Should college athletes be paid?
Contents
- 1 College Athlete's Worth
- 2 In Favor of Paying College Athletes
- 2.1 The Solution to Dirty Money in College Athletics
- 2.2 Distribute the Wealth: Pay College Athletes
- 2.3 Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play?
- 2.4 College Athletes Deserve to be Paid
- 2.5 Athletes Pay Prices as Coaches Cash In
- 2.6 Should College Athletes Be Paid To Play?
- 2.7 Should College Athletes Get Paid? Ending the Debate Once and for All.
- 2.8 Time to Pay College Athletes
- 3 Not in Favor of Paying College Athletes
- 4 Punishments vs Tradition
College Athlete's Worth
A Star College Quarterback Is Worth...
Findings
Belson, K. "A Star Quarterback is Worth..." The New York Times 14 Nov. 2010: Proquest. Web. Ocotber 25, 2011. http://search.proquest.com/docview/763700166?accountid=1557;
Summary
The New York Times is looking into how much college athletes such as Cam Newton should be getting paid according to how much money they bring in for their schools. Newton's success has driven up sales of licensed gear and tickets for Auburn University.
Kevin Ward
Should college athletes be paid? As much as $1M says new report
Findings
Frommer, Frederic J. "Should college athletes be paid? As much as $1M says new report" Chicago Sun-Times September 13, 2011: web. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/colleges/7635972-419/should-college-athletes-be-paid-as-much-as-1m-says-new-report.html
Summary
The author talks about a report done by a former UCLA football player and a current Drexel University professor. They say that athletes these days are receiving far less then their fair market value. According to the two, athletes deserve an upwards of 1 million dollars due to the time they put into their sports and the revenue they bring in for their schools. At the very least, athletes deserve to get a full-ride through college without any money issues.
Kevin Ward
Should college athlete be paid? Why, they already are
Findings
Davis, Seth. "Should college athlete be paid? Why, they already are" Sports IllustratedSeptember 21, 2011: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/seth_davis/09/21/Branch.rebuttal/index.html
Summary
Seth Davis of Sports Illustrated reviews an article written by the author Taylor Branch. Branch focus' on the failed attempt by the NCAA to keep college sports amateur. He reports how 88% of division 1 football teams are losing money. This begs the question; why are teams still playing? Seth goes on to report that Branch mentions the free market, but he does not mention that these athletes do have access to the free market because of their opportunity to make it to the pros. Davis moves on to mention cheating and not compensating players. A major point he makes is that it is not the NCAA or any conferences job to stop cheating. It is the school and athletes responsibilities not to cheat. He ends by disputing Branch's statement that a free education is not a large enough pay to these athletes.
Kevin Ward
Selling the NCAA
Findings
Farrey, Tom, and Paula Lavigne. "Selling the NCAA." ESPN: The Worldwide Leader In Sports 13 March 2011. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/otl/news/story?id=6209609>.
Summary
This ESPN article looks into both sides of the issue of paying college athletes. It states how much revenue certain football and basketball and football programs bring in, and how much the athletes would be paid in comparison to professional teams. But it also looks at Mark Emmert, the president of the NCAA's point of view, who believes in preserving the amateurism of college athletics.
Marshall Riordan
In Favor of Paying College Athletes
The Solution to Dirty Money in College Athletics
Findings
López, Juan. "The Solution to Dirty Money in College Athletics: Sports, Schools Should Split | The Nevada Sagebrush." The Nevada Sagebrush - The Student Newspaper of the University of Nevada, Reno. Web. 13 Nov. 2011. <http://nevadasagebrush.com/blog/2011/10/31/sports-schools-should-split/>.
Summary
This article gives a new perspective on the ongoing argument of whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. The author first gives some information that the NCAA is thinking about paying college athletes $2000 for expenses not covered by their scholarships. His solution for this problem is to separate athletic departments from universities and have athletes recruited out of high school strictly to pay sports. There are both ups and downs to this solution, but it is good information.
Logan Torres
Distribute the Wealth: Pay College Athletes
Findings
McGrath, John. "Distribute the Wealth: Pay College Athletes." The News Tribune: C.1. Washington State Newsstand. Dec 09 1994. Web. 26 Oct. 2011 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/264515694?accountid=1557>.
Summary
John McGrath from The News Tribune is arguing that if colleges do not start paying college athletes, they are setting up for failure. Athletes find ways around not getting paid so that they can be compensated for al the revenue they bring to their schools.
Kevin Ward
Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play?
Findings
Cooper, Kenneth J. "Should College Athletes be Paid to Play?" Diverse Issues in Higher Education 28.10 (2011): 12,12-13. ProQuest Research Library. Web. 25 Oct. 2011.
Summary
This article begins by introducing two Law professors from Michigan State University. They are strongly in favor of college athletes being paid. The couple's main argument is that the athletes are employees under federal labor laws. They argue that if the student's major conflicts with their practice schedule, that certain athlete must change their major. Therefore they argue that they are primarily athletes and secondarily students. Later in the article, specific athletes give accounts as to why they don't feel as if they were employees of their particular college.
Logan Torres
College Athletes Deserve to be Paid
Findings
Wilbon, Michael. "College Athletes Deserve to Be Paid - ESPN." ESPN: The Worldwide Leader In Sports. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6778847/college-athletes-deserve-paid>.
Summary
The author of this news article, Michael Wilbon, argues that college athletes should be paid. But, he argues that only certain college athletes should be paid such as basketball and football players. The author relates this to college coaches and college professors. He states that Nick Saban, the Alabama football coach, will make more money in one year than the highest professor will in his entire tenure. Wilbon says that paying them out of individual athletic department budgets is not feasible, but if the athlete plays for a revenue-producing team, it is feasible.
Logan Torres
Athletes Pay Prices as Coaches Cash In
Findings
Rhoden, William C. "Athletes Pay Price as Coaches Cash in." Seattle Post - Intelligencer: D.4. Washington State Newsstand. Jan 09 2007. Web. 26 Oct. 2011 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/385443107?accountid=1557>.
Summary
William C. Rhoden of the Seattle PI argues that the current system of not paying college athletes is flawed. Nick Saban, the head coach of the University of Alabama football team, is in the midst of a $32 million contract. His players, however, can't even afford to fly their parents to watch them play in many cases. If a football team makes it to a bowl game that brings in excess of $1 million to the school, the players should get a cut.
Marshall Riordan
Should College Athletes Be Paid To Play?
Findings
Cooper, Kenneth J. "Should College Athletes be Paid to Play?" Diverse Issues in Higher Education 28.10 (2011): 12,12-13. ProQuest. Web. 25 Oct. 2011.
Summary
The article argues that under federal law Division I football and basketball players should be recognized as employees. Due to the high demands put on the typical division 1 athlete, they deserve to be paid. The article goes on and lists many former college athletes, professors, and coaches in favor of compensation for athletes or more scholarships offered to sports programs at universities.
Chris Atkinson
Should College Athletes Get Paid? Ending the Debate Once and for All.
Findings
Hruby, Patrick. "Should College Athletes Get Paid? Ending the Debate once and for All. The Atlantic. Apr 6 2011. Web. 26 Oct 2011. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/04/should-college-athletes-get-paid-ending-the-debate-once-and-for-all/236809/.
Summary
Both sides of the topic to pay or not pay college athletes are represented in the article. Division 1 football and basketball players generate billions in revenue yet they receive a slim portion of this only through scholarships. The other side of the argument debates that asserting the pay-for -play would destroy campus sports as we know it. Both sides are well intentioned but the article concludes stating that compensating athletes would allow campus athletes to freely participate in a normal economic life, college sports would become less hypocritical, and the rest of society would benefit due to the fact that the legal quid pro quo can be taxed.
Chris Atkinson
Time to Pay College Athletes
Findings
Morrissey, Rick. "Time to Pay College Athletes." Chicagosuntimes.com. Web. Aug 27 2011. http://www.suntimes.com/sports/morrissey/7286394-452/time-to-pay-college-athletes.html
Summary
The author feels strongly about paying college athletes. He believes division 1 football and basketball athletes deserve compensation for their work and that it is unfair how a coach can be paid millions of dollars and the athletes, who do all the work receive nothing. He uses the example of ESPN's Longhorn Network and points out that both ESPN and the University of Texas will be making millions of dollars in the upcoming years based of their television contract and the Texas's athletes will never see a dime of the profits.
Chris Atkinson
===NCAA Pushes $2k Increase for Athletes
Findings
"NCAA Weighing $2,000 Payments to Student Athletes." ESPN. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. <http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/7143961/ncaa-weighing-2000-payments-student-athletes>.
Summary
This informative article talks about NCAA President Mark Emmert's new proposal to pay athletes 2 grand on top of their scholarships. His main argument is that the $2,000 will more closely approach the actual cost of attending college for athletes, who generally don't have time for a job on the side. The article then goes on to consider some downsides of the proposal, such as the possibility that schools in weaker conferences would not have the ability to pay it, creating an imbalance in college sports.
Not in Favor of Paying College Athletes
College Athletes don't Need to be Paid
Findings
Miller, Ted. "College Athletes Don't Need to Be Paid - Pac-12 Blog - ESPN." ESPN: The Worldwide Leader In Sports. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. <http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/post/_/id/22123/college-athletes-dont-need-to-be-paid>.
Summary
In this article the author pulls information from a Joe Paterno speech. Joe Paterno is the head football coach of Penn State University. He argues that college athletes do not deserve to be paid and gives stats to prove it. His main argument shows that college athletes receive money in the form of college tuition. If you put college tuition in the form of dollars per hour, in-state college athletes make $56.25 an hour, and out-of-state college athletes make $83.25 an hour.
Logan Torres
Don't Allow Pay-for-play you fool
Findings
Robertson, Linda. "Linda Robertson | Dont Allow Pay-for-play to Fool You - Colleges - MiamiHerald.com." MiamiHerald.com - Miami & Ft. Lauderdale News, Weather, Miami Dolphins & More. Web. 13 Nov. 2011. <http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/11/04/2487835/dont-allow-pay-for-play-to-fool.html>.
Summary
In this article, the author Linda Robertson gives insight as to why college athletes should not be paid. She gives direct quotes from the president of the NCAA which also back up the argument that college athletes should not be paid. This article was extra helpful because of all the data it gives to support the argument.
Logan Torres
Should College Athletes be Paid?
Findings
Sack, Allen. "Should College Athletes be Paid?" The Christian Science Monitor: 9. ProQuest. Mar 07 2008. Web. 26 Oct. 2011 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/405570910?accountid=1557>.
Summary
The Cristian Science Monitor states how they do not believe in paying college athletes. Receiving an education is a large benefit that should not be taken for granted. As the NCAA continues to build a sports empire, athletes will want to be able to receive some of profits. The author believes that, although athletes should not be paid, they should be able to receive more benefits such as endorsements and medical.
Kevin Ward
Confessions of an Agent
Findings
Dohrmann, George. "Confessions of an Agent." Breaking News, Real-time Scores and Daily Analysis from Sports Illustrated SI.com. Sports Illustrated, 12 Oct. 2010. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/magazine/10/12/agent/index.html>.
Summary
Former agent Josh Luchs talks about what he did in his first years as an agent and the way his mentors worked. He confesses everything he did and the way different agents and players went about their business. He also gives his opinion on how he felt about paying players.
Luis Alza
Paid College Athletes: A Reasonable Compromise
Findings
Rose, Jalen. "Paid College Athletes: A Reasonable Compromise." Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 16 Mar. 2011. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jalen-rose/paid-college-athletes-a-r_b_836449.html>.
Summary
Jalen Rose who was a college basketball player at the University of Michigan and in this article says how he thinks athletes should be paid 2000 dollars per month. Jalen argues that college athletes are at universities for athletics alone and even the schools themselves have that train of thought. He comes to a conclusion that schools can remove a student-athletes scholarship no matter what his academic standing is.
Luis Alza
Don't Pay College Athletes
Findings
Ryder, Lesley. "Don't Pay College Athletes." Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post. The Hufftington Post, 18 Sept. 2011. Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lesley-ryder/pay-college-athletes-_b_968479.html>.
Summary
In this article the idea of college athletes is approached from a different perspective. The author shows how apart from the big time programs and the big time sports, there are athletes that are part of other sports and programs that do not bring in as much revenue but put in as much effort as the other athletes.
Luis Alza
Why Student-Athletes are not Paid to Play
Findings
"Why Student-Athletes are not Paid to Play." National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Web. 26 Oct. 2011. <http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/NCAA/Issues/Why+student-athletes+are+not+paid+to+play>.
Summary
This statement directly from the NCAA explains the NCAA's stance on the issue. Only 30 percent of Division I football and 26 percent of Division I Basketball programs actually post revenue over expenses, meaning the majority of universities are losing money on their athletics. Combine that with the value of a free college education, and there's plenty of reasons why college athletes are not currently paid.
Marshall Riordan
Punishments vs Tradition
College Football's Ugly Season, Facing Scandals of Every Stripe
Findings
Thamel, Pete. "College Football's Ugly Season, Facing Scandals of Every Stripe." New York Times: A.1. ProQuest. Aug 21 2011. Web. 26 Oct. 2011 <http://search.proquest.com/docview/884510786?accountid=1557>
Summary
College football punishments are becoming more abundant. Reggie Bush has given his Heisman Trophy back and Miami has faced serious charges and suspensions. As the NCAA continues to dish out punishments, teams are losing their tradition and revenue from football. This article talks about the challenge of finding a medium where teams will stop paying athletes to keep tradition and the NCAA will stop the cruel punishments.
Kevin Ward