Fall 2014 Happiness Class Notes

From Alfino
Revision as of 16:19, 21 October 2014 by Alfino (talk | contribs) (→‎OCT 21)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Return to Happiness

SEP 2

Course Introduction

1.Introductions
2.Course websites: alfino.org and wiki
3.Grading Schemes
Advice about succeeding in and enjoying the course: the Prep Cycle
4.Clickers: Turning Point "responseware" -- get the app and register. save your device id.
Grading philosophy
5.Happiness Exercise


SEP 4

1. Classical Greek Models of Happiness

Key theme: Greek cultural break with accommodation to destiny. Recognition of possibility of control of circumstances determining happiness.

Implicit historical narrative: Classical Greek philosophy has a point of connection with Periclean Athens, but develops Athenian cultural values in a radically new way. This begins a distinctive kind of narrative about happiness in the West.

1. The Greek Cultural Model
  • Connection of the culture with tragedy, appreciation of fate, happiness as gift of gods.
  • Dionysian culture
  • Post-Socratic Schools -- Hellenism and Hellenistic culture
2. The Greek Philosophical Models in Greek Philosophical culture: Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, and Zeno.
A. Plato - Symposium gives us picture of Plato's view.
  • Contrast the Symposium with the cult of Dionysius
  • Reasoning our way to the Good (Happiness). Symposium as purification ritual (Summary including Alcibiades twist). bad desire/good desire
  • Object of desire is transcendent. (Reminder about Platonic metaphysics.) "intellectual orgasm" (36)
  • McMahon: "radical reappraisal of the sandards of the world" 37
B. Aristotle (note McMahon pp. 41ff and Aristotle reading)
  • end, function, craft, techne. Hierarchy of arts.
  • end vs. final end -- the universal good is the final end, not relative. sec. 6-7.
  • happiness as activity of the soul in accordance with virture (def., but also consequence of reasoning from nature of human life)
  • Section 13: nature of the soul. two irrational elements: veg/appetitive and one rational. Note separation/relationship.
C. Hellenic Schools: Epicureans and Stoics
  • Main similarities and differences with Plato and Aristotle.
On the relationship between philosophical culture and the broader traditional culture.
Features of this cultural trajectory.

SEP 9

Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, Book I

Aristotle on happiness (based on Book 1 of Nichomachean Ethics)

  • analogy of political arts and individual function: happiness comes up in each case
  • sec. 5: types of lives compared
  • finality of happiness (sec. 7) connected with search for "function of man"
  • Function of Man (connect with section 13)
  • The need for external goods and training in the pursuit of happiness

Some criticisms

  • Problem of external goods.
  • Connection between end of man and finality of happiness.
  • Nobility vs. Happiness
  • The Moving Targets Problem

(not mentioned in class)

  • Do we even have a "function"? Just one?
  • Is there more than one kind of happiness? Why prefer H(L)?


Group work: evaluate the theory against its criticisms. How could Aristotle reply? Your own identifications and criticisms?

Note on philosophical method: Distinguishing "doing philosophy" from other kind of research.

  • metatheoretical
  • connecting practical questions to the most fundamental levels of explanation

SEP 11

Haidt, Happiness Hypothesis, Ch. 5

(gloss on "elephant" vs. "rider")

  • Major theme -- happiness as internal or external pursuit.
  • About pleasure....
  • diminishes on repeat...
  • pre-goal attainment positive affect (Davidson)
  • Buddha and Epictetus take a relatively "internal" path. Haidt suggests research shows this to be somewhat extreme direction to go -- there are things to strive for outside of yourself,
  • Progress Principle: happiness in the journey -- "Things won are done; joy's soul lies in the doing."
  • Haidt's list of happiness makers and unmakers(correlates and major causes)
  • Adaptation (habituation, also relative sensitivity to change -- nb. bottom of p. 85), hedonic treadmill, set point theory,
  • Bob and Mary comparison (87): relationship, meaningfulness. Bob's list more susceptible to adaptation. (Note some initial complications: Does marriage make people happy or do happy people marry? wealth effects (good topic for research paper).
  • Note theoretical problem: 90's findings on happiness supported genetic connection (or set point phenomenon) but not so much an environmental one (we adapt).
  • Happiness Formula
  • H = Set point + Conditions + Voluntary action
  • understanding lack of adaptation for cosmetic surgery. what's shallow vs. what matters.
  • from 92f: Noise, Commuting, Lack of Control, Shame, Relationships,
  • "It is vain to say that human beings ought to be satisfied with tranquility: they must have action; and they will make it if they cannot find it." (Charlotte Bronte, 1847) (he implies, but incorrectly, that the inward path to happiness involves a choice of inaction.)
  • Flow (experience sampling) and Seligman's "Pleasures" vs. "Gratifications"; Strengths test www.authentichappiness.org,

Working against your happiness

  • False hypotheses about material goods.
  • Comparisons and biases. Conspicuous consumption is a zero sum game.
  • Schwartz maximizers and satisficers.
    • Note concluding reflection: What are we to make of the Calcutta reports?

SEP 16

Method Lessons Today

  • Quick review of model for thinking about science.
  • Relationship between phenomenological and scientific inquiry.

Schimmack, "The Structure of SWB"

  • Section 1: Structure of Cognitive Well-Being: Relationships among LS and DS and within Domains of DS
  • Review basic diagram on p. 98.
  • bottom up vs. top down -- see conclusion at 107.
  • 1. Sig effect of domain importance on DS-LS correlation. (LS more sig in imp. domains like family, AND DS-DS correlation stronger with imp. domains)
  • 2. Effect of objective domain characteristics (domain importance)
  • 3.
  • problems of measurement -- "shared method variance"
  • more sophisticated model -- domain importance
  • Research Question: What could explain variance in LS besides DS?
  • Positive illusions - self-evaluative bias. note method of study. strong correlation with LS. but weak support for top down.
  • Money - income moderate predictor of DS in financial area, Financial satisfaction strong predictor of LS.
  • "direct evidence" of bottom up theory -- if people are thinking of important domains while assessing LS, then. ... 107
  • Section 2: Structure of Affective Well-Being: What explains independence of PA and NA? Are they really independent?
Hypotheses:
  • structural - imp. research by Diener, Smith, and Fujita (p. 109) verify independence, crit. Bradburn.
  • causal - maybe neuroticism drives NA and extraversion drives PA? Note Conclusion at p. 114.
  • momentary - 114: "PA and NA can be independent over extended time periods, even if they are fully dependent at each moment. "It. For example, even if love and hate were mutually exclusive at one moment in time, some individuals could experience more love and more hate over extended periods of time than others (Bradbum, 1969; Schimmack & Diener, 1997).
  • Section 3: Relationship of Cognitive and Affective Well-Being
  • high correlation, but also highly variable in studies
  • explaining the correlation: people access information about PA/NA differently in making LS judgement, also cultural variation. Correlation stronger in West, dev. countries r=.57 than East r=.22).
  • other researchers (117) rely on external factors to explain PA and then an indirect influence on LS.

SEP 18

Haidt, "The Divided Self"

  • metaphors from Plato and Buddha. Training metaphor in both. Plato's horses: rational and irrational desire. H's: elephant and rider.
  • Freud: ego, id, superego.
  • discusses a number of preliminary distinctions:
  • Mind vs. Body - gut brain. neurons all over. GI and immune system illnesses intersect with psychological conditions such as stress and depression.
  • Left vs. Right -Micharel Gazzaniga, collected evidence on split brain patients (severing corpus collasum to reduce seizures), controlled experiments with patients report of l/r brain function. split brains in everyday life... Why does this matter if you don't have a split brain??? "confabulation" - implications for our picture of csness.
  • New vs. Old -neo-cortex and frontal cortex recent - case of U VA schoolteacher in his forties who starts acting weird - massive tumor in frontal cortex. (Phineas Gage) -- moment of appreciation for the orbitofrontal cortex.
  • Controlled vs. Automatic - priming example, 13.

Two Big examples of phenomena that arise from these structures and features of the brain.

  • Failures of self control 18: Mischel and Impulse control [1] 19: Wegner on ironic processes (don't think of a white bear). point: shows automatic and controlled processes at odds.
  • Disgust 21: disgust - incest scenario -
  • 22 q. statement about rider and elephant. "We make pronouncements, vows, and resolutions, and then are surprised by our own powerlessness to carry them out. We sometimes fall into the view that we are fighting with our unconscious, our id, or our animal self. But really we are the whole thing. We are the rider, and we are the elephant. Both have their strengths and special skills."

Small Group Exercise

Take each of the four distinctions Haidt makes and speculate about the implications of this feature of our brains for happiness. Then consider the overall picture of the evolved brain and ask yourselves, "If this is the brain we're working with, then we should/shouldn't expect Happiness to be like . . . ."

SEP 23

Method Points

  • Importance of constructs in summaries of demographic research
  • Causal fallacies to recall:
  • Common Cause fallacy
  • Post hoc ergo propter hoc
  • Direction of causation
  • False Cause - catch all including: imputing a cause when there isn't one and reductive causal thinking

Argyle, Causes and Correlates of Happiness

  • Age
  • Education
  • Social Status
  • Income
  • Marriage
  • Ethnicity
  • Employment
  • Leisure
  • Religion
  • Life Events

Synopsis by major factor:

  • Age
  • The older are slightly happier, notably in positive affect. Some evidence that women become less happy with age. In assessing causality, we might need to acknowledge a cohort effect (older people are those who survive, hence not nec. representative of a sampling of all age groups). Older people are less satisfied than others with their future prospects.
  • Old people could have lower expectations, and hence their greater self-reported happiness might not be comparable to a younger person's self-reported happiness.
  • Puzzle: objective conditions are worse for old people (health, depression and loneliness!), yet they are more satisfied. (Neural degeneration has got to be on the table as a hypothesis.)
  • Education
  • The educated are slightly happier. Effect weak in US. Data suggest the education effect is greater in poorer countries. Control for income and job status effects and there is still a slight effect from education. [From personal achievement?] But income and job status account for most of the education effect.
  • Social Status
  • About twice the effect of education or age, but half of the effect is from job status. Greater effect for stratified societies. [Comment on being a professor in Italy, for example.]
  • Income
  • Average correlation of .17 across studies. See chart on p. 356 -- curvilinear, with slight upward tail at highest incomes. (intriguing)
  • Steep relation of income from poverty to material sufficiency.
  • Diener found a stronger correlation when using multiple income measures (such and GNP, purcasing power indexes, etc.)
  • Famous Myers and Diener 1996 study: "In the United States, average personal income has risen from $4,000 in 1970 to $16,000 in 1990 (in 1990 dollars), but there has been no change in average happiness or satisfaction." Some evidence that happiness is sensitive to economic downturns (Belgium), some evidence of variation in strength of effect across culture.
  • Lottery winner studies may not be a good way to test income effects since you get lots of disruptions with winning the lottery.
  • Cluster effect with income: Income comes with host of other goods: p. 358.
  • Michalo's "goal achievement gap model" p. 358: "whereby happiness is said to be due to the gap between aspirations and achievements and this gap is due to comparisons with both "average folks" and one's own past life (see figure 18.3).
Other Resources:
  • Kahneman and Deaton, "High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being"
  • Graham, et. al, "The Easterlin Paradox and Other Paradoxes: Why both sides of the Debate May be Correct"
  • Marriage
  • Average effect from meta-analysis of .14. Stronger effects for young. Does more for women than men, though stronger effect on male health.
  • Causal model: Married people have higher social well being indicators (mental and physical health). These indicators are independent factors for happiness. Marriage is a source of emotional and material support. Married people just take better care of themselves. Men might benefit from emotional support more since women provide that to male spouses more than males? (differently?)
  • Effects of marriage has a life-stage dimension to them. (figure 18.4) Having children has a small effect.
  • Reverse causation is a consideration, but hard to support since 90% of people get married.
  • Good example in this section of distinguishing between correlational data and causal discussion.
  • Ethnicity
  • Widely confirmed studies show that average happiness for US African Americans is lower than for US whites.
  • Mostly accounted for by income, education, and job status.
  • Interestingly, African American children enjoy higher self-esteem than white kids.
  • Employment
  • Studies of unemployed and retired help isolate effects.
  • Unemployed sig less happy: "The unemployed in nearly all countries are much less happy than those at work. Inglehart (1990) found that 61 percent of the unemployed were satisfied, compared with 78 percent of manual workers."
  • Causal model: income and self-esteem account for most of effect.
  • Leisure
  • Relatively strong correlation: .2 in meta-studies.
  • Leisure effects observed in lots of contexts (social relations from work, adolescent leisure habits, even a short walk. Sport and exercise include both social effects and release of endorphins.
  • Flow is a factor. Comparisons of high engagement and high apathy (tv) leisure activities.
  • TV watching as a leisure activity. Soap opera watchers!
  • Volunteer and charity work were found to generate high levels of joy, exceeded only by dancing!
  • Religion
  • The strength of religion on happiness is positive, sensitive to church attendance, strength of commitment, related to meaningfulness and sense of purpose (an independent variable). Overall modest effect, but stronger for those more involved in their church. note demographic factors.
  • Reverse causation: Are happier people more likely to be religious?
  • Causal model: Religion works through social support, increasing esteem and meaningfulness.
  • Kirpatrick 1992 study: self-reported relationship with God has similar effects as other relationships.
  • Life events and activities (especially on affect)
  • "' A study in five Eu European countries found that the main causes of joy were said to be relationships with friends, the basic pleasures of food, drink, and sex, and success experiences (Scherer etal. 1986)."..."Frequency of sexual intercourse also correlates with happiness, as does satisfaction with sex life, being in love, and frequency of interaction with spouse, but having liberal sexual attitudes has a negative relationship." "...alcohol, in modest doses, has the greatest effects on positive mood."

SEP 25

Diener and Suh, National Differences in SWB

With this article, income is once again highlighted as a factor, but now in the context of cross nation comparisons. The major issue here is, "How does culture and national grouping interact with perceptions and judgements of happiness? (Note problem of relation of national borders to tribe, ethnicity, and region.)
Methodological Difficulties:
  1. Wealth is clustered with other factors that predict H, such as right, equality, fulfillment of needs, and individualism.
  2. Transnational similarities (p. 435, in all nations most people are happy) might reflect some tendency to for judgements to be group-relative.
  3. General validity concerns about self reports are offset by research using multiple measures.
  4. Example of Russian / US student comparison, 437
  5. Are nations meaningful units of analysis? Looking at subgroups suggests yes.
After accounting for measurement and methodological issues, there are real and substantive differences in well-being across nations. While wealthier nations are generally happier, there are complexities to the causal model. National income correlates with non-economic goods such as rights, equality, fulfillment of basic needs, and individualism. These factors have effects on both SWB and income that have not been isolated.
Individualism correlates with higher reported SWB, but also higher suicide rates. Collectivists may be working with a different model of happiness or just a different attitude about its importance. (Carol Graham, Happiness Around the World, is the main succeesor research that I'm aware of. 1999 vs. 2009).
Different models for explaining cultural differences are presented:
  1. innate needs approach, Veenhoven, explains lack of growth in SWB in rich countries.
  2. theory of goal striving, SWB relative to goal pursuits, which are different between rich and poor nations.
  3. models of emotional socialization, different cultures/nations social young to affect in different ways.
  4. genetic explanations.

Typical Image for the Easterlin Paradox

Typical Image for Myers Diener / Easterlin Paradox --from Layard, Happiness

SEP 30

| Some Dates

"The Stoic Worldview"

Theology & Ontology -
  • pantheism -- theos - (pneuma) - matter.
  • ontology - All is corporeal, yet pneuma distinguishes life and force from dead matter.
Determinism and Choice - Ench #1
Pneuma, Psyche, and Hegimonikon: Importance of Hegemonikon
Model of Growth and Development toward Sagehood & Wisdom - Soul-training

Hellenistic Stoicism: Epictetus

Key Idea: To realize our rational nature (and the joy that only rational being can know), we need to adjust our thinking about our lives to what we know about reality.

Some passages that define the practical philosophy which follows from the metaphysics and this principle:

  • Notice the "re-orientation" which is recommended in #1 and #2.
  • "Some things are in our control and others are not."
  • "Confine your aversion" and understand the limits of things. (Sounds like an “aversion” retraining program based on knowledge claims.)
  • Infamous #3. Read with #7, #8, and #14, in case we’re being too subtle.
  • Something like mindfulness, #4
  • Limits of pride. Catching the mind exaggerating.:*Desire: #15,
  • Comportment in later points of the enchiridion. (Unabashedly hierarchal -- recall "mix of elements")

Small Group Prompt

1. Revisit the most difficult parts of stoic moral psychology: #3. Attachment.
2. What does the stoic have to tell us about happiness? (Look at hypostheses.)
3. +/- from the Enchiridion

Hypotheses on Stoic Happiness

1. A Happiness you deserve ---
2. Happiness is a further goal from virtue.
3. Virtue is a means to happiness. (in common with Epicurus) (#12 and #13 - If you want to improve...)
4. Stoic joy is real happiness.
5. Stoicism is a council of wisdom, not happiness.

OCT 2

Hellenistic Hedonism: Epicurus -- Letter to Menoeceus and Principal Doctrine

  • Key Idea: Pleasure is the Good. (Notice how that sets up the need for an original (relative to classical Greek philosophy) analysis of desire and pleasure.)
  • accepts reality of gods in spite of atomistic metaphysics
  • recall tetrapharmakos:
  • 1. Don't fear gods.
  • 2. Death is nothing. - note his arguments here and the similar in method to stoicism - need to live the awareness.
  • 3. What is good is easy to get.
  • 4. What is evil is easy to endure.
  • Why not worry about the Gods? (fill in from Prinicipal Doctrines)
  • Why not worry about death?
  • Classification of desire: p. 2 - natural/groundless, necessary/not necessary. tranquility, reduction in NA primary goals.
  • Plain fare (Letter); PD 8ff: analysis of pleasure -- What is Epicurus psychology of desire? What psychology of desire would be compatible with Epicurus?
  • PD 5: Relation of virtue to pleasure
  • PD 18: close to adaptation.
  • PD 25: something akin to mindfulness.
  • PD 27-8: priority of friendship.

Small group exercise on Hedonism

  • What does mean to "maximize" a pleasure? Are there natural limits to pleasures? Is desire subject to the hedonic treadmill (cf PD18)?
  • Evaluate hedonism as an overall goal for happiness.


Article on Epicurus' concept of pleasure Epicurus_on_Pleasure_and_the_Complete_Life

OCT 7

OCT 9

Note on Method

Irivne's work gives a good example of mixing two techniques: critiquing and "saving" a theory. When you "save" a theory from a criticism, you try to figure out, among other things, what the theory is really committed to and which parts of the theory are optional or could be revised.

William Irvine, Chapter 4, "Negative Visualization"

  • from p. 82: "To practice negative visualization is to contemplate the impermanence of the world around you."
  • Reasons for contemplating bad things.
  • Adaptation: wants to reverse it. "creating a desire in us for the things we already have" 67-68. Two fathers thought experiment.
  • Contemplation of our own death.
  • Sources of evidence: children, people who survive disasters (catastrophe-induced transformation), grace, unluckiness to stimulate sense of being lucky.
  • Objections: p. 81: Doesn't this heighten loss? response: the two fathers again (81)

Small Group Discussion

William Irvine, Chapter 5, "The Trichotomy of Control"

  • Some things up us, somethings aren't.
  • Internal strategy: changing ourselves. Desire not to be frustrated by future desires.
  • Irvine's critique of dichotomy: ambiguity -- total or partial control.
  • Critique of stoic claim that we have complete control of desires, and aversions. Tennis match example (88). Casino example: Epictetus wrong to include desire as something completely internal.
  • Claims: We do have complete control over goals, opinion, and character.
  • 94: response to "Stoicism is a 'withdrawl from life' philosophy" and that a Stoic would avoid attachment (96)
  • Should you want to win the tennis match, as a Stoic? internal/externally expressed goals. 96-97.
  • Problem of Stoic cosmopolitanism: Why would a stoic set goals that would threaten his/her tranquility?

Small Group Discussion

OCT 14

Darrin McMahon, Chapter 2, Perpetual Felicity

  • Note time period being covered: 0-500 ad Roman - Christian culture
  • Roman culture of happiness: propsperity, fertility, power, luck. Also images of simplicity.
  • Carpe Diem, read p. 72, note M's hypothesis: idyllic imagery a response to urban decadence and disorder.
  • Judaic culture of happiness/blessedness term: Asher -- note how terms and concepts from Hellenic/Judaic/Roman cultures are being mixed.
  • Early Christian Model of Happiness -- radical inversion of classical and Roman thought. To be happy is to walk in the way of the Lord.
  • Story of Perpetua and Felicitas (150ad). Martyrdom and Happiness.
  • Transitions in Christian thought on happiness after Early Christianity: Augustine, Pseudo-Dyonisius, Aquinas
  • Augustine: personal history, symbol of Christian critique of pagan conception, yet also assimilation of Hellenic culture. "To be happy is to be suffused jwith truth, to 'have God within the soul," to "enjoy God". Pelagian controversy. Note summary at 105.
  • John the Scot (Eriugena) 847 ad, rediscovers Pseudo-Dionysius, thought to be contemporary of Paul (who mentions a Dionysius): mystical tradition. Great example of the fusion of classical and Christian thought. Platonic, Neo-Platonic, and Christian. Mystical bliss as a higher form of happiness. (Digress).
  • Aquinas distinction between perfect and imperfect happiness. Idea of order of creation. Humans on top among mortal creatures. Fusion with Aristotlean conception of nature, to an extent. note p. 126. connects Aristotle's ideal of contemplation to Christian spirituality.

OCT 16

Go back to Diener and Suh. Connection between studying intercultural dimensions of H and history of the dominant culture of the West.

-psychology sees evolutionary thread in our evolved psychology -anthropology sees the cultural thread -- defining culture

McMahon, Chapter 3: From Heaven to Earth (Renaissance & Reformation)

  • Contemptus Mundi: 13th-15th century: characteristics.
  • Contrast with Renaissance Humanism:
  • Pico: 1463. Oration on Dignity of Man. key ideas: protean character of man. 146: still traditional model (in line with Aquinas' dist.)
  • Renaissance Neo-platonism 151: vertical path to happiness.
  • Bronzino's Allegory of Happiness -- connection to earthly happiness evident.
  • Lorenzo Valla's On Pleasure -- connecting epicureanism to a Christian life. Note biographical detail.
  • Emerging Images and Ideas: 15th-16th centuries
  • Felicitas
  • Smiles -- also, Mona Lisa, early 1500's
  • Melancholy as disease
  • Reformation
  • Martin Luther and happiness: letter, effect of grace (note throw back to Pelagians!) and at 172, summary
  • Calvin
  • Locke, late 17th century. tabula rasa, nb. 180. reassertion of happiness as driver of desire. Note enlightenment model of reasonableness of christianity here. Roughly: Reason discovers our happiness and God, as its author, wants this for us.

OCT 21

Some General Points on Yoga

  • samadhi - the goal of the spiritual practice of yoga; ecstasy, union; a mystical experience of enlightenment
  • Yoga, defined in various ways, also in relation to Vedanta narrative. dualism and monism in yogic thought.
  • 3 periods pre-classical (or Vedanta), classical (Patanjali 2nd cent. CE), and post-classical (ex. Shankara, 8th cent). Important that Patanjali's period represents a dualist approach. Purusa / Prakrati. Spirit / Nature, roughly.
  • Teacher/disciple model.
  • Yogic is infused in multiple traditions: Hindu, Buddhist, and its own. Meditative figures on coins from 3,000 bc. Rig Veda has image of a yogi who, by achieving physical control through asanas (poses) and physical austerities (fasting, meditation, etc.) achieves access to a "deeper realm" of insights about reality.
  • Yoga in Bhagvad Gita (Miller 10): Arjuna, warrior, locked in battle with his own kin. Important conversation with Krishna. (Pre-classical) Like Homeric, Yoga has a history in warrior culture and warrior ethos (duty).

Miller, Yoga: Discipline of Freedom, Introduction

  • This is an introduction to her edition / translation of Patanjali's Yoga Sutras.
  • "The aim of yoga is to eliminate the control that material nature exerts over the human spirit, to rediscover through introspective practice what the poet T. S. Eliot called the "still point of the turning world." " This is a state of perfect equilibrium and absolute spiritual calm, an interior refuge in the chaos of worldly existence. In the view of Patanjali, yogic practice can break habitual ways of thinking and acting that bind one to the corruptions of everyday life."
  • From Samkhya dualism: everything is a mix of prakrati and purusa.
  • The Three Gunas (13): Lucidity (sattva), Passion (rajas), and inertia (tamas).
  • The psychology of Patanjali's yoga: follow Miller's discussion of thought proces (17) (citta), "tyranny of uncontrollable thought," reducing thought "traces" or "seeds". goal to make thought "invulnerable" to the chaos of mental and physical stimuli. (discussion: And this is a good thing because....?)
  • In Patanjali:
  • First, there's a process of "unenlightenment" -- Purusa becomes bound to prakrati. Enlightenment is about undoing the this entanglement. (Note again connection with Buddhism, which comes much later.). q. p. 19: Ignorance...

Donna Farhi, "Cleaning up Our Act: The Four Brahmavihara

  • Five Kleshas in Patanjali:
  • 1. Avidha: Ignorance of our eternal nature
  • 2. Asmita: Seeing oneself as separate and divided from the rest ofthe world
  • 3. Raga: Attraction and attachment to impermanent things
  • 4. Dvesha: Aversion to the unpleasant
  • 5. Abhinivesha: Clinging to life because we fail to perceive the seamless continuity of consciousness, which cannot be broken by death (Yoga-Sutra 13)


  • Ashtanga Yoga -- eight fold program (from wikipedia):


Sanskrit English
Yama moral codes
Niyama self-purification and study
Asana posture
Pranayama breath control
Pratyahara sense control
Dharana intention
Dhyana meditation
Samadhi contemplation


  • The Brahmavihara are four attittudes Patanjali recommends developing:
  • 1. Friendliness toward the joyful
  • 2. Compassion for those who are sufferuig
  • 3. Celebrating the good in others
  • 4. Remaining impartial to the faults and imperfections of others(Yoga-Sutra 1.33)
  • Note Fahri's more "social" focus.
  • Follow, in some detail, her discussion of each Brahmavihara. Importance of cultivating empathy

Additional Quote on Goal of Yoga

from T. S. Rumani, " Samkhya-Yoga," Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy

Introduction to Meditation Practicum

We'll save 10 minutes at the end of class for those interested in hearing about the meditation practicum.

OCT 23

OCT 28

OCT 30

NOV 4

NOV 6

NOV 11

NOV 13

NOV 18

NOV 20

NOV 25

NOV 27

DEC 2

DEC 4

DEC 9

DEC 11