Difference between revisions of "APR 14"

From Alfino
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==26: APR 14==
+
==22. APR 14==
  
===Assigned===
+
===Assigned Work===
  
:*Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will (580-613)  (Part One 580-598)
+
:*van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles" - externalities in the production of UPF.
  
===Sapolsky, Chapter 16: Biology, the Criminal Justice System, and (Oh, Why Not?) Free Will===
+
===In Class===
  
:*Discusses professional interaction between biologists and legal scholars that may have started “neurolaw”. Conferences, Innocence Project (350 exonerated, 20 from death row). Sapolsky focusing on narrow range of topics, exclusions p. 582.( science in courtroom, min IQ for death sentence, cognitive bias in jurors, cognitive privacy)
+
:*Documentary reports
  
:*Cites his liberal credentials, but claims he’s not taking a liberal stance. 
+
===van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles"===
  
:*583: Historic example of scientific evidence disrupting criteria for guilt in witches trials, mid-16th centuryOlder women might not be able to cryLiberals, is S’s view, focus on making small adjustments (not prosecuting older women with failing tear ducts), but he’s going big:
+
:*Pringles case.  UPF avoiding snack tax.  In pringles case, ironically by claiming not much potato content.  Pringles eventually loses the caseVery contorted argumentsTax evasion is a kind of externality.
  
:*Radical claim: Current criminal justice system needs to be replaced. (Must be said, this is also a liberal reform.)
+
:*UPFs and climate. Additional fossil fuel inputs, inefficiency of UPF foods for meat production (feed ratio).
  
:*'''Three Perspectives on Free Will'''
+
:*UPS and monoculture agriculture - Palm Oil particularly problematic.  258. 
  
::*1. Complete free will; 2. No free will; 3. Somewhere in between.
+
:*Carbon footprint of animal foods. 260 - 100g of beef 25kg of carbon dioxide / Beans .65kg.
  
::*No one now disputes that we sometimes are not free (epilepsy example).  Problem is how to think about itSometimes it’s not “him” but “his disease”Sapolsky will be critical of the idea that you can make this separation.
+
:*Soy as animal food is relatively efficient feed ratio, but requires alot of processing261To speed weight gain, we feed animals UPF feed.
  
::*Yet medieval europe tried animals for guilt(Sounds weirder than it isJust imagine it's about the act, not criminal intent.)  Ok, it's still pretty weird...  Inference: We don’t have complete conscious control of our actions.   
+
:*Soy and Amazon rainforest depletionWater depletionAmazon goes from carbon sink to carbon producer.   
  
:*'''Drawing Lines in the Sand''' 586
+
:*Antibiotic use in animal production may be contributing to anti-biotic resistance. 
  
::*S Endorses a broad '''compatibilism''' =  '''Free will is compatible with determinism.'''. 
+
:*UPF and plastic packaging.
::*But most people talk like “libertarian dualists”, what he calls “mitigated free will”.  Sapolsky will try to show that this view doesn’t hold up, in part because it depends up arbitrary use of a “homonculus” to explain things.
 
  
::*1842: M’Naghten.  Rule at 587.  Mentally ill murderer.  Many objected to his not being found guilty.  John Hinckley.  Again, many objected. Law passed restricting insanity defense in federal crimes. 
+
===In-Class===
  
::*"Mitigated free will" homunculus view: (read at 588. Funny, but that is how many people think.) We all more or less think this way and then the problem of responsibility comes down to figuring out what to expect from the homunculus.  Note his humorous/sarcastic description of it.  What is it capable of or should have been capable of.  This is our "folk psychology" of free will.
+
:*SCP: Short Critical Paper on the Ethics of Eating - Assigned
  
:*'''Age, Maturity of Groups, Maturity of Individuals'''
+
===Winders and Ransom, "Introduction to the Global Meat Industry"  ===
  
::*2005 case Roper v. Simmons.  Age limit of 18 on executions and life terms.  Follows debates on this. 590. 
+
:*'''Intro'''
::*2010 and 2012 cases on rehab for juvies. '''age related bounds on free will''' (in the justice system).
 
  
::*''Brain damage to rationality as a criterion''
+
::*major concerns and questions: expansion of global meat industry makes several problems worse: environmental damage, effects on climate change, clean water, food insecurity, world hunger, consumer health, workers' rights and well-being, and (not least of all) the treatment of animals. 
::*Morse: critic of neuroscience in courtroom, but allows for ”grossly impaired rationality”. [Note: The law is mostly interested in "rationality" not free will.]
+
::*Note: the ethical case against meat is not limited to the problem of animal ethics.  Some of the non-animal ethics problems can be ameliorated by not participating in the industrial supply chain. 
 +
::*Paradoxically, increased meat production can create food insecurity for some. 2.  
  
::*Some views Sapolsky finds hard to accept:  
+
::*Global meat industry is a product of gov't and industry collaborating:  
:::*Gazzaniga’s view: FW is an illusion, but we should still punish. Responsibility is a social level concern.  (This view makes more sense than Sapolsky sees.)
+
::*Overproduces food animals relative to population.  
:::*Deliberate actions are "free" - doesn't make sense of brain processes.
+
::*Creates dangers for environment and workers. (esp. from hyperslaughter)
  
::*''Time course of decision making.''
+
:*'''Global Meat Industry, 1960-2016'''
  
::*Disputes about the maturity of adolescents: APA has spoken both ways in court: not mature enough for criminal resp., but mature enough to make an abortion decisionMight be contradictory unless you think that the immaturity affects impulse control more. 
+
::*Per capita consumption doubled from 1960 to 2016: 20kg/person/year to 40.  Mostly in Global North. 
 +
::*US has highest consumption by this data: 113.9kg/person/year (250 pounds a year! 4.8 pounds a week.)
 +
::*45 million metric tons (MMT) to 259 MMT.
 +
::*$65 billion to about $400 billion. 
 +
::*US meat exports '60 to '15 -- 2.6 MMT to 27 MMT -- We're not doing this to feed us?
 +
::*Note meat consumption increases occurred while population was also increasing. Population increase 1960-2016 3 billion to 7.4.   
  
::*''Causation and Compulsion''
+
::*Note that US has declined from peak consumption, also some Europeans, esp Denmark, Netherlands, and French. 
 +
::*Increases in numbers of animals: 270% for pigs and 900% for chickens. Over 1.4 billion cows and pigs.
  
:::*You might defend mitigated FW by distinguishing causation from compulsion: not everything that causes us to act is a compulsion, but for some, it is.
+
::*Meat exports: most from global north.  Asian and emerging industrial countries big importers.  ('''Meat consumption follows wealth increases'''.) p. 12: increases in China, for example, 3.5kg to 57.6kg, Mexico almost tripled, Russia doubled.  
  
::*Works through example of schizophrenic hearing voicesNot all cases would be compulsion. "If your friend suggests that you mug someone, the law expects you to resist, even if it's an imaginary friend in your head." On the other hand, some say that act might be “caused” by this voice“Thus, in this view even a sensible homunculus can lose it and agree to virtually anything, just to get the hellhounds and trombones to stop.” 593
+
:*'''How did global meat grow so much?'''
 +
::*1. Increases in feed grain productionNow more global feed grain production than food grain production (rice and wheat). Along with ag tech to put more land into production, GE corn and soybeans increased yields.
 +
::*2. Trade policies - WTO - promotes free trade agreements for meat import/export. 
 +
::*3. increased corporate concentrationboth production and processing.
 +
::*Concentration of processing produced scaling up.  Read from p. 15.  (Recall Maureen Ogle's history chapter.)
  
::*''Starting a behavior vs. halting it.''  
+
::*former communist countries became markets.
::*Libet experiment, 1980s, EEG disclosure of “readiness potential” — activity measured before conscious awareness of will.  .5 second delay might just be artifact of experiment design.  Time it takes to interpret the clock. Libet says maybe the lag time is the time you have to veto the action your body is preparing you for (“free won’t”)
+
 +
:*'''Consequences of global meat for consideration'''
 +
::*1. Corporate concentration - Global food corporations exert significant power over farmers and national governments. Many poor countries with food insecurity export meat to wealthier countries.   
 +
::*2. Tension bt. cheap meat and food insecurity - Smallholder meat production in decline from competition.
 +
::*3. Social and environmental injustice. Many environmental effects of meat production fall disproportionately on poor countries and poor within rich countries.
  
::*Sapolsky’s view is that these debates reflect a consensus about the interaction of biology and free will, whatever that is. 
+
===SCP: Ethics of Eating Animals===
  
::*''”You must be smart” vs. “You must have worked so hard”''
+
:*'''Stage 1''': Please write an 800-1000 word essay on the following prompt by '''Wednesday, April 24, 2023, 11:59pm.'''
 +
::*Topic: Our work on ethical issues in eating and food systems has focused on two kinds of problems: First, are there compelling reasons to refrain from eating some or all animals?  Second, does the global industrial food system violate ethical norms? Is this a reason for avoiding specific foods or companies? In this essay, address both of these issues, drawing on course readings and expressing your own opinion.  Do either of these ethical problem areas have an impact on your personal food practices?
  
::*research of Carol Dweck, 90s, saying that a kid worked hard to get a result increases motivation.   
+
:*'''Advice about collaboration''': Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate.  I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, '''verbally'''.  Collaboration  is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class.  The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer.  Keep it verbal.  Generate your own examples.   
  
::*596: we tend to assign aptitude to biology and effort and resisting impulse to free will.  Sapolsky seems very skeptical that we can justify assigning character (impulse control anyway) to non-biological factors (fairy dust).  Read at 598. 
+
:*Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. '''You will lose points''' if you do not follow these instructions:
  
:*Conclusions: “worked hard/must be smart” are equally grounded in our physical nature.
+
::# To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [[https://wiki.gonzaga.edu/alfino/index.php/Removing_your_name_from_a_Word_file click here]].
 +
::# Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph. 
 +
::# '''Do not put your name in the file or filename'''.  You may put your student ID number in the file, but '''not in the filename'''. Save your file for this assignment with the name: FoodEthics.
 +
::# To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#3: Food Ethics" dropbox.
 +
::# If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) '''before''' the deadline or you will lose points.  
  
::*Some evidence that pedophilia is not freely chosen or easily resisted. 
+
:*'''Stage 2''': I will grade and briefly comment on your essays.
 
 
::*Chart showing how we divide things between biology and “homuncular grit”. — Long list of ways out biology influence the items on the right.  (Note that this applies to Kevin in the Radio Lab episode, “Blame”.)
 
 
 
::*Like Eagleton in our podcast, Sapolsky is saying that all of these efforts to defend “mitigated free will” fails '''because both sides of these distinction are part of the same physical world.  There is no humunculus.'''
 
 
 
===Small Group Discussion on Will Power and "Homuncular grit"===
 
 
 
:*Evaluate Sapolsky's chart on p. 597 showing how we divide "biological stuff" from "homuncular grit".  How far do you go in accepting his criticism of the distinction. (read below chart).  Are there reasons for thinking we have a “homunculus” that isn’t biological?  Does this lead you to reevaluate your agreement with the prosecutor in Kevin's case?
 
:*What is the "source" (what are the sources) of "will power"?  When you "find" willpower or marshal your personal resources to meet a challenge, is there a "who" who is deciding that or is there just a competition in your head based on all kinds of things, including perceive rewards and perceived risks?  Do you need a homunculus to have will power?
 
 
 
===Two Positions that might follow from your small group discussion===
 
 
 
:*1. There is “homuncular grit” and it’s not biological.
 
::*Supports this view: '''Moral Responsibility and Deserved Punishment.''' Moral responsibility can be desert based since it is almost always your “moral failure” when you break the law.  (Except for a small range of “mitigating circumstances”).  '''You can be guilty and deserve punishment.'''
 
 
 
:*2. It’s biology all the way down. (Meaning, you and your development.)
 
::*Supports this view: '''Accountability and Penalties View'''. 
 
:::*Society must enforce standards (through laws and regulations), but this mostly involves penalties and interventions.  Speeding tickets and the loss of liberty are effective ways of encouraging compliance.  Society is also entitled to self-protection.
 
:::*Moral responsibility just means “you have an obligation to meet the standards”.  No need for desert-based judgement or punishment.  Penalties and interventions are enough.  '''You can be judged to have failed to meet the standard and face consequences.''' If penalties don’t work or the social threat is great (e.g. murder), you might lose your liberty.
 

Latest revision as of 21:07, 14 April 2025

22. APR 14

Assigned Work

  • van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles" - externalities in the production of UPF.

In Class

  • Documentary reports

van Tulleken, C17, "The True Cost of Pringles"

  • Pringles case. UPF avoiding snack tax. In pringles case, ironically by claiming not much potato content. Pringles eventually loses the case. Very contorted arguments. Tax evasion is a kind of externality.
  • UPFs and climate. Additional fossil fuel inputs, inefficiency of UPF foods for meat production (feed ratio).
  • UPS and monoculture agriculture - Palm Oil particularly problematic. 258.
  • Carbon footprint of animal foods. 260 - 100g of beef 25kg of carbon dioxide / Beans .65kg.
  • Soy as animal food is relatively efficient feed ratio, but requires alot of processing. 261. To speed weight gain, we feed animals UPF feed.
  • Soy and Amazon rainforest depletion. Water depletion. Amazon goes from carbon sink to carbon producer.
  • Antibiotic use in animal production may be contributing to anti-biotic resistance.
  • UPF and plastic packaging.

In-Class

  • SCP: Short Critical Paper on the Ethics of Eating - Assigned

Winders and Ransom, "Introduction to the Global Meat Industry"

  • Intro
  • major concerns and questions: expansion of global meat industry makes several problems worse: environmental damage, effects on climate change, clean water, food insecurity, world hunger, consumer health, workers' rights and well-being, and (not least of all) the treatment of animals.
  • Note: the ethical case against meat is not limited to the problem of animal ethics. Some of the non-animal ethics problems can be ameliorated by not participating in the industrial supply chain.
  • Paradoxically, increased meat production can create food insecurity for some. 2.
  • Global meat industry is a product of gov't and industry collaborating:
  • Overproduces food animals relative to population.
  • Creates dangers for environment and workers. (esp. from hyperslaughter)
  • Global Meat Industry, 1960-2016
  • Per capita consumption doubled from 1960 to 2016: 20kg/person/year to 40. Mostly in Global North.
  • US has highest consumption by this data: 113.9kg/person/year (250 pounds a year! 4.8 pounds a week.)
  • 45 million metric tons (MMT) to 259 MMT.
  • $65 billion to about $400 billion.
  • US meat exports '60 to '15 -- 2.6 MMT to 27 MMT -- We're not doing this to feed us?
  • Note meat consumption increases occurred while population was also increasing. Population increase 1960-2016 3 billion to 7.4.
  • Note that US has declined from peak consumption, also some Europeans, esp Denmark, Netherlands, and French.
  • Increases in numbers of animals: 270% for pigs and 900% for chickens. Over 1.4 billion cows and pigs.
  • Meat exports: most from global north. Asian and emerging industrial countries big importers. (Meat consumption follows wealth increases.) p. 12: increases in China, for example, 3.5kg to 57.6kg, Mexico almost tripled, Russia doubled.
  • How did global meat grow so much?
  • 1. Increases in feed grain production. Now more global feed grain production than food grain production (rice and wheat). Along with ag tech to put more land into production, GE corn and soybeans increased yields.
  • 2. Trade policies - WTO - promotes free trade agreements for meat import/export.
  • 3. increased corporate concentration. both production and processing.
  • Concentration of processing produced scaling up. Read from p. 15. (Recall Maureen Ogle's history chapter.)
  • former communist countries became markets.
  • Consequences of global meat for consideration
  • 1. Corporate concentration - Global food corporations exert significant power over farmers and national governments. Many poor countries with food insecurity export meat to wealthier countries.
  • 2. Tension bt. cheap meat and food insecurity - Smallholder meat production in decline from competition.
  • 3. Social and environmental injustice. Many environmental effects of meat production fall disproportionately on poor countries and poor within rich countries.

SCP: Ethics of Eating Animals

  • Stage 1: Please write an 800-1000 word essay on the following prompt by Wednesday, April 24, 2023, 11:59pm.
  • Topic: Our work on ethical issues in eating and food systems has focused on two kinds of problems: First, are there compelling reasons to refrain from eating some or all animals? Second, does the global industrial food system violate ethical norms? Is this a reason for avoiding specific foods or companies? In this essay, address both of these issues, drawing on course readings and expressing your own opinion. Do either of these ethical problem areas have an impact on your personal food practices?
  • Advice about collaboration: Collaboration is part of the academic process and the intellectual world that college courses are based on, so it is important to me that you have the possibility to collaborate. I encourage you to collaborate with other students, but only up to the point of sharing ideas, references to class notes, and your own notes, verbally. Collaboration is also a great way to make sure that a high average level of learning and development occurs in the class. The best way to avoid plagiarism is to NOT share text of draft answers or outlines of your answer. Keep it verbal. Generate your own examples.
  • Prepare your answer and submit it in the following way. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions:
  1. To assure anonymity, you must remove your name from the the "author name" that you may have provided when you set up your word processing application. For instructions on removing your name from an Word or Google document, [click here].
  2. Format your answer in double spaced text, in a typical 12 point font, and using normal margins. Do not add spaces between paragraphs and indent the first line of each paragraph.
  3. Do not put your name in the file or filename. You may put your student ID number in the file, but not in the filename. Save your file for this assignment with the name: FoodEthics.
  4. To turn in your assignment, log into courses.alfino.org, click on the "#3: Food Ethics" dropbox.
  5. If you cannot meet a deadline, you must email me about your circumstances (unless you are having an emergency) before the deadline or you will lose points.
  • Stage 2: I will grade and briefly comment on your essays.