Difference between revisions of "DEC 8"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==28: DEC 8== ===Reviewing Research=== :*'''1. Groups''' and research on promotion of civil discourse. :*Lots of groups focused on specific issues, like bias, civics curric...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==28: DEC 8==
+
==29: DEC 8==
  
===Reviewing Research===
+
===Assigned===
  
:*'''1. Groups''' and research on promotion of civil discourse.
+
:*Let's use our last class to go over course resources on PP2 and reflect a bit on morality.
 +
:*Try to watch some of the prison videos, etc. and do your own searches (and send me links) 
  
:*Lots of groups focused on specific issues, like bias, civics curriculum, campaign finance reform, bipartisan think tanks and issue based efforts.   
+
:*Search results on prisons and punishment:
 +
::*See spreadsheet in Main Shared Folder.   
 +
::*Also some here: [[Search results on prisons and punishment - FALL 2022 Ethics]]
  
:*A couple that focus specifically polarization and civil discourse
+
:*A couple to share now:
 +
::*The Atlantic, data visualization on incarceration of African Americans [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u51_pzax4M0]
 +
::*Data visualization on mass incarceration. [https://mkorostoff.github.io/incarceration-in-real-numbers/]
 +
::*"Comparing Prisons Around the World" Be Amazed. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIoJCGUu1pY]
  
::*[https://https://americanpublicsquare.org/ American Public Square]
+
:*Susan Blackmore, "Living Without Free Will" (recommended)
  
::*[https://bringit2thetable.org/ Bring it to the Table] — looks very interesting.  A Documentary associated with it. 
+
===In-class===
  
::*[https://civilpolitics.org Civil Politics] - a group that Jonathan Haidt and Ravi Iyer at NYU.  Drill down on "two recommendations".
+
:*Short talk, “From Ethics to Happiness: Turning up the Volume on Values"
  
::*[https://kitchentable.org Kitchen Table Democracy] -  
+
===Blackmore - Living Without Free Will===
  
:*Fostering Civil Discourse: How Do We Talk About Issues That Matter? This journal, published by Facing History and Ourselves, was very fascinating in regards to the authors opinions on how individuals can foster civil discourse and be equipped for these types of conversations. I thought that the idea mentioned in this article that these types of conversations are not difficult and society labels them but are just unpracticed. Lastly, I enjoyed that this journal talked about the importance of first examining our own beliefs and understanding that we do not have a neutral lens and must take ownership of our beliefs and ideas.  https://www.facinghistory.org/sites/default/files/publications/Fostering_Civil_Discourse_2020_0.pdf
+
:*Thesis: Free will is an unnecessary illusion that you might be better off getting over. SB grants that many find this an impossible view.
  
:*The Enemy's Gaze We talked a little bit earlier in the course about how trying to put yourself in someone else's shoes can be very helpful in understanding and humanizes people with opposing views. This article discusses a study that proves this. Using virtual reality that put participants in the environment/situation of a person with opposing political beliefs, softened their hostility toward that opposing group even months after the VR experiment was over. I found it interesting because it shows that even something as simple as VR technology can improve the heated political climate we're in now. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=14&sid=953e1de9-8629-4052-a6af-cfa6a9331f6c%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=138560269&db=a9h
+
:*Cites Wegner (2002): research suggesting that the feeling of agency ("I did it!") might be "post-hoc" attribution.
  
 +
:*”Inner self is illusion.” Illusion can mean something that isn’t there or something that isn’t what it seems.  SB means the latter.
  
 +
:*Blackmore agrees with Dennett's analysis (but thinks his book should be called "Choice Evolves"), but thinks FW is an illusion.  Dennett says “free will worth having” is the kind he describes in ''Freedom Evolves''. 
  
:*'''2. Politics and voting''' - Lots of good research articles on how and why the US is polarized.
+
:*She considers two possibilities: "Living 'as if'" and "Rejecting the Illusion" - favors the latter.
  
:*What are the Solutions to Political Polarization? This article did a great job of first identifying what causes political polarization and how to solve the problems it creates. While describing what drives political polarization, the article points out that the moral values involved in policies is a key reason, while stating that the free-will vs determinism argument is one of the values that is debated. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/what_are_the_solutions_to_political_polarization
+
:*'''Living "as if"'''
  
:*A Case for Proportional Voting This article is written from the perspective of a conservative that believes the Republican Party doesn't adequately represent conservative values anymore. He's calling for proportional or preferential voting, in which voters can either rank candidates in order of preference or create nonpartisan primaries in which the top two finishers are nominated for the general election, irregardless of their party. It's his belief that this would create a more representative government. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-case-for-proportional-voting
+
::*Wegner quote:  "virtual agency" is part of a useful mental accounting system. But virtual agency is an illusion created by our brains.
 +
::*Patricia Churchland: It's a "user illusion" that you make an uninfluenced, self-conscious choice.
 +
::*"Illusionism" can be defended.  If you believe bad consequences follow from giving it up....
 +
::*Criminal Justice system would be fairer without the illusion of FW.  No retribution. 
  
:*Why Are There Political Parties? This article breakdown where political parties came from and why we have them. I enjoy that this article addresses ways that the democratic and republican party are similar. The article also talks about how people also will vote based on their views of particular issues rather than their political party affiliation. https://wonderopolis.org/wonder/why-are-there-political-parties
+
::*Stronger position: You can't get rid of the illusion even if you wanted to. "I'm determined to believe in FW."
  
:*Eight Ways Ranked Choice Voting Can Improve Voting and Elections This article contained a list of reasons as to why ranked choice voting would improve our political process and decrease political polarization. I personally am an advocate for ranked choice voting and this contained some ideas that I had never encountered before that help to support the position. https://campaignlegal.org/update/eight-ways-ranked-choice-voting-can-improve-voting-and-elections
+
:*'''"Rejecting the Illusion"''' -
 +
::*166: "sitting by the fire" example
 +
::*William James - getting out of bed on cold morning.  Analyze that feeling of "indecision".
 +
::*Blackmore 167: going out on a cold night. "...not because "i" made the decision of my own free will. It is because this is the decision that the whole universe came up with for this person under those circumstances."
  
 +
::*Thought experiment to her students: "But if I don't have free will why would I get up in the morning? Why would I do anything?"  Go ahead. Try it!
  
:*'''3. Communications theory and approaches to conflict'''
+
::*Blackmore thinks of consciousness more as events than a place in your head where things "enter into conscious awareness".  Likewise, maybe, with free will. [Possible criticism: Just because it would be mistaken to believe in the homunculus, it doesn't mean that there are no neural processes that imitate some of it's less exotic functions (like updating us by making this conscious to us - "Oh right, I have a paper to write.").  [Arguably, that’s your evolved, “user illusion” homunculus talking.]
  
::*[https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/four-negotiation-strategies-for-resolving-values-based-disputes/ Four Negotiation strategies for resolving values based disputes]
+
::*169: Some of the exercises she asks her students to do. "Am I conscious now?"  Sometimes primes them to be more conscious. (Related to mindfulness).
  
::*Sample of type of discussion in reconcilation program research [https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL2191408&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
:*'''Morality and Responsibility'''
]
+
::*You might think that you would have more regrets giving up FW, but no. 
 +
::*Wegner: knowing its an illusion gives him a sense of peace. “There are a whole lot of things that I don’t have to worry about controlling because I know that I’m just a little window on a lovely machines that’s doing lots of things.
  
:*How to Deal With 'Values Conflict' by Russ Harris This resource provides ways to with value conflicts. First part of this article is discussing the difference between values, life domains and goals which often get confused with values. I especially like how part two and three give steps to dictating what the value conflicts are and ways to deal with the dilemma at hand. https://www.actmindfully.com.au/upimages/How_to_deal_with_values_conflicts_-_Russ_Harris.pdf
+
::*Conversation with her Dad.  Maybe FW (or belief in it) makes us "want to be good"  (recall Henrich). But we’re not wicked, in general. (“I’m determined to improve the future!”). Her answer, 173: Ultimately we’re designed by evolution to benefit from being good.
  
 +
::*SB's point: All of your motivations to be good (self-interest, reputation, altruism) will still be there after you give up FW. 
  
:*How Should Leaders Address Workplace Values Conflicts? This article talks about different conflicts that could occur in the workplace and how leaders should resolve these issues. One major issue that is common among the workplace is the use of new technology vs traditional ways. The article finishes off by saying "doing nothing is not an option" then talks about how leaders need to deal with conflicts with values. https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2017/05/09/leaders-address-workplace-values-conflicts/
+
:*'''Paying Attention'''
 +
::*In meditation, a great deal of "quieting the mind" is about getting the self to shut up so you can pay attention to the mind.
  
:*Embodied conflict: The neural basis of conflict and communication. This source explains the concepts of conflict and communication in terms of neural structures and reactions in the brain. This is interesting because it takes on a scientific view rather than a social one https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-42563-000&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
===Small group===
  
:*Conflict Management: Difficult Conversations with Difficult People This research shows conflict management strategies that have been proven to reduce conflict in the workplace, classes, etc. Training in conflict management increases teamwork, productivity and efficiency. A list of steps are given... for example, step 1 is to determine whether the conflict is even worth addressing. Most often, it is not. Step 2, analyze your own position. Gather all the information you can about your position and understand arguments against it before you engage in an argument. Steps go on and on, but I think workplaces should consider training their employees in this area. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835442/
+
:*Consider Susan Blackmore’s discussion.  How far does her advice go for you?
 +
::*I’m holding out for Free Will.  It doesn’t feel like a user illusion.
 +
::*I’ll do the “as if” (like Wegner). It’s a useful user illusion and it works better if you believe in it. Or, it would be dangerous to give up. Or both.  
 +
::*Some of the benefits of “living without free will” look promising, but I’m not sure. CJ fairness. Appreciation of my nature. That we are designed to benefit from being good.  
 +
::*Damn straight. I’m giving up free will today!
  
:*Active Non-violence as Conflict Resolution This article covers two non-violent ways of conflict resolution, one being individual nonviolent communication and the other being passive resistance. It then relates the two in an attempt to find a solution to successfully resolving conflict. I like that the article is making a point of nonviolence and is analyzing past events rather than  just theories. https://gonzaga.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL2166571&site=ehost-live&scope=site
+
===Concluding Course Comments===
  
:*'''Miscellaneous / Unclassified'''
+
:*Review of [[Major Ethics Course Questions]]
  
:*The partisan brain: cognitive study suggests people on the left and right are more similar than they think This resource discusses cognitive rigidity and whether or not it is possible to combat this in a partisan brain. I liked this article because it addressed the idea of mental flexibility and its potential to help people switch between different styles of thinking. It's interesting to think that psychological exercises could help to prevent such an extremist society and change the partisan attitude that have become so socially acceptable. https://theconversation.com/the-partisan-brain-cognitive-study-suggests-people-on-the-left-and-right-are-more-similar-than-they-think-123578
+
:*Philosophical Method and Knowledge
 +
 
 +
:*Finally, “How can I use my profound knowledge of morality to improve the world?” (Or, What can I do now that I couldn’t do (as well) 15 weeks ago?)
 +
 
 +
:*Last reminder: What is Morality? What are Values? How are they enforced?
 +
 
 +
::*Morality is about problems that can be addressed by values.
 +
::*Values are expectations of others to think, speak, feel, and act in particular ways (and sometimes to refrain from thinking, speaking, etc. in particular ways).  
 +
::*We enforce values in social life by many means, from conversation about expectations, gossip about others’ behavior, and, of course, the justice system.
 +
 
 +
::*In culture, values play out dynamically.  Cooperation is not guaranteed.  Compliance with social contracts is not guaranteed (US Jan 6. Today, Peru and Germany.). We have to speak up for values and show moral concern.  Withdrawing from values talk weakens them.
 +
 
 +
:*The Basic Evo-Morality question: What are (fitness) challenges that my country and the global face?  (My list!)
 +
 
 +
:*To the extent that values can help with those problems, how can I contribute?
 +
 
 +
::*Ideology v Pragmatism about outcomes.  (Mention just survey.). Focus on problem solving v ideology. Approach politics as “team of rivals” rather than “
 +
::*Use your knowledge about the persistence of difference (pol and moral orientation) to build cooperative relationships across differences.  Avoid negative polarization and call it out.  Tucker Carlson and Chris Hayes are not enlightened in this regard.
 +
::*On the interpersonal level - Turn up the volume on positive and reinforcing behaviors, not only with your friends and family. Go to the empathy gym. Model your value ideals.

Latest revision as of 21:03, 8 December 2022

29: DEC 8

Assigned

  • Let's use our last class to go over course resources on PP2 and reflect a bit on morality.
  • Try to watch some of the prison videos, etc. and do your own searches (and send me links)
  • Search results on prisons and punishment:
  • A couple to share now:
  • The Atlantic, data visualization on incarceration of African Americans [1]
  • Data visualization on mass incarceration. [2]
  • "Comparing Prisons Around the World" Be Amazed. [3]
  • Susan Blackmore, "Living Without Free Will" (recommended)

In-class

  • Short talk, “From Ethics to Happiness: Turning up the Volume on Values"

Blackmore - Living Without Free Will

  • Thesis: Free will is an unnecessary illusion that you might be better off getting over. SB grants that many find this an impossible view.
  • Cites Wegner (2002): research suggesting that the feeling of agency ("I did it!") might be "post-hoc" attribution.
  • ”Inner self is illusion.” Illusion can mean something that isn’t there or something that isn’t what it seems. SB means the latter.
  • Blackmore agrees with Dennett's analysis (but thinks his book should be called "Choice Evolves"), but thinks FW is an illusion. Dennett says “free will worth having” is the kind he describes in Freedom Evolves.
  • She considers two possibilities: "Living 'as if'" and "Rejecting the Illusion" - favors the latter.
  • Living "as if"
  • Wegner quote: "virtual agency" is part of a useful mental accounting system. But virtual agency is an illusion created by our brains.
  • Patricia Churchland: It's a "user illusion" that you make an uninfluenced, self-conscious choice.
  • "Illusionism" can be defended. If you believe bad consequences follow from giving it up....
  • Criminal Justice system would be fairer without the illusion of FW. No retribution.
  • Stronger position: You can't get rid of the illusion even if you wanted to. "I'm determined to believe in FW."
  • "Rejecting the Illusion" -
  • 166: "sitting by the fire" example
  • William James - getting out of bed on cold morning. Analyze that feeling of "indecision".
  • Blackmore 167: going out on a cold night. "...not because "i" made the decision of my own free will. It is because this is the decision that the whole universe came up with for this person under those circumstances."
  • Thought experiment to her students: "But if I don't have free will why would I get up in the morning? Why would I do anything?" Go ahead. Try it!
  • Blackmore thinks of consciousness more as events than a place in your head where things "enter into conscious awareness". Likewise, maybe, with free will. [Possible criticism: Just because it would be mistaken to believe in the homunculus, it doesn't mean that there are no neural processes that imitate some of it's less exotic functions (like updating us by making this conscious to us - "Oh right, I have a paper to write."). [Arguably, that’s your evolved, “user illusion” homunculus talking.]
  • 169: Some of the exercises she asks her students to do. "Am I conscious now?" Sometimes primes them to be more conscious. (Related to mindfulness).
  • Morality and Responsibility
  • You might think that you would have more regrets giving up FW, but no.
  • Wegner: knowing its an illusion gives him a sense of peace. “There are a whole lot of things that I don’t have to worry about controlling because I know that I’m just a little window on a lovely machines that’s doing lots of things.”
  • Conversation with her Dad. Maybe FW (or belief in it) makes us "want to be good" (recall Henrich). But we’re not wicked, in general. (“I’m determined to improve the future!”). Her answer, 173: Ultimately we’re designed by evolution to benefit from being good.
  • SB's point: All of your motivations to be good (self-interest, reputation, altruism) will still be there after you give up FW.
  • Paying Attention
  • In meditation, a great deal of "quieting the mind" is about getting the self to shut up so you can pay attention to the mind.

Small group

  • Consider Susan Blackmore’s discussion. How far does her advice go for you?
  • I’m holding out for Free Will. It doesn’t feel like a user illusion.
  • I’ll do the “as if” (like Wegner). It’s a useful user illusion and it works better if you believe in it. Or, it would be dangerous to give up. Or both.
  • Some of the benefits of “living without free will” look promising, but I’m not sure. CJ fairness. Appreciation of my nature. That we are designed to benefit from being good.
  • Damn straight. I’m giving up free will today!

Concluding Course Comments

  • Philosophical Method and Knowledge
  • Finally, “How can I use my profound knowledge of morality to improve the world?” (Or, What can I do now that I couldn’t do (as well) 15 weeks ago?)
  • Last reminder: What is Morality? What are Values? How are they enforced?
  • Morality is about problems that can be addressed by values.
  • Values are expectations of others to think, speak, feel, and act in particular ways (and sometimes to refrain from thinking, speaking, etc. in particular ways).
  • We enforce values in social life by many means, from conversation about expectations, gossip about others’ behavior, and, of course, the justice system.
  • In culture, values play out dynamically. Cooperation is not guaranteed. Compliance with social contracts is not guaranteed (US Jan 6. Today, Peru and Germany.). We have to speak up for values and show moral concern. Withdrawing from values talk weakens them.
  • The Basic Evo-Morality question: What are (fitness) challenges that my country and the global face? (My list!)
  • To the extent that values can help with those problems, how can I contribute?
  • Ideology v Pragmatism about outcomes. (Mention just survey.). Focus on problem solving v ideology. Approach politics as “team of rivals” rather than “
  • Use your knowledge about the persistence of difference (pol and moral orientation) to build cooperative relationships across differences. Avoid negative polarization and call it out. Tucker Carlson and Chris Hayes are not enlightened in this regard.
  • On the interpersonal level - Turn up the volume on positive and reinforcing behaviors, not only with your friends and family. Go to the empathy gym. Model your value ideals.