Death and Happiness Class

From Alfino
Revision as of 16:59, 17 April 2007 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Lecture Notes: Death and Happiness Class, April 17, 2007

Introduction

  • The Philosophy Bird,
  • St. Jerome, and
  • UVA Killings

Some Initial Distinctions

  1. Distinctions among: Thinking about (preparing for) your own death, Responding to the death of others, helping others with their experience of death (their own or others). Critical Quesitons: Which way to does the inference go? from our own understanding of death to the others, right?
  1. Distinct yet overlapping concerns in different religious traditions treatment of death: 1) Islam and Christian; 2)Tibetan Buddhist. (Montaigne's point about the need to conquer death.)
  1. Distinction between cognitive knowledge of death and experience knowledge, felt responses. Critical Question: Are our responses to death trainable? What is the goal of such traning? Does it come with the pursuit of wisdom?

Montaigne, That to Study Philosophy is to Learn to Die

To the Best of Our Knowledge

Dave Meyers, psychologist: Durability bias. We're bad at predicting our future happiness: tenure study, physical tragedies, (cancer patients), mentions his own impending hearing loss (a kind of death).