2010 Fall Proseminar Study Guide for Philosophical Method Test

From Alfino
Revision as of 05:40, 12 October 2010 by Scobb (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Return to Philosophy Proseminar

Here are some links corresponding to each of the topics on the study guide.


1. Understand all basic terms from argument theory.

Terms

2. Be able to distinguish explanations from arguments, deductive from inductive arguments.

Structure in deductive and inductive reasoning

The difference between explanation and argument

3. Review concept of validity and the Principle of Induction

Principle of Induction Concept of Validity

4. Understand, distinguish, and give examples of different types of definitions.

Notes on Definition

5. Explain and exemplify three main assessment strategies for arguments.

3 Main Assessment Strategies

6. Review both lists of philosophical methods and develop a definition and example for each.

1. Philosophical Methods

2. Philosophical Methods for Philosophy Majors

Our previous examples in student work

 Anyone who is interested in forming a study group for this and or Kries' We are meeting at 9 Monday at foley library
(email me at kkrossen@gmail.com or text (509)-230 4657).
 Hope this helps, 
 -Kennedy


    • Here is my study guide if this helps anyone else!

1) Understand basic terms from argument theory:

    -Claim: A statement that can be evaluated as true/falst
    -Reason: a claim/premises
    -Premise: reasons given for a claim (also can be a claim about a claim)
    -Conclusion: a claim
    -Argument: reasons offered to help decide whether/not to believe a conclusion
    -Explanation: reasons for a claim to help understand how a fact/situation came about
    -Rationale: offering one claim as reason for another
    -Reflective Deliberative Context: . . . sorry, haven't done much with this yet

2) Difference between explanations and arguments: (see definitions above)

    -Difference between deductive and inductive arguments:
         -Deductive argument: an argument that attempts to show conclusion with absolute certainty
         -Inductive argument: an argument that attempts to show that the conclusion is probable

3) Review concept of validity and principle of induction:

    -Validity: property of deductive arguments, guarantees that if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true, also needs formal structure
    -Principle of Induction: the assumption that nature is "uniform", assigning patterns to events

4) Understand/distinguish/give examples of different types of definitions:

    -