Difference between revisions of "MAR 19"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==17: MAR 19 Unit Four: Justice and Justified Partiality. == ===Assigned=== :*[https://www.npr.org/2020/06/05/870352402/playing-favorites-when-kindness-toward-some-means-cal...")
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==17: MAR 19 Unit Four: Justice and Justified Partiality. ==
+
==15. MAR 19: Unit Four: Food Culture==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*[https://www.npr.org/2020/06/05/870352402/playing-favorites-when-kindness-toward-some-means-callousness-toward-others Hidden Brain, "Playing Favorites: When kindness toward some means callousness toward others"]
+
:*Lauden, Rachel, Cuisine and Empire, Introduction (1-9;8) and part of Chapter 1, "Mastering Grain Cookery" (9-42).
:*Rawls' Theory of Justice.  Watch both:
 
::*16 minute video focused on Rawls: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6k08C699zI&feature=youtu.be].
 
::*6 minute video, PBS series: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0CTHVCkm90&feature=youtu.be]
 
  
===In Class===
+
===In-class===
  
:*Is there a limit to partiality to kin?
+
:*Small group exchange on Spring Break eating and Practicum efforts
 +
:*Some lunch strategies and recipes in the spirit of Barbara Rolls and NSP
  
===Introduction to Justified Partiality Unit===
+
===Some lunch strategies and recipes in the spirit of Barbara Rolls and NSP===
  
:*A typical question for thinking about social justice is, '''"What do I owe strangers?"'''. We've mentioned the social contract, or even the constitution, as a place where this set of values (expectations) is realized, but there are some other avenues to justice that we explore in this unit.
+
:*This is just one strategy for a part of your diet, but it might appeal to some of you. It is plant-based, high fiber & protein, and consistent with NSP theory and Barbara Rolls theory of volumetrics.
  
:*Some concepts:  
+
:*My “shelf stable” foods. [https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/taa7oft7bt7rw8rcrkr8u/IMG_0334.HEIC?rlkey=2mfltetmdnq36fs5jm09yrjg6&dl=0]
::*You owe strangers a '''duty of justice''' - something they can make a claim upon you for - (Examples) or
 
::*You can also owe someone an informal or civil '''duty of interpersonal fairness/justice''' - you can't take me to court for not showing this sort of fairness or just treatment, but if you are on board with impersonal honesty, impersonal trust, and pro-sociality, you probably accept this duty at some level. (Examples)
 
  
:*You can think of our approach in this unit as an indirect way of addressing the question of these two sorts of justice duties by starting with a different question:
+
:*Lunch strategy:
 +
::*Part A: A rotation of several "protein-veg" salads that prep in about an hour and last 4 days. 
 +
::*Part B: A fruit salad that preps in about 20 minutes and last 4 days.
  
::*'''"What are the limits (if any) of partiality to family, intimates, friends?" (Your preference network)'''
+
:*Part A
::*'''Personal Partiality''' - the legitimate preferences and treatment we show to friends, family, and intimates.
+
::*[https://www.evernote.com/shard/s132/sh/a285322e-dd45-4e86-b672-d9d180fffedd/1d6d2488d6d540593d968b0e96384cd7 Best Ever Lentil Salad]
 +
::*[https://www.evernote.com/shard/s132/sh/ac0a6fe1-14af-488c-8ff9-e7ae796d0507/ba9a6b01ea56a94e7136bf305a18d798 Ceci Salad]
 +
::*[https://www.evernote.com/shard/s132/sh/ec10d0b2-ba49-45fd-84e6-47dd633815f3/2ac51dc744b9208fecdf6cb01b5539fd Farro Salad]
 +
::*[https://www.evernote.com/shard/s132/sh/bce5e2af-68bd-4b59-8688-21d6e745dea9/4b791163f25227ee0a8476f76df9b440 Orzo Salad]
  
:*Today's class is focused on "personal partiality," the kind that shows up in our interpersonal social relationships. The next class will focus on '''"impersonal altruism"''', which shows up in our commitments, if any, to benefit strangers, especially strangers in our society, but in some cases, globally.  
+
:*Part B
 +
::*[https://www.evernote.com/shard/s132/sh/7a73b6f4-62e7-42c4-a4ac-f55912bc2c99/80a7dbae406c9e0285e199d00a09aa0f Fruit Salad]
  
:*Three big questions:
+
:*Future topic: Salad theory -  
::*1. What are some the social functions of '''personal preferential treatment'''?  (Draw in material from podcast)
 
::*2. Could our networks of preferential treatment be the effect of and also promote injustice?
 
::*3. What principles or considerations might lead to you recognize a '''duty of interpersonal justice'''? (that is, should you direct some resources (time, money, in-kind aid) outside your preference network? (We need additional resources for Question #3)
 
  
===Hidden Brain, "Playing Favorites"===
 
  
:*Intro
+
====Introduction to "Cuisine and Empire"====
::*Expectations for unique attention from one's beloved. We'd rather an inferior unique message than a message shared with others.  '''We want partiality'''. (Think about cases in which someone shows you a simple preference -- offering to pay for coffee, give you a ride somewhere, just showing you attention.  It's wonderful!)
 
::*How does partiality fit with a desire for justice as equal treatment?  Can partiality cause injustice?
 
  
:*'''Segment 1: Carla's Story'''
+
:*'''Introduction''' - core idea for the book from her Hawaii book. Movements of food, technology, and technique get consolidated into cuisines that spread, often in connection with power and empire or nation stateWants to displace an older story in which high cuisine is an evolution from humble cuisine.
::*Discrimination research: IAT - Implicit Association Test - Mahzarin Banaji (Harvard) one of the researchers on IAT.
+
 
::*Mahzarin Banaji and Professor Carla Kaplan (Yale English at time of story). Also a quilter. Friends in the 80s, among the few women at YaleStory of injury to Carla.  She gets preferential treatment because she is a professor, rather than because she was a quilter. Class based.
+
:*Hypothesizes 10 global cuisines, all based on roots and grains6
::*Is it discrimination if you are given a preference? [Imagine a system of preferences given to those we know. Could such a system support systemic injustice?]  Someone decides to show you "special kindness" -- above and beyond the ordinary. Language of discrimination based on "commission".  But what about omission?  Hard to know if you didn't get preferential treatment.  Yikes!  Carla got to see both what it was like to be treated same and different.   
+
 
::*Most injustices of "omission" are invisible.
+
:*'''Chapter 1'''
+
 
::*Story by Mahzarin about interview from former student journalist from magazine the professor didn't respect.  Suddenly, the in-group information about being a Yaley was enough to trigger a preferencePreference networks in Ivy leagues schools.  But also Gonzaga!!! We actively cultivate a preferential network for you!  Because we care about you!
+
:*1,000 bc - 50 million humans, cities no larger than 10,000Cooking already for up to 2 million years. Richard Wrangham, [https://www.amazon.com/Catching-Fire-Cooking-Made-Human/dp/0465020410/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Cooked+Wrangham&qid=1602101552&sr=8-1 Catching Fire]!.  
::*"Helping those with whom you have a group identity" is a form of modern discrimination, acc to Mahzarin.
 
::*Interesting feature of favoritism -- You often don't find out that you didn't get preferential treatment.
 
::*'''Favoritism doesn't get as much attention as discrimination.'''
 
  
::*Can you avoid favoritism?  
+
:*Major change: technology to harvest food from hard seed of herbaceous plants (grains) p. 12.  Lake Kinneret site (Sea of Galilee) 19.4K ya. Only grain cultures were able to support cities.
::*Could be based on "green beard effect" same school, etc.  
 
  
:*'''Segment 2: Dillon the Altruist''' 16:00 minutes.
+
:*'''Global Culinary Geography, CA. 1000 BCE.'''  see map
::*What would it be like to try to overcome favoritism.
 
::*Story of Dillon Matthews. Tries to avoid favoritism. Middle school story. Utilitarian primer: Singer's argument about helping others in need.  Thought experiment: Saving a child from a pond ruins your suit.  Utilitarian altruism. 
 
::*''Singer's Principle'': If you can do good without giving up something of equal moral significance, you should do it. 
 
::*"Give Well" - documented charity work. (One of many sources that can assure you that your money did something good. Other examples: Jimmy Carter's mission, Gates' missions.  If you had contributed to such a cause, you would have been effective.)
 
::*Hannah’s model:  Value the person in front of you.  Then move out to others.  Courtship with Dillon involves debate over these two approaches:  Partiality justified vs not justified. Debating moral philosophy on a first date! Wow! It doesn't get any better than that. 
 
::*'''Effective altruism movement'''. The most good you can do. Evidence based altruism.  Vs. Hannah: Focused on family, friends, your neighborhood, city.  Parental lesson.  Dinner together. 
 
::*Utilitarian logic.  Equal happiness principle.  Dillon not focused on preference to people near him, but on effectiveness of altruism. (Feel the rationality, and maybe the unnaturalness of this.)
 
::*Dillon donates a kidney to a stranger.  Hmm. Not giving his kidney felt like hoarding something.  Hannah felt her beloved was taking an unnecessary risk.  "Being a stranger" made a difference to her. Audio of Dillon’s recovery. Hmm.  Dillon honored by Kidney Association. 
 
::*The Trolley Problem again, this time from Joshua Greene himself!!  Watch "The Good Place". 
 
::*What if the person you had to sacrifice was someone you loved, your child.  Dillon might do it. Dillion would do it.  "They are all the heroes of their own stories..." Dillon would sacrifice Hannah.  Hannah might sacrifice Dillion just know that's what he would want that, but no.  She wouldn't. Dillion jokes that he might kill himself after killing his child. 
 
::*Greene: She recognizes that what he would do is rational.  He's willing to override it, but he might not be able to live with himself for doing that. (Elephant and rider.)
 
  
:*'''Segment 3: Neurobiology of Preference'''. 33:15 minutes.
+
:*Cuisines of the Yellow River (18), Yangzte River (19), and barley wheat cuisines of Turkey, Mediterranean.   
::*Naturalness of preference.  Evolutionary background: Preference promotes cooperation. Suite of capacities.  A package.  Don't lie, cheat, steal...
 
::*”Morality is fundamentally about cooperation” (Greene):  Kin cooperation....Cooperation among friends... reciprocity...semi-strangers (same religion. friend of kin. friend of friend of kin.  Friends! 
 
::*Moral concentric circles.  How big is my "Us"?  What is the range of humans I care about and to what degree?
 
::*Greene's analogy of automatic and manual camera modes.  (Two systems. Automatic (elephant) and Deliberate (rider).) Difficult decisions might require '''manual mode'''. 
 
::*Manual mode: dlPFC (activated in utilitarian thought) (high cog load).  Automatic -- amygdala.  Snakes in the grass. Thank your amygdala.  Point: We need both systems.  We need lying, cheating, and stealing to be pretty automatic NOs!
 
::*List: Easy calls: sharing concert tickets with a friend.  Buying dinner for an intimate partner. Giving a more valuable gift to one person than another. Harder: Figuring out whether to donate money to help people far away.  How much?
 
::*'''Crying baby scenario'''.  Inevitable outcomes seem to matter here.  Brain wrestles, as in experience. vmPFC (evaluates/weighs) 
 
::*Lack of Tribal identity might tilt us toward rule based ethics. Equal treatment. Automatic systems not designed for a world that could help strangers 10,000 miles away.
 
::*Loyalty cases: men placing loyalty to men above other virtuesAssumptions about family relationship. Do families sometime impose on your loyalty (can be disfunctional)? [Recent example of the Jan 6 insurrectionist who threatened his family not to rat him out.  They did.]  The "worth being loyal to" part is sometimes unexamined. [recall the passenger dilemma]
 
::*Example: Spending lots of money on a birthday party. 
 
::*Back to Dillon: Acknowledges limits.  Liver story.  Bits of liver.  It grows back. Partners not so much.
 
::*Mazarin’s story about giving to alleviate Japanese disaster.  We can retriever.
 
::*— Giving Well — you really can save lives.
 
::*Closing point by Joshua Greene.  If you ran into a burning building and saved someone, it would be a highpoint of your life. Why not consider the same outcome heroic even if it doesn't involve a burning building?
 
  
===Rawls Theory of Justice ===
+
:*24ff: the sacrificial feast.  Note food hierarchies, 25.  Also, status and meat consumption (18). 
  
::*16 minute video focused on Rawls: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6k08C699zI&feature=youtu.be].
+
:*Beer and grain culture: Ninkasi (again, vertical connection)
::*6 minute video, PBS series: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0CTHVCkm90&feature=youtu.be]
 
  
:*PBS short video on Rawls
+
:*Carribean and South American cassava and potato cuisines. Maize Cuisine of MesoamericaCorn 7,000 bc, by 3,000 maize extends into Ecuador.   
:*Justice as fairness - Ancient Greeks: harmony. Range of goals: liberty, caring for needs, etc.
 
:*Justice is about distribution of goods“Distributive justice”. Examples: equality, needs, merit (getting what you deserve), Rawls- Justice is fairness.  Response to natural inequalities.  This is a form of needs based justice.  Life is unfair, justice is a remedy for that.
 
:*Nozick (Libertarian) objects: Wilt Chamberlain thought experiment.  Unjust to even out the playing field.  As long as we don’t get our stuff by unjust means, we deserve our stuff. 
 
:*Negative rights v positive rights“Freedom from interference” v “Right to some goods”
 
  
:*”Then and Now” video
+
:*'''Grains, Cities, States and Armies'''
::*Rawls’ Theory of Justice 1972
 
::*Responding to utilitarian views of justice.  Criticism of utilitarianism.  Might not protect rights sufficiently.  Slavery example. 
 
::*Rawls want to mix a rights view with distributive justice.  Rights are not directly utilitarian (though possibly indirectly)
 
  
:*Original Social Contract tradition.  Another Enlightenment philosophical product!  See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract Social Contract wiki].
+
:*3 cheers for grains and roots: favorable labor ratio. Experiment. roots naturally stored and storablep. 30 technology of thrasing and milling important here. "grinding slaves"
::*Social contract traditionOriginal position'''What rules and principles would it be rational to choose?'''
 
:*Rawls' basic method: Principles of justice should be chosen by following a kind of thought experiment in which you imagine yourself not knowing specific things about your identity and social circumstances. Adopting this special stance is what Rawls calls the "veil of ignorance" (parallel in Social Contract tradition)
 
:*Original Position in Rawls' thought: Choosing principles of justice under a "veil of ignorance" (simple intuition about fairness: How do you divide the last piece of cake?
 
::*Note how this realizes a basic condition of moral thought: neutrality, universalization, fairness.
 
  
::*In the original position:
+
:*Early breads p. 34
:::*You still know: human psychology, human history, economics, the general types of possible situations in which humans can find themselves.
 
:::*You don't know: your place in society, your class, social status, for tu in in natural assets and abilities, sex, race, physical handicaps, generation, social class of our parents, whether you are part of a discriminated group, etc.
 
  
::*Note Rawls' argument for choosing things you don't know.  He considers them "morally arbitrary."  You don't deserve to be treated better or worse for your ethnicity, talents, health status, orientation, etc. Recall historically arbitrary differences like noble birth that we used to treat as morally significant. 
+
:*35: interesting chance to reflect on ancient supply chains: everything moves on backs, animals, and carts at 3mph.   ''Kilometer zero'' easier in the ancient world!
::*A conservative theorist might object.  If a healthy person can earn more money and the freedom to earn money is a matter of moral consequence, then maybe health isn't morally arbitrary?  On the other hand, you might be hard pressed to claim that you “deserve” more money because you had healthier genes.  For Rawls, it might still be just for you to earn more, but you should also acknowledge that you are benefiting from “morally arbitrary” features of your existence while others are suffering from morally arbitrary deficits.
 
  
:*So, what principles would it be rational to choose?
+
:*high vs. humble cuisine.  36
 +
::*high cuisines heavy in meats, sweets, fats, and intoxicants.  highly processed ingredients (whiter flour). luury foods, appetizers (70% of calories)
 +
::*humble cuisines - roots or grains with greens.  80-90% of population, 70-75% of calories from this.
 +
:::*humble eaters shorter, less energetic, and less clever.  malnutrition in pregnancy is a horror for development....
  
:*Rawls claims we would choose the following two principles
+
:*town poor vs. country poor -- town poor often fared better. "The chicken is the country's but the city eats it"Below the peasant was the nomad.
::*1) '''Principle of Equal Liberty''': Each person has an equal right to the most extensive liberties compatible with similar liberties for all.
 
::*Basic liberties 11:46. Play.  Freedom from: right to vote, speech, assembly, freedom of thought, property, from arbitrary arrest, from discriminationPositive: Opportunities, basic education.  (Egalitarian about rights.)
 
::*2) '''Difference Principle''': Social and economic inequalities should be arranged so that they are both (a) to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged persons, and (b) attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of equality of opportunity. (Welfare principle for distribution of goods.). “Maximin” strategy maximizing the minimum possible position.  Based on a risk calculation. (Note: people have different risk tolerance.  Could be a criticism.) 
 
  
:*The core intuition behind Rawls' approach is that some things are "morally arbitrary"The veil is an attempt to exclude them.
+
:*(Mention modern parallels to food deserts in agricultural areas.)  Two kinds of injustice: food desert and specialty foods. 
 +
 +
:*some bread history 34ancient supply chains 35: everything on backs, animals and carts at 3mph.
  
===Small Group Discussion: Is there a limit to kin partiality?===
+
:*'''High and Humble Cuisines''' p. 36  defs 37 and 38.
  
:*One way to promote altruism is Dillion’s strategy - give your money and maybe a kidney.  But another way to assess altruism is at critical junctures in your life, such as between generations. 
+
:*'''Ancient Culinary Philosophy'''
  
:*Imagine three futures for yourself. In all of them, you grow up to have a successful career, a family with two kids, and a medium size extended familyYou are approaching retirement and your retirement and estate planning recalls a distant memory of an ethics class which talked about "justified partiality." You and your partner are wondering if you should leave all of your estate to your children or not.  Remember, you will have access to this money until you die, so you could cover end of life care for yourself and your partner.  Consider these three scenarios:
+
::*"Cuisine" is more than the foods themselves. A Cuisine represents a system of food production (food system, and cooking skills) that represent a life sustaining dietBut a culinary philosophy relates our cuisine to larger structures (43),  
  
::*A. You and your partner retire with about 1 million dollars, a paid off house, and good health insurance.
+
:*Introduced at p. 7, but also at 44ff.
::*B. You have all of the conditions in A, but 2 million dollars in net worth.
+
:::*a '''principle of hierarchy''' - nomad, peasant, poor town dweller, ....noble.  Monarch's status connected to power to protect harvest. (Power to feed fed power.) moral theory of food values. 44.   
::*C. Same as B, but 8 million dollars.
+
:::*a '''sacrificial bargain'''  - gets replaced by universal religions and personal salvation. like the transaction with monarch. includes human sacrifice.  blood never neutral in cuisine.  Either strong positive or negative. 
 +
:::*a '''theory of the culinary cosmos''' -- Fire thought to be a thing, not just kinetic energy. analogy of fire from sun in growth to fire in cooking.  also, heat in the belly.
 +
::*"Culinary philosophy - relates us to divinity, society, and the natural world (2), also, new political and philosophical ideas affect cuisines (6) (ex. Buddhist cuisines)  -- "Food situates us." 50 (story of Tuscan friend)
  
:*For all three scenarios, assume that all indications suggest continued growth of your assets.  You are also "aging well"!
+
====General Claims and Inferences====
  
:*In your group discussion, pretend you are actually making this estate planning decisionWould you give 100% of your estate to your kids and relatives in each scenario? What considerations come into the discussion? (Note: you could continue the options by imagining an estate with larger value - 16 million -- 16 billion.)
+
:*This overview of "grain and root" cooking from 20,000 ya should expand your sense of human foods in several ways:
 +
::*Food history is not just a binary of paleolithic/neolithic (preag/ag). Cooking grains goes back 20K. "Foodways"
 +
::*Long before bread, grain cookery produced cakes, porridges, pottages, ashcakes, flatbreads, pasta, etc.  Maize isn't just corn on the cob, but tortilla, polenta, etc.
 +
::*Alot of grain in the ancient world went to beer production
 +
::*Connections between cuisine and power, cuisine and gods.  Food is power.  Food is cosmic.
 +
::*Old story: high cuisine is a development from humble cuisineHer story: movement of food, and food tech connected to empire and power. High cuisine involves use of food to express status and hierarchy. High and humble on different tracks.
 +
::*Before markets, people still had to make calculations of labor calories for food calories.  Lauden argues that root cuisines could not support cities (details at 31-32, also 35).  Still, grains are also labor intensive.  "Grinding slaves" 32.  
  
:*[https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/second-quarter-2019/wealth-retired-households Data on household net worth at retirement]
+
::*Group Discussion: Are there modern equivalents in our food culture for the categories of ancient culinary philosophy? Do we engage in hierarchical eating?  Have we made some other kind of bargain with the forces that we believe sustain our food security?  Do we have a culinary cosmos?

Latest revision as of 15:48, 19 March 2025

15. MAR 19: Unit Four: Food Culture

Assigned Work

  • Lauden, Rachel, Cuisine and Empire, Introduction (1-9;8) and part of Chapter 1, "Mastering Grain Cookery" (9-42).

In-class

  • Small group exchange on Spring Break eating and Practicum efforts
  • Some lunch strategies and recipes in the spirit of Barbara Rolls and NSP

Some lunch strategies and recipes in the spirit of Barbara Rolls and NSP

  • This is just one strategy for a part of your diet, but it might appeal to some of you. It is plant-based, high fiber & protein, and consistent with NSP theory and Barbara Rolls theory of volumetrics.
  • My “shelf stable” foods. [1]
  • Lunch strategy:
  • Part A: A rotation of several "protein-veg" salads that prep in about an hour and last 4 days.
  • Part B: A fruit salad that preps in about 20 minutes and last 4 days.
  • Part A
  • Part B
  • Future topic: Salad theory -


Introduction to "Cuisine and Empire"

  • Introduction - core idea for the book from her Hawaii book. Movements of food, technology, and technique get consolidated into cuisines that spread, often in connection with power and empire or nation state. Wants to displace an older story in which high cuisine is an evolution from humble cuisine.
  • Hypothesizes 10 global cuisines, all based on roots and grains. 6
  • Chapter 1
  • 1,000 bc - 50 million humans, cities no larger than 10,000. Cooking already for up to 2 million years. Richard Wrangham, Catching Fire!.
  • Major change: technology to harvest food from hard seed of herbaceous plants (grains) p. 12. Lake Kinneret site (Sea of Galilee) 19.4K ya. Only grain cultures were able to support cities.
  • Global Culinary Geography, CA. 1000 BCE. see map
  • Cuisines of the Yellow River (18), Yangzte River (19), and barley wheat cuisines of Turkey, Mediterranean.
  • 24ff: the sacrificial feast. Note food hierarchies, 25. Also, status and meat consumption (18).
  • Beer and grain culture: Ninkasi (again, vertical connection)
  • Carribean and South American cassava and potato cuisines. Maize Cuisine of Mesoamerica. Corn 7,000 bc, by 3,000 maize extends into Ecuador.
  • Grains, Cities, States and Armies
  • 3 cheers for grains and roots: favorable labor ratio. Experiment. roots naturally stored and storable. p. 30 technology of thrasing and milling important here. "grinding slaves"
  • Early breads p. 34
  • 35: interesting chance to reflect on ancient supply chains: everything moves on backs, animals, and carts at 3mph. Kilometer zero easier in the ancient world!
  • high vs. humble cuisine. 36
  • high cuisines heavy in meats, sweets, fats, and intoxicants. highly processed ingredients (whiter flour). luury foods, appetizers (70% of calories)
  • humble cuisines - roots or grains with greens. 80-90% of population, 70-75% of calories from this.
  • humble eaters shorter, less energetic, and less clever. malnutrition in pregnancy is a horror for development....
  • town poor vs. country poor -- town poor often fared better. "The chicken is the country's but the city eats it". Below the peasant was the nomad.
  • (Mention modern parallels to food deserts in agricultural areas.) Two kinds of injustice: food desert and specialty foods.
  • some bread history 34. ancient supply chains 35: everything on backs, animals and carts at 3mph.
  • High and Humble Cuisines p. 36 defs 37 and 38.
  • Ancient Culinary Philosophy
  • "Cuisine" is more than the foods themselves. A Cuisine represents a system of food production (food system, and cooking skills) that represent a life sustaining diet. But a culinary philosophy relates our cuisine to larger structures (43),
  • Introduced at p. 7, but also at 44ff.
  • a principle of hierarchy - nomad, peasant, poor town dweller, ....noble. Monarch's status connected to power to protect harvest. (Power to feed fed power.) moral theory of food values. 44.
  • a sacrificial bargain - gets replaced by universal religions and personal salvation. like the transaction with monarch. includes human sacrifice. blood never neutral in cuisine. Either strong positive or negative.
  • a theory of the culinary cosmos -- Fire thought to be a thing, not just kinetic energy. analogy of fire from sun in growth to fire in cooking. also, heat in the belly.
  • "Culinary philosophy - relates us to divinity, society, and the natural world (2), also, new political and philosophical ideas affect cuisines (6) (ex. Buddhist cuisines) -- "Food situates us." 50 (story of Tuscan friend)

General Claims and Inferences

  • This overview of "grain and root" cooking from 20,000 ya should expand your sense of human foods in several ways:
  • Food history is not just a binary of paleolithic/neolithic (preag/ag). Cooking grains goes back 20K. "Foodways"
  • Long before bread, grain cookery produced cakes, porridges, pottages, ashcakes, flatbreads, pasta, etc. Maize isn't just corn on the cob, but tortilla, polenta, etc.
  • Alot of grain in the ancient world went to beer production
  • Connections between cuisine and power, cuisine and gods. Food is power. Food is cosmic.
  • Old story: high cuisine is a development from humble cuisine. Her story: movement of food, and food tech connected to empire and power. High cuisine involves use of food to express status and hierarchy. High and humble on different tracks.
  • Before markets, people still had to make calculations of labor calories for food calories. Lauden argues that root cuisines could not support cities (details at 31-32, also 35). Still, grains are also labor intensive. "Grinding slaves" 32.
  • Group Discussion: Are there modern equivalents in our food culture for the categories of ancient culinary philosophy? Do we engage in hierarchical eating? Have we made some other kind of bargain with the forces that we believe sustain our food security? Do we have a culinary cosmos?