Jack Balkin, "A Body of Inquiries"

From Alfino
Revision as of 18:11, 2 February 2009 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Return to Critical Thinking

Jack Balkin, "A Body of Inquiries"

GC: We should have a truth commission and institutional reforms rather than a criminal investigation of high ranking Bush administration officials who might have approved torture policies and illegal treatment of detainees.

Three reasons for truth commissions:

IC: We should have a truth commission to document abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.
P1: Truth commissions would show our committment to human rights.
P2: Truth commissions would counteract the tendency toward secret laws.
P3: Truth commissions would create a public record of the misconduct.
IC: The South African model for truth and reconciliation is not the right one for us.
P1: South Africa's experience of apartheid involved human right violations against the population and needed to reconcile tensions between groups and among individuals.
P2: Our experience with the torture cases does not involve these features.


IC: We should not pursue criminal prosecution of abuses of power by high ranking Bush administration officials.
IIC: The barriers to prosecution are too great.
P1: Bush officials used the Justice Department's legal advice so they might be able to claim immunity.
P2: Bush officials might be able to claim immunity from the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
IC: We should reform the Justice Department and military rules and policies related to torture and immunity.
P1: