Difference between revisions of "Critical Thinking Study Guide"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 58: | Line 58: | ||
5th Discipline: Seeing Complexity | 5th Discipline: Seeing Complexity | ||
− | 1. Simplification as part of knowledge production | + | :1. Simplification as part of knowledge production |
− | 2. Systems, complex systems, chaotic systems (links, nodes, degrees of separation) | + | :2. Systems, complex systems, chaotic systems (links, nodes, degrees of separation) |
− | 3. Coupling, buffering, feedback loops | + | :3. Coupling, buffering, feedback loops |
− | 4. degrees of separation | + | :4. degrees of separation |
− | 5. Konigsburg bridge problem | + | :5. Konigsburg bridge problem |
− | 6. Baltimore syphilis epidemic | + | :6. Baltimore syphilis epidemic |
− | 7. What do good managers of complex systems do? | + | :7. What do good managers of complex systems do? |
− | 8. Thin slicing and the return of intuition | + | :8. Thin slicing and the return of intuition |
− | 9. Stereotyping | + | :9. Stereotyping |
Revision as of 18:00, 1 May 2009
Note: On concepts be sure to be able to identify, define, and explain the significance of each concept.
1st Discipline: Reflective Voice
- Five Disciplines of Thought
- Terms: Rationales, arguments, explanations, claim, premise, conclusion, reflective/deliberative context. (p. 3)
- Thinking in Stereo: what is it, what questions are asked at each level.
- Thought Experiment for finding reflective ideals: What do you need to count on when you begin a serious discussion with someone? What specific values and expectations should one have? What mutual obligations follow? p. 12 and following.
- Reflective ideals: sympathetic understanding, seeking knowledge, inviting appraisal.
2nd Discipline: Reconstruction
- Theory of Rationales (handbook) - basic distinction between argument and explanation.
- Distinguishing argument and explanation (skill of identification from exercise set "Distinguishing Argument from Explanation).
- 3 Criteria for Good Reconstruction.
- Reconstruction (skill) Might have a short argument to reconstruct.
- Distinguishing Deductive and Inductive arguments. (skill) also, give definitions and compare.
- How do you show logical structure in deductive arguments? in inductive? in explanation?
- Identify and give examples of basic deductive argument forms and formal fallacies.
- Validity. Esp. relation to truth. Can a valid argument have a false conclusion?
- Basic inductive patterns and inductive analogies.
- Understand discussion of "Why Mars is Red" in "Form in Explanation"
3rd Discipline: Critical Response
- 3 Techniques for assessing rationales. (skill)
- What is critical response?
- What is the difference between assessing rationales and giving a critical response?
- Ad hominem fallacy
- What factors should you consider in preparing a critical response to someone's rationales?
4th Discipline: Recognizing Knowledge
- What does is mean to define knowledge as "justified, true belief"?
- What is the "peer review" process and how does it contribute to the recognition of knowledge?
- Specific ways of avoiding deception from quantitative information: (use old textbook chapter and class notes)
- 1 What is a measure?
- 2 Percentages and rates
- 3 Linear vs. Non-linear relationships
- 4 Baseline
- 5 Surveys
- 6 Cognitive Bias
- 1 Anchoring
- 2 Framing
- 3 Hindsight bias
- 4 Fundamental attribution error
- 5 Confirmation bias
- 6 Self-serving bias
- 7 Probability
- 1 Definition,
- 2 Gambler's fallacy,
- 3 Predictive dreams
- 4 SI jinx
- 8 Causation
- 1 Regression analysis
- 2 Multiple regression analysis
5th Discipline: Seeing Complexity
- 1. Simplification as part of knowledge production
- 2. Systems, complex systems, chaotic systems (links, nodes, degrees of separation)
- 3. Coupling, buffering, feedback loops
- 4. degrees of separation
- 5. Konigsburg bridge problem
- 6. Baltimore syphilis epidemic
- 7. What do good managers of complex systems do?
- 8. Thin slicing and the return of intuition
- 9. Stereotyping