Difference between revisions of "APR 2"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==21: APR 2. Unit Five: Cultural Evolution== ===Assigned=== :*Henrich Prelude and C1 – “WEIRD Psychology” (21-58; 37) – literacy and neuroplasticity, Protestantism a...")
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==21: APR 2. Unit Five: Cultural Evolution==
+
==19. APR 2==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*Henrich Prelude and C1 – “WEIRD Psychology” (21-58; 37) – literacy and neuroplasticity, Protestantism and literacy, WEIRD cultural psychology, individualism complex, guilt and shame, conformity, patience, impersonal honesty, passenger dilemma, trust, impersonal prosociality, intentionality, analytic thinking.
+
:*Andrews, Geoff. Chapter 2: "The Critique of 'Fast Life'" ''The Slow Food Story'' (pp. 29-47). (18)
  
 
===In-Class===
 
===In-Class===
  
 +
:*Launch Food Ethics Documentary Assignment.
  
===Henrich, Prelude and C1 - "WEIRD Psychology," from The Weirdest People on Earth"===
+
===Food Ethics Documentary Assignment===
  
:*'''Prelude: Your Brain has been modified by culture'''
+
:*Part of our study of Food Ethics issues will involve invited reports from you on either one of the Food Ethics Documentary on the wiki page [https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Documentaries_specific_to_Food_Ethics_and_Animal_Slaughter  Documentaries specific to Food Ethics and Animal Slaughter] or on a Food Ethics topic that you are curious about. 
  
::*Example of how reading alters brains.  "Literacy thus provides an example of how culture can change people biologically independent of any genetic differences."
+
:*In either case, the goal is to report to the class briefly (10-20 mins) on the film or topicPlease feel free to work in pairs or a group of three.
::*The ‘letterbox’ in your brain
 
::*Literacy in Western Europe - a “cultural package” that includes abilities, but also attitudes toward education, technologies of literacy like printing. 
 
::*Note how a “culture of literacy” can cut across other cultures.  Right hemisphere bias in facial recognition common to university students across cultures. 
 
::*1517: Protestantism requires literacy.  "sola scriptura"
 
::*Showing causal relationship with "quasi-experimental" method  "For every 100 km traveled from Wittenberg, percentage of Protestants dropped 10%. Like a "dosage".  Also drove female literacy and public education.   
 
::*Also seen in literacy rates of Catholic and Prot missionaries to Africa: Protestant missions produce more literacy. 
 
::*Point of his book, “The WEIRDEST People in the World,”: WEIRD psychology is the result of a set of cultural adaptations promoted by the Catholic church.
 
::*The movement of “sola scriptura” led to an explosion of literacy, which had numerous cultural effects, but the bigger story of how we became WEIRD starts with the Catholic Churches’ “Marriage and Family Plan” (Chapter 1).
 
  
:*'''Chapter 1: WEIRD Psychology'''
+
:*When you are ready, please go to the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScjafsUKCtmZOupFFPuEvCnJ-VxJygyj7BiGxWlGAds0ijBzw/viewform?usp=sf_link sign up form].
  
::*WEIRD: individualistic, self-obsessed, control-oriented, nonconformist, and analytical.  Tends to look for universal categories, analytic.  patient, takes plesure in hard work, sticks to imparial rules or principles, guilt vs. shame
+
===Small Group Discussion: How Fast is your Food Culture?===
  
::*Major Claim: WEIRD psychology is a product of 600-1000 years of the Catholic Church's modification of our psychology through its "Marriage and Family Plan".
+
:*For this short group discussion, think of times in your current or past life where you enjoyed "slow life", the kind of experience of food and conviviality described by slow food advocates. For example:
  
:*'''Really, who are you?'''
+
::*A group house diner that lingers and leads to great conversation or other fun.
::*"Who Am I? task by culture
+
::*A friend comes to dinner, maybe you cook together,  
::*Mapping the Individualism Complex vs. Kin-based institutions
+
::*A meal out, no hurry, lingering while the restaurant empties out.
:::*Might be ''obligated'' to avenge a murder,  
+
::*Coffee/tea with a friend, conversation goes on past the drinks.
:::*''Prohibited'' from marrying a stranger / ''privileged'' to marry mother’s brother’s daughters.
+
::*Meaningful wasting of timeSleeping in, pottering about, seconds on coffee and breakfast....
:::*''Responsible'' to carry out expensive ancestor rituals.
+
:*Share your stories (and feel free to say you don't have this sort of experience!), but then shift the group discussion to try to identify what, if anything, is valuable about "slow life"?
:::*''Liable'' for family members crimes.
 
:::*Note the italicized moral termsMoral culture changes with sociocentrism/individualism, as in Haidt.   
 
::*Contrast on p. 28. In the Industrial World "everyone is shopping for better relationships."  Read specific contrasts.
 
::*Hofstede's scale for measuring individualism/sociocentrism -
 
::*Economic prosperity and Individualism may be in two way causal relationship.
 
::*Note caveats to this research on p. 31.  1. As with physio-politics, '''not''' say one cultural package is objectively better than another. [Arguably, individualism and markets got us to the crisi of climate change.] 2. As with physio-politics, the categories mask numerous continuous differences. 
 
  
:*'''Cultivating the WEIRD self'''
+
:*Discussion questions:
::*Research showing individualists cultivate "consistency across relationships" vs. kin-based "consistency within relationships”.
+
::*How much is it your habit already? In light of our reading, is it an aspiration?  
::*Dispositionalism - seeing people's behavior as anchored impersonal traits that influence actions across contexts. The Fundamental Attribution Error (33) is a bias of WEIRD people, not a universal cognitive bias. WEIRD people suffer more from cognitive dissonance because of the type of consistency valued in WEIRD culture.
+
::*What is it about our culture that works against "slow life"? How much of that do you embrace or feel critical of these cultural forces?
::*Guilt vs. Shame
 
::*Conformity - Solom Asch's experiments in which confederates give incorrect answers to test conformity. WEIRD cultures show lowest conformity. 37-38.
 
  
:*'''Marshmallows Come to Those Who Wait'''
+
===Andrews, Chapters 1 & 2, The Slow Food Story===
::*"Discounting" as a measure of '''patience''' - "temporal discounting" widely researched through "choice" studies: "Would you rather X now or X+Y later?"  Patience correlated with better socio-economic outcomes.  Larger construct: "self-control" "self-regulation - Marshmallow studies.  [https://youtu.be/QX_oy9614HQ]
 
::*'''Impersonal Honesty''' --
 
:::*UN Diplomats' parking violations research.  Natural experiment on existing parking violations.  Volume of tickets correlates with country's standing on "corruption index". 
 
:::*Impersonal Honesty Game, like the Matrix research from Ariely, normed against probability of each die roll. Also correlates with corruption index. (results at p. 44).  "quintessentially WEIRD experiment as there is no person affected by the dishonesty.  In some cultures, you would be criticized for not taking advantage of the experiment to help your family.
 
::*'''Universalism and Non-relationalism''' -- Research using the "Passengers Dilemma" -- does your friend have a right to expect you to lie to help him evade a parking fine?  related results: willingness to give insider information, lie about medical exam to lower insurance rates, write a fake review of a friend's restaurant. Measures also importance of '''impartial rules'''
 
::*'''Trusting Strangers''' - "Generalized Trust Question" (GTQ) survey instrument.  measures impersonal trust vs. trust in relationship based networks.  Norway: 70% Trinidad 4-5% Interesting variation in the US.  Northern Italy 49% Sicily 26%.  [Interesting discussion of forms of trust.  Countries can report high trust on the GTQ, but it may not be impersonal trust.  To get at that you have to ask specifically about trusting strangers.]
 
::*'''Impersonal Prosociality'''  roughly, "how we feel toward a person who is not tied into our social network" - correlated with national wealth, better government, less corruption, faster innovation. 
 
::*'''Obsessed with intentions''' -- Bob/Rob and Andy vignette research.  The "Bob" condition involves intent.  Barrett and Laurence research.  Focus on intentional dishonesty correlates with WEIRD culture.  Independent research on Japanese (less focused on intentions), suggests that other factors about Japan's culture affect outcomes.
 
::*'''Analytic vs. Holistic thinking'''.  Triad Task.  (read 53) Abstract rule-based vs. Functional relationship.  Analytics focus on rules, types, continuity. Example: Would you match "rabbit" with "carrot" or "cat"? Possible that even some of the Mapuche's "analytic" answers had holistic reasoning.  pig/dog pig/husks.  Also, attention and memory studies: East Asians remember background/context better that WEIRD people.  Americans track the center of attention. 
 
::*WEIRD also have great '''endowment effect, overestimate our talents, self-enhance, enjoy making choices'''.
 
::*Summary table on p. 56. 
 
  
:*Henrich's larger argument:
+
====Chapter 1, "Politics in Search of Pleasure"====
::*The Catholic Church, through it "Marriage and Family Plan" (started around 600 a.d.), started the process that made us WEIRDSee Henrich, C14, "The Dark Matter of History" for summary of the book's argument(In shared folder.)
+
 
::*Movement from kin and clan based European culture, to "voluntary associations (guilds, charter towns, universities) drove the expansion of impersonal markets, and spurred the rapid growth of cities.
+
(This wasn't assigned for us, but I have these notes to share:)
::*Key elements of the Church's "Marriage and Family Plan"
+
:*context for slow food: social movements of the 60's and 70's.  (Italian counter-culture.)
:::*Monogamous marriages only
+
:*low power radio stations common means: Radio Bra Onde Rosse.
:::*No kin marriage
+
:*politics at Club Tenco, also the pursuit of pleasure.
:::*No arranged marriage
+
:*revival of traditional festivals: the singing for eggs (Cante i'euv)
:::*Neolocal residence (married couples move out of parents' house)
+
:*1982 incident: Montalcino Sagra del Tordo (thrush) Mention Arci clubs.
:::*Inheritance by testament
+
::*in play: '''Is the pursuit of pleasure through healthy food and culture a capitalist bourgeoisie plot or a fundamental "right to pleasure" to be advocated politically?'''
:::*Individual property
+
:*formation of an "Arci Gola" (appetite)
:::*No adoption
+
:*projects: Gambero Rosso, wine guides, Osterie d'Italia, guides to osterie.
 +
:*1986: wine poisoning scandal. McDonalds opens in Rome at Spanish Steps.
 +
:*Slow Food Manifesto
 +
:*Parallel movement in US embodied on story of Alice Waters, founder of [http://www.chezpanisse.com/menus/restaurant-menu/ Chez Panisse]Pollan also finds sources of these ideas in 1960s US counter-culture.
 +
:*Eco-gastronomy -- (a great sub-field of food study, by the way! cf. Dan Berber, The Third Plate) and the "politics of aesthetics" (only partly in line with Marxism).  (So Carlo Petrini is another candidate for Gramsci's authentic intellectual.)
 +
:*Projects: international food exhibitions, then Terra Madre (2004), related movements in Germany (Greens)
 +
:*slow food also has a conservative dimensionRestoration and preservation of historical food systems.
 +
::*Mention experience with Guido and the ancient grains seminar.  Photos.
 +
 
 +
====Chapter 2, "The Critique of 'Fast Life'"====
 +
 
 +
:*some key dates: McDonald's in Rome, 1986, incident between the two arci chapters (a moment in which politics and gastronomy interact to great effect!). 
 +
:*critique of "productivity culture"; efficiency vs. frenzy; idea that you need to live faster because other things are accelerating (financial trade volume, sale, news cycles, social media posting and communication). Especially focused on speed. 
 +
:*[In terms we have been using, Slow Food manifesto calls into question the "culinary cosmos" of the industrial lifestyle ''when it compromises basic human modes of experiencing pleasure in authentic and just food.''  ]
 +
:*critique includes resistance to corporate formations and rationalizations (degradation) of taste.  Slow Food is tied to leftist politics, but also has a US upper middle class "face" in the US site.  [https://www.slowfoodusa.org/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwzpfHBRC1iIaL78Ol-eIBEiQAdZPVKlmzqWS_FmOH2gJfU8ltX286Ru8IBHGg3w0LO9EgXVYaAjWK8P8HAQ] 
 +
:*Castell's theory of time-space compression -- capitalism more and more about speed of transactions.  circulation of capital.  (on edge of a big discussion about the future of work - piece work is coming back).
 +
:*Counter view of Charles Leadbeater and others: '''fast culture is the answer''', the problem is that we have all of these institutions from the 19th century and earlier slowing us down. 
 +
:*Victoria de Grazia, ''Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th Century Europe'' -- American hegemony in food expressed in "reduction" of all class and value distinctions in food.  Rich and poor eat McD's.
 +
:*Ritzer's "McDonaldization of Society" -- "globalization of nothing" (social forms centrally conceived, centrally controlled and lacking in context). 
 +
:*Schlosser, Fast Food Nation:
 +
::*1970 6 billion on fast food; ("million" in the text is a mistake, I think)
 +
::*2001 110 billion
 +
::*2010 200 billion (not in text)
 +
:*British "trolley towns"; American suburbs.  globalization of construction and architecture.
 +
:*Petrini on slowness: p. 39 read 
 +
:*[https://www.cittaslow.org/ Slow cities]: features of slow cities: "A 54-point charter was developed, encouraging high quality local food and drink, general conviviality and the opposition to cultural standardisation." (from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cittaslow Cittaslow wiki])
 +
 
 +
:*[https://www.slowfoodusa.org/ Slow Food USA]
 +
 
 +
====Small Group Discussion: Slow food culture====
 +
 
 +
:*Does Slow Food culture require a loss of productivity or is it more about reclaiming some of your time for an essential activity, or both?
 +
:*Does the slow food movement present an attractive ideal for you?  Or do you find yourself agreeing with Leadbeater that "fast culture is the answer"?
 +
:*For those of you for whom it is an attractive ideal, identify 3-5 ways that you might implement slow food culture in your life?

Latest revision as of 20:39, 2 April 2025

19. APR 2

Assigned Work

  • Andrews, Geoff. Chapter 2: "The Critique of 'Fast Life'" The Slow Food Story (pp. 29-47). (18)

In-Class

  • Launch Food Ethics Documentary Assignment.

Food Ethics Documentary Assignment

  • In either case, the goal is to report to the class briefly (10-20 mins) on the film or topic. Please feel free to work in pairs or a group of three.

Small Group Discussion: How Fast is your Food Culture?

  • For this short group discussion, think of times in your current or past life where you enjoyed "slow life", the kind of experience of food and conviviality described by slow food advocates. For example:
  • A group house diner that lingers and leads to great conversation or other fun.
  • A friend comes to dinner, maybe you cook together,
  • A meal out, no hurry, lingering while the restaurant empties out.
  • Coffee/tea with a friend, conversation goes on past the drinks.
  • Meaningful wasting of time. Sleeping in, pottering about, seconds on coffee and breakfast....
  • Share your stories (and feel free to say you don't have this sort of experience!), but then shift the group discussion to try to identify what, if anything, is valuable about "slow life"?
  • Discussion questions:
  • How much is it your habit already? In light of our reading, is it an aspiration?
  • What is it about our culture that works against "slow life"? How much of that do you embrace or feel critical of these cultural forces?

Andrews, Chapters 1 & 2, The Slow Food Story

Chapter 1, "Politics in Search of Pleasure"

(This wasn't assigned for us, but I have these notes to share:)

  • context for slow food: social movements of the 60's and 70's. (Italian counter-culture.)
  • low power radio stations common means: Radio Bra Onde Rosse.
  • politics at Club Tenco, also the pursuit of pleasure.
  • revival of traditional festivals: the singing for eggs (Cante i'euv)
  • 1982 incident: Montalcino Sagra del Tordo (thrush) Mention Arci clubs.
  • in play: Is the pursuit of pleasure through healthy food and culture a capitalist bourgeoisie plot or a fundamental "right to pleasure" to be advocated politically?
  • formation of an "Arci Gola" (appetite)
  • projects: Gambero Rosso, wine guides, Osterie d'Italia, guides to osterie.
  • 1986: wine poisoning scandal. McDonalds opens in Rome at Spanish Steps.
  • Slow Food Manifesto
  • Parallel movement in US embodied on story of Alice Waters, founder of Chez Panisse. Pollan also finds sources of these ideas in 1960s US counter-culture.
  • Eco-gastronomy -- (a great sub-field of food study, by the way! cf. Dan Berber, The Third Plate) and the "politics of aesthetics" (only partly in line with Marxism). (So Carlo Petrini is another candidate for Gramsci's authentic intellectual.)
  • Projects: international food exhibitions, then Terra Madre (2004), related movements in Germany (Greens)
  • slow food also has a conservative dimension. Restoration and preservation of historical food systems.
  • Mention experience with Guido and the ancient grains seminar. Photos.

Chapter 2, "The Critique of 'Fast Life'"

  • some key dates: McDonald's in Rome, 1986, incident between the two arci chapters (a moment in which politics and gastronomy interact to great effect!).
  • critique of "productivity culture"; efficiency vs. frenzy; idea that you need to live faster because other things are accelerating (financial trade volume, sale, news cycles, social media posting and communication). Especially focused on speed.
  • [In terms we have been using, Slow Food manifesto calls into question the "culinary cosmos" of the industrial lifestyle when it compromises basic human modes of experiencing pleasure in authentic and just food. ]
  • critique includes resistance to corporate formations and rationalizations (degradation) of taste. Slow Food is tied to leftist politics, but also has a US upper middle class "face" in the US site. [1]
  • Castell's theory of time-space compression -- capitalism more and more about speed of transactions. circulation of capital. (on edge of a big discussion about the future of work - piece work is coming back).
  • Counter view of Charles Leadbeater and others: fast culture is the answer, the problem is that we have all of these institutions from the 19th century and earlier slowing us down.
  • Victoria de Grazia, Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th Century Europe -- American hegemony in food expressed in "reduction" of all class and value distinctions in food. Rich and poor eat McD's.
  • Ritzer's "McDonaldization of Society" -- "globalization of nothing" (social forms centrally conceived, centrally controlled and lacking in context).
  • Schlosser, Fast Food Nation:
  • 1970 6 billion on fast food; ("million" in the text is a mistake, I think)
  • 2001 110 billion
  • 2010 200 billion (not in text)
  • British "trolley towns"; American suburbs. globalization of construction and architecture.
  • Petrini on slowness: p. 39 read
  • Slow cities: features of slow cities: "A 54-point charter was developed, encouraging high quality local food and drink, general conviviality and the opposition to cultural standardisation." (from Cittaslow wiki)

Small Group Discussion: Slow food culture

  • Does Slow Food culture require a loss of productivity or is it more about reclaiming some of your time for an essential activity, or both?
  • Does the slow food movement present an attractive ideal for you? Or do you find yourself agreeing with Leadbeater that "fast culture is the answer"?
  • For those of you for whom it is an attractive ideal, identify 3-5 ways that you might implement slow food culture in your life?