Philosophy of Food Class Notes

From Alfino
Revision as of 19:36, 24 January 2017 by Alfino (talk | contribs) (→‎JAN 24)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Reutrn to Philosophy of Food

JAN 19

  • Course Content: A brief look at the major course research questions.
  • Course mechanics:
  • Websites in this course. alfino.org --> wiki and courses.alfino.org
  • Roster information -- fill in google form
  • Main Assignments and "Grading Schemes"
  • To Do list:
  • Send me a brief introduction through the "Tell Me" form on the wiki. (Soon, please.)
  • Login to wiki for the first time and make a brief introduction on the practice page. (3 points if both are done by Friday.)
  • After rosters are posted, login to courses.alfino and look around. Note "Links" for pdfs. Retrieve reading for Monday (and read it).
  • Browse wiki pages.
  • Get the book. Pollan, In Defense of Food
  • Start printing pdfs. Highly recommended.
  • The Prep Cycle -- recommendations for success in the course!
  1. Read - Follow "Focus" notes on Reading schedule. Be ready for quizes.
  2. Track study questions during and after class - use your note taking to express main ideas in your terms, link in-class notes to your reading notes. Remember, almost all assessments in the course are open book & open note.
  3. Class -- Our pattern is to consolidate our understanding of the reading and then engage in philosophy on the basis of it.
This is the basic pattern for our coursework. From this cycle we then develop short philosophical writing and position papers using instructor and peer review.

JAN 24

Review of Three Food Documentaries

Philosophical Method

  • We'll use Cowspiracy today to illustrate this point about philosophical method:
Philosophers worry alot about the way a claim is stated. The strength of a claim is related to the sorts and amounts of evidence needed to support it. So if you state your claim (the conclusion of your "argument" broadly) too strongly you can have a bad argument even though a slightly weaker or more qualified version of the claim may be the best supported view.

Food Inc Notes

Fed Up!

Cowspiracy

Nestle, "Introduction: The Food Industry and 'Eat More,' from Food Politics"

Intro: "This book exposes the ways in which food companies use political ernment and professional support for the sale of their products."
  • we aren't critical of food industry -- assume they are interested in health.
  • mentions tobacco analogy
  • historic note: early 20th century still battled nutritional disease from inadequate calorie intake.
  • her professional experience (3) with editing Surgeon General's report: no "eat less meat" - Government gave up producing the report in 2000. Authoritative advice would have required some "eat less" messaging.
  • Side note: "New Dietary Guidelines Crack down on Sugar but red meat gets a pass," NPR Jan 7, 2016 [1]
  • her thesis: "that many of the nutritional problems of Americans—not least of them obesity—can be traced to the food industry's imperative to encourage people to eat more in order to generate sales and increase income in a highly competitive marketplace."
  • note her concise nutrition advice on p. 5ff.

JAN 26

JAN 31

FEB 2

FEB 7

FEB 9

FEB 14

FEB 16

FEB 23

FEB 28

MAR 2

MAR 7

MAR 9

==MAR 14==Spring Break ==MAR 16==Spring Break

MAR 23

MAR 28

MAR 30

APR 4

APR 6

APR 11

APR 13

APR 20

APR 25

APR 27

MAY 2

MAY 4