Happiness Fall 2016 Class Notes
From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to searchAUG 30
Websites in this Course
- Main Website: Alfino.org links to "courses" and "wiki".
- Course Wikis (wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino)
- First time: “Join Alfino”; Use GU network login
- For anonymous login: student/bulldog
- Without login, use the wiki for: course reading schedule, google forms, lots of course info.
- With login: post work and/or links with course related information.
- Courses.Alfino: (courses.alfino.org)
- User: first part of gu-email; Password: user submitted
- Login to get pdfs, create and check grading scheme, roster, and email addresses.
SEP 1
Note on Method
- Today's readings come from a history of happiness and a contemporary philosophical reflection on "living well" -- one of our core methods in the course will involve this kind of interdisciplinary study.
- In your group exercise today, you will be working with methods such as: generating cases, ordering cases by principles, "pumping intuitions".
- Thought experiment are part of a contemporary philosophers' toolkit. Nozick's "Experience Machine" is a thought experiment.
Some notes on Teaching Methods and Advice
- grading schemes -- you may start editing your grading schemes, but it is early.
- transparency and anonymity -- Saint names, pseudonyms, dropboxes, peer review, sharing student work, grade distributions
- Note on finding audio.
- Note on finding old class notes.
- prep cycle -- reading, follow study questions from class, make notes in light of class, repeat.
- Note your responses to things in your notes so that you can go back and collect them for the paper.
- Mark or note your readings so that you can answer study questions for exams (only one required).
Some general notes on Classical Views and the problem of criteria for living well
- note how happiness emerges as a concern in Greek culture -- (and in other cultures -- will be looking at Buddhism later)
- Plato's (Socrates') view as exemplified in the Symposium -- finding happiness in the search for good accounts of things; knowledge.
- Structure of Symposium -- Love and Happiness as being drawn toward a transcendent and complete reality. (and later in Christianity)
- Specific term of Socrates' view -- eros --> desire --> lack vs. happiness --> fulfillment --> possession (self) -- problem of Alcibiades
- Aristotle's view -- telic, developmental, but also privileging the rational, similar problem as Plato. Not an account of happiness for the masses.
- Experience Machine. [1]
- Raises the question of criteria for living well --
McMahon, "Chapter 1: The Highest Good"
1. Classical Greek Models of Happiness
Key theme: Greek cultural break with accommodation to destiny. Recognition of possibility of control of circumstances determining happiness.
Implicit historical narrative: Classical Greek philosophy has a point of connection with Periclean Athens, but develops Athenian cultural values in a radically new way. This begins a distinctive kind of narrative about happiness in the West.
- 1. The Greek Cultural Model
- Connection of the culture with tragedy, appreciation of fate, happiness as gift of gods.
- Dionysian culture
- Post-Socratic Schools -- Hellenism and Hellenistic culture
- 2. The Greek Philosophical Models in Greek Philosophical culture: Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, and Zeno.
- A. Plato - Symposium gives us picture of Plato's view.
- Contrast the Symposium with the cult of Dionysius
- Reasoning our way to the Good (Happiness). Symposium as purification ritual (Summary including Alcibiades twist). bad desire/good desire. We will find real happiness in the pursuit of transcendent knowledge.
- Object of desire is transcendent. (Reminder about Platonic metaphysics.) "intellectual orgasm" (36)
- McMahon: "radical reappraisal of the standards of the world" 37
- B. Aristotle (note McMahon pp. 41ff and Aristotle reading)
- end, function, craft, techne. Hierarchy of arts.
- end vs. final end -- the universal good is the final end, not relative. sec. 6-7.
- happiness as activity of the soul in accordance with virture (def., but also consequence of reasoning from nature of human life)
- Section 13: nature of the soul. two irrational elements: veg/appetitive and one rational. Note separation/relationship.
- As M notes, Aristotle's focus on the rational part of the soul leaves him with a similar problem as Plato -- a model of happines that few (not the Alcibiades in the world) will attain.
Cahn and Vitrano, "Living Well"
- considers how various philosophers would evaluate the contrast between the fictional cases of Pat and Lee
- Taylor and Frankfurt: P&L are equal. "living in accord with your desires"
- Living well: tied to distinctions between
- "successful lives" vs. "wasted lives"
- lives pursuing "intrinsically valuable" goals
- lives that are "works of art"
- fame and achievement vs. mission and meaning vs. satisfaction with one's own activities
- concern about the possibility of ideology or cultural bias.
- Wolf's list: computer games and crossword puzzles not on the list, but why not, asks Haidt?
- why disparage making money, swimming, driving cool cars?
- why do philosopher's think they can put philosophy at the top of the list?
- Example of Phil Saltman
- Cahn and Vitrano's answer: p. 21.
Small Group Work
- Starting with the contrast between Pat and Lee, consider some of the criteria you might advocate for saying that someone was living relatively well. Is this a judgement that you can easily make? Does Aristotle's view help? Then consider whether there is any sort of relationship (from none to necessary) between living well and being happy?
SEP 6
SEP 8
SEP 13
SEP 15
SEP 20
SEP 22
SEP 27
SEP 27
OCT 4
OCT 6
OCT 11
OCT 13
OCT 18
OCT 20
OCT 25
OCT 27
NOV 1
NOV 3
NOV 8
NOV 10
NOV 15
NOV 17
NOV 22
- Thanksgiving Week: Optional Meeting Time