2009 Fall Proseminar Student Work
If I emailed you to post your reconstruction, this is the place to do it. Please follow the pattern below.
Reconstructions of Singer Chapter
Recon #1
Singer’s general claim seems to be that the structure of distinctly separate nations within the world causes one’s view of ethics and morality to be faulty and incomplete. He supports this claim with four major arguments.
The first claim is that nationalism causes unnecessary loss of life through inaction. Morality which emphasizes the importance of one’s own citizens stops countries from acting in a manner that would save many lives in other countries because it would risk some lives of its own citizens. This is exemplified by the events in Rwanda and Kosovo, in which professional soldiers from other countries could have saved many lives with small amounts of casualties.
Singer’s second argument is that improper actions between nations causes war and excessive loss of life. As an example, he states that the First World War began because one nation asked too much of another and therefore attributes the nine million deaths to the structure of sovereign nations. Essentially, a morality based on nationalism is responsible for the First World War, according to Singer.
The final major rationale that Singer provides for why the current structure of sovereign states is inadequate is how modern globalization has changed the world. He cites terrorism and advances in communication as events which have created an integrated world community that goes beyond borders. Singer argues that this interconnectedness requires that we broaden the way we think ethically from one society or country to one world. SWilliams2 06:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Recon #2
In his first chapter of One World entitled “A Changing World,” Peter Singer’s main point is rather self-evident: the state of the world was we know it is changing. However, more specifically this change is being experienced in the political landscape of the world. At the end of the chapter he uses this determination to establish the relevancy of his book, because for a nation to ignore adoption of a “global ethical viewpoint” is not only immoral but also a grave threat to its own security (13). However, for the purposes of this first chapter of the book, three different arguments (perhaps better characterized as examples and therefore representative of inductive reasoning from specifics to a generalization) are presented to affirm the thesis that the world of nation-states is in fact altering greatly.
The first argument encountered is that increased interconnectedness of the global community has made unequivocal nation-first attitudes appear anachronistic. Singer provides two examples in making this argument. First, since global warming is an issue the affects all nations, President George W. Bush is incorrect to adopt a nation-first stance in protecting the American economy before a discussion on the global issue at hand; he does not lend America to being a good member of the global community, let alone a leader in it. Another example is that of limited risk of the lives of soldiers to intervene for humanitarian purposes, as seen in the Balkans and Kosovo.
The second argument is also related to the interconnectedness of nations across the globe, namely that the concept of national sovereignty is undergoing an upheaval. He compares the actions of Austria-Hungary leading up to the First World War with that of the United States in its conflict in Afghanistan. In both cases, the prosecuting nations made forcible requests of a sovereign nation to hand over individuals responsible for an act of terrorism. History has condemned Austria-Hungary, but the actions of the U.S have been deemed justified.
Finally, Singer points to the influential role of technology. He identifies it as a means of supporting international nongovernmental entities such as transnational corporations and the World Trade Organization. The increased power and influence of these organizations that operate beyond the bounds of any one national government has great ramifications on the role of a nation in self-direction and economic regulation. One such example is Thomas Friedman’s “Golden Straitjacket.”
Recon #3
I think the general conclusion in chapter one of Peter Singer’s “One World” is that: we are in need of a new global ethic. Singer supports this conclusion by first giving examples of how national leaders and heads of state have lived out the contemporary social ethic in which nation states primarily pursue their own interests and why it is morally flawed. He then explains how globalization has made the world population more interdependent than ever before and has thus given us a reason and basis for a new global ethics.
He starts out by stating that scientists have piled up the evidence that green house gases currently being emitted will put millions of lives in danger. Yet then President George Bush refused to take any action that would harm the American economy. Congress following suit rejects to raise fuel efficiency standards while SUV sales are on the rise. Another example is how the Clinton administration refused to intervene in Bosnia to reduce civilian casualties that were a result of Serb “ethnic cleansing” because it was not worth the life of one single American soldier. Finally, in Kosovo where intervention took place the invasion was restricted to aerial bombing in which NATO forces suffered no casualties while Serb Kosovo and Chinese civilians died as a result of the bombing.
Singer points out that “the value of the life of an innocent human being does not vary according to nationality. Yet in the examples above we see how one group of human beings is given less value in favor of another and this seems inherently immoral. Singer then points out that this is the way it has always been done and it is the requirement of national leaders to give partiality to their own citizens. However Singer then suggests that this era of globalization and the development of technology and communications may have created a world audience in which would serve as a basis for a new global ethic.
An example of this is what Tom Friedman calls the “Golden Straight jacket.” The Golden Straight jacket is a set of policies that include removing restrictions of foreign investment, shrinking bureaucracies and giving the private sector more freedom. If a country takes off the straight jacket or refuses to put it on it would lose investment capital that keeps their country growing. In this case when neither government nor opposition refuses to take off the straight jacket the major political differences become much more minor, thus as Singer points out “the growth of the global economy itself marks a decline in the power of a nation state.” The interdependence of the global society and its ability to link the world’s population together, according to Singer, gives us the basis for a new global ethic.
