 
:*In what ways is the concept of the self culturally variable?
 
 
 
::*Schweder: sociocentric vs. individualistic cultures.  Interview subjects in sociocentric societies don't make the moral/conventional distinction the same way we (westerns) do.  (Schweder is "saying" to Kohlberg and Turiel: your model is culturally specific.)  For example in the comparison of moral violations between Indians from Orissa and Americans from Chicago, it is important that these groups don't make the convention/harm distinction Turiel's theory would predict.  That's a distinction individualist cultures make.  
 
 
:*Haidt's research: Wrote vignettes to ask test subjects, including Turiel's uniform / swing pushing incidentfocus on vignettes is "harmless taboo violation"  (no victim /no harm), which pits intuitions about norms and conventions against intuitions about the morality of harm. Study in three cities with two socio-economic groups.  Showed that Schweder was right.  ''The morality/convention distinction was itself culturally variable.'' 
 
::*Americans make big dist. between morality and convention.  upper-class Brazilians like Americans.  lower class groups tended to see smaller morality/convention difference. All morality. 
 
:*Turiel is right about how our culture makes the harm/convention distinction, but his theory doesn't travel well. Roughly, more sociocentric cultures put the morality(wrong even if no rule)/convention (wrong because there is a rule) marker more to the morality side.  almost no trace of social conventionalism in Orissa.
 
 
 
:*Identify, if possible, some practices and beliefs from either your personal views, your family, or your ethnic or cultural background which show a particular way of making the moral/conventional distinction(Example: For some families removing shoes at the door is right thing to do, whereas for others it is just experienced as a convention.  Would you eat a burrito in a public bathroom?  Tell story of dinner out with a vegan friend.)
 

Latest revision as of 18:05, 29 January 2024

3. JAN 24

Assigned Work

  • Sonnenbergs, C 5, "Trillions of Mouths to Feed" (111-136) (25)

In-class

  • Review of food biographies
  • The N, S, P model

The NSP Model for Dietary Change: Comparing notes on variety expectations

  • Today we will start discussing how the NSP model helps us think about dietary change.
  • General “false practicality” point: How practical is the drive-through fast food option? How much time does it take? How does it makes you feel while eating, after eating? Do you notice blood sugar spikes from ff? How long until you feel hunger again?
  • Small group exercise. Today we’ll focus on some “Satisfaction-Practicality” connections relevant to designing / re-designing your diet. Specifically, consider these questions as you head into small group discussion to hear others’ approaches and thinking.
  • Is there any “false practicality” in your diet? Place where you tell yourself something is practical, but maybe only because you aren’t solve the problem another way.
  • How much variety do you expect from breakfast, lunch, and dinner?
  • How many different dinners would you need in your repertoire to feel like you had plenty of good choices?
  • Types of variety:
  • I want to come home knowing that I can choose from X different dinners depending on mood and conditions. (Home menu model)
  • I want my shopping to give me X dinners to choose from. It’s ok if variety decreases as the week goes by. (Variety Shopping model)
  • I’m ok scheduling each dinner by the days of the week. (Days of week meal planning.)
  • Other variety considerations:
  • I don’t want to repeat meals much within a week.
  • I’m fine eating the same thing for 2-3 nights or alternating 2 dinners over 4 days.
  • Other sources of variety
  • Seasonal rotations
  • Make shift dinners. (I can sometimes just make a salad and side veg for dinner.) Note the nutrition/practicality issues here. Easy to do and very practical if you are on top of your nutrition.

Sonnenbergs, C 5, "Trillions of Mouths to Feed"

Microbiota extinction
  • Not just from change in foods, fewer fermented foods, more sterile food and sterile environments.
  • To improve gut diversity, eat fermented foods, foods with active cultures, and fiber. whole grains and rice. Don't sterilize your home environment. Pets and gardens help with our microbiota. (Elsewhere, food provokes an immune response. That's a good thing.) Variety is important. Different MB species like different things.
  • Introduces acronym: MAC -- microbiota accessible carbs -- these are really complex carbs.
Our Microbiota: Recyclers
  • Microbiota mechanisms: You are what you eat. You are what your microbiota eats and metabolizes.
  • Nice metaphor of intestines to waste management. Note diffs bt small intestine and large in function.
  • Life is hard for our M germs: no oxygen down there (must use anerobic processes, unlike our cells) and transit time is fast (hopefully!). So they make short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that can metabolize in the blood stream where there is oxygen. You do get some calories from them once they are in an aerobic environment. But they are more important for us now (given that we don't have food insecurity) for their pharmacological and metabolic functions. (A reason why the "N" in NSP, should be an "H" for health.)
  • Why feed the gut? Isn't that just more calories? (116) - No. people with high SCFA diets lose weight (Why? Satiety), decrease inflammation, less Western diet disease. Back to the connection between satiety and nutritional health. (N - S - P). For S, think of mouth satisfaction, stomach satisfaction, and gut satisfaction.
  • Sig. claim: 117: "Providing more dietary fiber for MB fermentation would likely result in weight loss, lower inflammation, decreased Weatern diseases..."
History of research on fiber
  • Field doctors: Thomas Cleave, 70s "The Saccharine Disease" "Bran Man" - his theory met with skepticism in medical community; Denis Burkitt (and Hugh Trowell) studied Westerners and Africans on fiber, stool quality, and health. 5x fiber, 2x transit. Overconsumption of refined carbs. (S&S mention here that public health attention didn't stay on refined Carbs. fear of fat, elsewhere "lipidphobia" took more attention.) "If you pass small stools, you have to have large hospitals."
  • Early researchers didn't have the mechanisms. Now we do, sort of.
Carbohydrates' Bad Reputation
  • Carb chemistry/metabolism basics -- 120: mono, di, poly-saccarides. also in our nutrition textbook chapters. Starches usually break down in small intestine, alot like sugar.
  • Oligosaccharides: 3-9 monosaccharides. Oligosaccharides (found in legumes, whole grains, fruits and veg. also pectin and inulin (in onions) ferment in gut).
  • Insulin resistance. Sugars and many starches cause insulin spikes leading to resistance. Big point here. At the level of MACs, plant chemical diversity is reflected in diversity of M. and it's products.
  • 122: glycemic index and glycemic load. (We'll cover this later.) show how to look up food values. note that glycemic index isn't really an issue with most whole fruits and vegetables. Example: pumpkin has a high glycemic index, a low load. You want low load, high-MAC.
Measuring MACs
  • Nitrition labels don't give you information about glycemic load or MACs no standard measure of dietary fiber (note discrepancies from above.) 124. So author’s prefer MACs as a term since it focuses on what the MB can eat from your carbs.
  • Undernourished gut bacteria can start eating the mucus lining of the gut. (This was also in a segment of one of the gut movies.). Feed them or they'll eat you!
  • RDAs: 29/38 grams. Actual Americans average: 15 grams/day. (Recall our African brothers and sisters at 100+ /day!) 126: Notes that not all complex carbs are available to the MB. Take away: More MACS, more fermentation, more SCFAs.
  • Research discovering enzyme in nori, a seaweed based sushi wrapper: found in Japanese guts. Helps digest fish. Note: Terrior. Local adaptation of the M.
Rich and Poor MB
  • 128: Dutch research on rich and poor M. richness of M correlates with anti-inflammatory effects, thinness, low insulin resistance, metabolic potential for pro-carginogenic compounds. French study interesting because it suggests that dietary change can quickly alter M diversity (richness).
  • Gordon's twin study on obesity. also famous 2013 FMT mouse research: need M and M-supporting diet, not just the bacteria. Note caveat 129. Can't just benefit from the microbes alone. Fecal transplant with poor diet killed off beneficial bacteria.
Refining MACs out of the diet.
  • What's wrong with refined cereal seeds (130). Wheat bread vs. Wheat berries. The form of the food matters to the fiber count. Highly milled whole wheat flour will behave differently in your gut that rough milled. Much industrial whole wheat is very finely ground.
  • Industrial bread products even if they are called "whole wheat" must removes oils for shelf life.
  • CF. whole wheat bread: 2g fiber. Cooked unmilled wheat berries (like my Farro/veg salad).
  • What about the Inuit?
  • What about excess gas? Interesting consolations.
  • 135: Note their dietary advice. A high MAC, non-industrial omnivorous diet.