Difference between revisions of "2010 Fall Philosophy Proseminar"
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchKobywarren (talk | contribs) |
Kobywarren (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Thought Experiment == | ==Thought Experiment == | ||
| + | |||
| + | : (also falls under "Case Method" ) Nagel's case method asking "what is it like to be a bat" falls under this category. By pointing out that people cannot possibly imagine the experience accurately due to different sensory experience, etc., Nagel manages to draw general conclusions on the subjective nature of human experience. | ||
==Phenomenological Reduction == | ==Phenomenological Reduction == | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 20 September 2010
Return to [Philosophy Proseminar]
Report your examples here under a heading identifying the method. For example:
Case Method
- Hart's article uses case method because it distinguishes generalized scenarios (two involving fires and one involving assault/murder) which, he thinks, helps us clarify the problem of "tracing consequences".
Thought Experiment
- (also falls under "Case Method" ) Nagel's case method asking "what is it like to be a bat" falls under this category. By pointing out that people cannot possibly imagine the experience accurately due to different sensory experience, etc., Nagel manages to draw general conclusions on the subjective nature of human experience.
Phenomenological Reduction
- Heidegger uses phenomenological reduction to outline his theory on how Dasein percieves and assigns meaning. An example would be how he reduces perception and meaning to ready-to-hand objects and present-at-hand objects.
