2008 Fall Critical Thinking Research Topic: Affirmative Action

From Alfino
Revision as of 02:07, 6 November 2008 by Student (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Please add findings below following the template on the Fall 2008 Critical Thinking Research Topics page.

Group members should also work to keep the page well organized. -Alfino


Affirmative-action arguments reveal divided Supreme Court

Citation Allen Pusey. "Affirmative-action arguments reveal divided Supreme Court." (n.d.). TOPICsearch. EBSCO. [Library name], [City], [State abbreviation]. 5 Nov. 2008 <http://proxy.foley.gonzaga.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tth&AN=2W72106875252&site=ehost-live>.

Summary: This article gives key information that will help our group in understanding how this "Michigan" court case regarding affirmative-action came about. It talks about both the viewpopints of the students as well as the viewpoints of the university.


"Race, because of the Constitution, should never be a factor," Kolbo said.

Maureen Mahoney defended the Michigan law school admissions process as being highly individualized. She said race was only one of many factors-such as job experience, socioeconomic status and leadership potential-used to evaluate applicants to the school. She said the law school, rated as one of the nation's best, admits only qualified students and has no interest in admitting a minority who might not succeed.

It would be great if someone would research the California v. Bakke case as it was referenced as the last impactful affirmative-action case previous to the Michigan case.

Matt Theisen

Retrieved from "http://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php?title=2008_Fall_Critical_Thinking_Research_Topic:_Affirmative_Action&oldid=4902"